Sponsored

Metal chunk in oil drain pan after oil change today

shogun32

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2019
Threads
89
Messages
14,733
Reaction score
12,255
Location
Northern VA
First Name
Matt
Vehicle(s)
'19 GT/PP, '23 GB Mach1, '12 Audi S5 (v8+6mt)
Vehicle Showcase
2
wait, so the so-called "forged" updated part is still this fragile? It doesn't matter what materials you use when there isn't enough thickness, period.
 

Cory S

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2019
Threads
47
Messages
3,355
Reaction score
3,702
Location
Bradford, NH
First Name
Cory
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Premium
Gas water heaters last forever since they don’t have an electromagnetic field inside them. 25-30 years.

The anode rod is just a sacrificial piece of metal that gets eaten first by the electrical charge. Pretty much the same process as chrome plating. Most people are more familiar with them on boat motors.

C190C5A7-3C06-4F4D-96D9-5C513B23ED37.jpeg
My LP water heater is 20 years old this year. They are awesome. Electric=FTMFL
 

Strokerswild

Shallow and Pedantic
Joined
Nov 7, 2014
Threads
74
Messages
6,646
Reaction score
5,472
Location
Southern MN
First Name
Dave
Vehicle(s)
Things With Wheels
Yeah, my natural gas water heater turns 30 next spring. Still going strong.
 

SheepDog

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2018
Threads
18
Messages
2,338
Reaction score
2,737
Location
Colorado
First Name
Dax
Vehicle(s)
Iconic Silver 2022 MACH 1 HP
wait, so the so-called "forged" updated part is still this fragile? It doesn't matter what materials you use when there isn't enough thickness, period.
I've yet to see any hard data that says the 18+ sprockets are forged. I'll hit mine with a hammer when I get home and see... I may even have the one from my 2017 lying around for comparison.
 

Sponsored

Cobra Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2015
Threads
712
Messages
16,314
Reaction score
18,091
Location
NJ
Vehicle(s)
2018 EB Prem. w/PP and 94 Mustang Cobra
This actually happened again 9k miles after the new short block. Got a new long this time. Let's see how long this one lasts. It's currently got 1k miles on it.
1000000394.jpg

1000000389.jpg
@nate20gt
So what is Ford going to do this time around?

I mean, if this is an existing problem - imagine how many are out there with impending catastrophic failure looming....
 

shogun32

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2019
Threads
89
Messages
14,733
Reaction score
12,255
Location
Northern VA
First Name
Matt
Vehicle(s)
'19 GT/PP, '23 GB Mach1, '12 Audi S5 (v8+6mt)
Vehicle Showcase
2
Ford is still doing this sintered crap? The only way to mitigate damage if you persist in using Ford garbage part is the ratcheting cam chain tensioner
 

SheepDog

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2018
Threads
18
Messages
2,338
Reaction score
2,737
Location
Colorado
First Name
Dax
Vehicle(s)
Iconic Silver 2022 MACH 1 HP
Ford is still doing this sintered crap? The only way to mitigate damage if you persist in using Ford garbage part is the ratcheting cam chain tensioner
May as well just replace the sprocket with a forged one while your in there installing the tensioners.
 

shogun32

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2019
Threads
89
Messages
14,733
Reaction score
12,255
Location
Northern VA
First Name
Matt
Vehicle(s)
'19 GT/PP, '23 GB Mach1, '12 Audi S5 (v8+6mt)
Vehicle Showcase
2
May as well just replace the sprocket with a forged one while your in there installing the tensioners.
what needs to happen is to beat the tar out of the dumb-ass Ford engineer. Change the crank nose diameter down by 1-1.5mm, maybe as much as 2 and that way put some meat under that part. The choice of mod and tooth count constrain the OD they can work with so you compensate in this case on the ID. There's nothing else on the shaft at this location that a diameter change will hurt.
 

Cobra Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2015
Threads
712
Messages
16,314
Reaction score
18,091
Location
NJ
Vehicle(s)
2018 EB Prem. w/PP and 94 Mustang Cobra
Has anyone confirmed or compared the "assembly line" part number with the Ford Performance part number?

I have posted about this before in the other similar thread asking if the part offered by FP was in fact the so called revised part found in the 2018+ Coyote, but no one has ever answered or shot back any info to the affect of a "yes" or "no".
 

SheepDog

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2018
Threads
18
Messages
2,338
Reaction score
2,737
Location
Colorado
First Name
Dax
Vehicle(s)
Iconic Silver 2022 MACH 1 HP
what needs to happen is to beat the tar out of the dumb-ass Ford engineer. Change the crank nose diameter down by 1-1.5mm, maybe as much as 2 and that way put some meat under that part. The choice of mod and tooth count constrain the OD they can work with so you compensate in this case on the ID. There's nothing else on the shaft at this location that a diameter change will hurt.
I think the likelyhood of Ford changing the design is .000001%. Pretty much every engine in existance has some sort of weak point, or design flaw that made it to production. The "oil pressure only" chain tensioner is in my opinion, an unforgivable mistake. I think the crank sprocket failures may in fact be a result of the chain chattering or bouncing momentarily on the sprocket at startup, which is causing added stress and wear. (just my educated guess, no actual data to support it)

I do like the Boundary solution to have a burst ring forged into the center of the sprocket.

1694627081528.png


1694627107394.png
Sponsored

 
Last edited:
 




Top