Sponsored

lund nGauge, afr reading , wrong ?

fifteen5oh

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Threads
25
Messages
150
Reaction score
19
Location
SOCAL
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT A6
So I noticed that the afr reading on the nGauge and the afr reading on the oe instrument cluster both read different. on 91 oct nGauge reads higher maybe .4-5 more that the oe cluster display. Also on e85 the n-Gauge wasn't reading in the 8's @ wot like the instrument cluster was.

I tried reading both banks on the nGauge and some results.


Anyone else?
Sponsored

 

mustangflanagan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 22, 2015
Threads
31
Messages
455
Reaction score
62
Location
United States
Vehicle(s)
2015 mustang gt
I have the same issue with the flex tune. On the dash cruising it reads between 13.7-14.3 that seams rich to me compared to factory tune. I still got to look at the ngauge readings this is on 93 octane
 

mm2015

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2015
Threads
5
Messages
165
Reaction score
13
Location
Houston
First Name
Michael
Vehicle(s)
'15 GT PP
I have the same issue with the flex tune. On the dash cruising it reads between 13.7-14.3 that seams rich to me compared to factory tune. I still got to look at the ngauge readings this is on 93 octane
This screams rich to you? Stock usually runs about 14.5, right under stoich... My non-flex tune runs about 13.7-14.3, I wouldn't call that rich for me. I could be wrong though, I don't tune cars :shrug:
 

Martman GT

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2015
Threads
14
Messages
501
Reaction score
167
Location
Reno, NV
First Name
Marty
Vehicle(s)
2015 TY GT Premium
I have the same issue with the flex tune. On the dash cruising it reads between 13.7-14.3 that seams rich to me compared to factory tune. I still got to look at the ngauge readings this is on 93 octane
Correct me if I'm wrong, but those numbers are lean. The richer the mixture the lower the #.
 

Sponsored

Grimace427

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2013
Threads
14
Messages
6,467
Reaction score
1,702
Location
NoVA
Vehicle(s)
2011 Mustang 5.0
Correct me if I'm wrong, but those numbers are lean. The richer the mixture the lower the #.

Lean compared to WOT mixtures, yes. For cruising having the AFR in the 14.x range is perfectly fine.
 

slowpony

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2015
Threads
24
Messages
189
Reaction score
27
Location
United States
Vehicle(s)
2016 mustang A6 5.0
I don't think there is an average afr on the Ngauge so you are reading left or right bank which is why it's off. I haven't seen an afr pid that is not bank 1 or 2
 

Choking_Victim

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2015
Threads
26
Messages
589
Reaction score
81
Location
Arizona
First Name
Justin
Vehicle(s)
2018 A10 GT PP
I was under the impression ford calibrated the stock sensor instrumentation to read e10 which is stoich at 14.1-14.2 the ngauge calibration is for regular gas 14.7 (stoich). I have my ngauge showing lambda which will report the same regardless of fuel..pump,e85 etc. Lund target .83 to.85 which is low to mid 12's afr on pump gas. If that is your tuner.
Sponsored

 
 








Top