Sponsored

Is Ford lacking on performance?

Grintch

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2014
Threads
15
Messages
1,918
Reaction score
823
Location
Hunstville
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT PP
Honestly, I don't see what the big deal is. People who frequent the track are going to do frequent fluid changes, swap out the brake fluid, brake pads and tires. Why is it such a big deal to add on a transmission cooler scoop or an diff cooler? I bet there is less than 10 people in this forum that actually NEED the above mentioned. The rest just complain that the camaro has it and the mustang doesn't.

Honestly, I don't understand people who feel the need to post in which car is faster threads who don't care which car is faster.

None of us NEED a 400+ hp, 165mph car. But if I am buying one, and I am willing to pay extra for the expensive track package, well I want a track package that is at least as good as the competitions equally priced track package.
Sponsored

 

Arthonon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Threads
9
Messages
626
Reaction score
464
Location
California
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT
The PP1 is a more track compliant car than the GT. It has the brakes, suspension tweaks, torsen diff and summer tires to make it a better option for occasional track use. It's label as a performance pack is spot on. It is not, nor has it ever been billed as a track terror.
That's similar to my thinking. Ford used to have a track pack for the S197s, but they changed the name to Performance Pack for the S550 GTs, so I figured they were protecting themselves from saying it's a full-on track car.
 

Hack

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2014
Threads
86
Messages
12,801
Reaction score
8,209
Location
Minneapolis
Vehicle(s)
Mustang, Challenger
and thats not what im complaining about, its the fact that you give all these track focused options that appeal to people for track use, then leave out things that would allow it to be used in the manner of which youre advertising
I definitely agree with you that if Ford advertises a car as being "the most track capable Mustang ever", or something like that, then the components needed for the common style of HPDE (not racing, but driving aggressively around a track in a controlled environment) should be installed on the car.

I wasn't aware that the PP1 option was advertised in that way. I looked at the 2018 Mustang brochure and it just lists the components that come with the PP1 option. It doesn't state anything about how the car will perform with those components.

Can you link to Ford's statements about the PP1 option that you are complaining about?
 
OP
OP
howlins550

howlins550

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2018
Threads
22
Messages
194
Reaction score
60
Location
Cincinnati
Vehicle(s)
2019 mustang GT PP1, 401A, 10R80, Magneride, Active exhaust, Oxford White
I definitely agree with you that if Ford advertises a car as being "the most track capable Mustang ever", or something like that, then the components needed for the common style of HPDE (not racing, but driving aggressively around a track in a controlled environment) should be installed on the car.

I wasn't aware that the PP1 option was advertised in that way. I looked at the 2018 Mustang brochure and it just lists the components that come with the PP1 option. It doesn't state anything about how the car will perform with those components.

Can you link to Ford's statements about the PP1 option that you are complaining about?
I'm speaking more on the PP2, suspension tweaks being considerably stiffer, very wide sticky tires, functional aero work, more aggressive steering, sits a half in lower and runs 3.5 sec faster than a pp1... They do all that then say that's it's not a track car or direct competition to the 1le...so what exactly did you build it for lol?

People who are going to be interested in this trim I would assume are going to be more likely to autox or track it a few times, yet adding all that, there is no cooling for what the car should be used for
 
OP
OP
howlins550

howlins550

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2018
Threads
22
Messages
194
Reaction score
60
Location
Cincinnati
Vehicle(s)
2019 mustang GT PP1, 401A, 10R80, Magneride, Active exhaust, Oxford White
Kind of ties into my feelings towards the GT350, design it as a track mustang yet don't add additional cooling standard and all the problem s that stemmed from that, it's now standard on 17+ models
 

Sponsored

millhouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2016
Threads
18
Messages
2,652
Reaction score
1,217
Location
Simpsonville SC
Vehicle(s)
2016 Ruby Red GT PP
Honestly, I don't understand people who feel the need to post in which car is faster threads who don't care which car is faster.

None of us NEED a 400+ hp, 165mph car. But if I am buying one, and I am willing to pay extra for the expensive track package, well I want a track package that is at least as good as the competitions equally priced track package.
Ford doesn't offer a track package for the GT.

If you want an all out, lap it all day track ready mustang buy the GT350TP or GT350R....as that is all that Ford currently offers. If you can't afford it, buy the SS1LE or deal with adding some minor cooling to the PP2.

If it pisses you off that you have to, suck it up and deal with it....you'll be spending far, far more money on track fees, track insurance, consistent tire and brake changes, fluid changes etc. A trans and diff cooler are a drop in the bucket compared to what you'll be paying for regularly tracking your car. If you aren't pushing the car hard enough to warrant the above-mentioned, then you don't need the damn coolers in the first place.


That's similar to my thinking. Ford used to have a track pack for the S197s, but they changed the name to Performance Pack for the S550 GTs, so I figured they were protecting themselves from saying it's a full-on track car.
I think they realized their marketing claim of "track pack" was pure garbage. Performance pack is a much better marketing play, as it's not a true "track pack".

I definitely agree with you that if Ford advertises a car as being "the most track capable Mustang ever", or something like that, then the components needed for the common style of HPDE (not racing, but driving aggressively around a track in a controlled environment) should be installed on the car.

I wasn't aware that the PP1 option was advertised in that way. I looked at the 2018 Mustang brochure and it just lists the components that come with the PP1 option. It doesn't state anything about how the car will perform with those components.

Can you link to Ford's statements about the PP1 option that you are complaining about?
That was always my take on it. I was never under the impression that the PP1 was a track star, just a more track ready machine for the AVERAGE consumer. If anyone searched the internet, they'll be lucky to find more than a handful of overheating complaints on the track. Most people just don't lap these cars long enough.
 

millhouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2016
Threads
18
Messages
2,652
Reaction score
1,217
Location
Simpsonville SC
Vehicle(s)
2016 Ruby Red GT PP
I'm speaking more on the PP2, suspension tweaks being considerably stiffer, very wide sticky tires, functional aero work, more aggressive steering, sits a half in lower and runs 3.5 sec faster than a pp1... They do all that then say that's it's not a track car or direct competition to the 1le...so what exactly did you build it for lol?

People who are going to be interested in this trim I would assume are going to be more likely to autox or track it a few times, yet adding all that, there is no cooling for what the car should be used for
It absolutely is direct competition....Ford saying otherwise is full of shit. And yes, they should have added additional cooling and eaten the extra costs (for the PP2 only).

Kind of ties into my feelings towards the GT350, design it as a track mustang yet don't add additional cooling standard and all the problem s that stemmed from that, it's now standard on 17+ models
I'm sorry, there is a reason they offered a track pack. Ford tried to give the public a cheaper GT350....but those that were too ignorant and cheap to buy the track pack bitched that their non-track pack cars were (gasp) overheating on the track. The cooling package that was included just bumped the base price up (which screwed those that would never track their vehicles).
 

bootlegger

Enginerd
Joined
Jul 12, 2017
Threads
9
Messages
1,764
Reaction score
594
Location
Mount Pleasant, SC
First Name
James
Vehicle(s)
Ex 2008 Mustang GT Owner
Ford doesn't offer a track package for the GT.

If you want an all out, lap it all day track ready mustang buy the GT350TP or GT350R....as that is all that Ford currently offers. If you can't afford it, buy the SS1LE or deal with adding some minor cooling to the PP2.
This.

I didn't buy a PP1 to have a track ready car. Who would even confuse PP1 as a track car? It has regular HP summer tires. PP2 is closer to a track pack, but I don't believe Ford ever advertised it in this way. Even at that, the PP2 is a great bargain for someone looking at a starting point for a track car. It is essentially $3k less than an SS 1LE (if you don't require leather), comes with GT350 suspension, and has the right tires for a weekend track event. As you said, add a couple coolers and go.
 
OP
OP
howlins550

howlins550

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2018
Threads
22
Messages
194
Reaction score
60
Location
Cincinnati
Vehicle(s)
2019 mustang GT PP1, 401A, 10R80, Magneride, Active exhaust, Oxford White
This.

I didn't buy a PP1 to have a track ready car. Who would even confuse PP1 as a track car? It has regular HP summer tires. PP2 is closer to a track pack, but I don't believe Ford ever advertised it in this way. Even at that, the PP2 is a great bargain for someone looking at a starting point for a track car. It is essentially $3k less than an SS 1LE (if you don't require leather), comes with GT350 suspension, and has the right tires for a weekend track event. As you said, add a couple coolers and go.
$3k less? You're required to upgrade to the premium interior and last I built both the Camaro was cheaper
 

Genxer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2014
Threads
14
Messages
1,643
Reaction score
841
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT / Perf pack / DIB
Vehicle Showcase
1
ok i am a old track whore. i have been racing cars longer then most of the guys of the guys on this forum have been alive. With that said I can tell you with the right driver you can go around a tight track quicker in a Civic then you can in our GT's or the 1LE. For years i had a Honda S2000 as a track car, all she had was 245 h.p. Just for fun i took my modified CTSV with just a tad over 700 h.p., it too me several track sessions to match my lap times that i had in my S2000. Dont worry about which car looks better on paper. Learn all you can with your stock mustang, then add mods that are needed for your type of driving. Trust me even the above avg. driver cant get all the performance the stock GT has to offer.
i watched a 17 year old blond little girl in a stock 1987 nissan sentra kick the butts of many Mustangs, Camaros and 3 series bmw's in a autocross meet. The car is a tool just like the paint brush. it is the artist that makes the painting a master piece.
Just to tack on to what you said... I'm not a racer but doesn't tracking a car usually involve a lot of upgrading anyway? Things like tires, suspension, etc. People like to compare a bone stock vs bone stock vehicle, but how many racers leave them that way? I would think the potential of a car is what matters.
 

Sponsored

Abb0nz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Threads
9
Messages
85
Reaction score
18
Location
Houston, Tx
First Name
Paul
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT
Late to this conversation but the way I look at it the Base/Premium GT does get compared to the SS. Like it, or not, they are both the lowest cost V8 offering so they are naturally compared to each other. Neither car are supposed to be track ready although, from what I've read here, the SS is closer than the GT.
In regard to the original post, what I don't understand is why the Mustangs torque is so poor when compared to the Camaros. Even with FI and/or mod's the torque figures are well behind that of the Camaro.
 

jake_zx2

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
Jun 19, 2016
Threads
11
Messages
2,305
Reaction score
1,418
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
Kona Blue 2018 GT
Vehicle Showcase
1
Maybe for a few laps until PP2 goes into limp mode and the 1LE (or even SS) just keeps chugging along with no issues. Heat is a major problem down south. I'm not sure how relevant it is in Germany.
Haven't heard anything really about the S550s going into limp mode even down south... worst I've seen is diff overheating, and as I've said, that can be cured with some higher viscosity fluid (Or, if you feel the need to be extra cautious, spend the $900 on a diff cooler). It's pretty much a non-issue in Germany, the hottest it ever gets over here is about 90*

Honestly, I don't understand people who feel the need to post in which car is faster threads who don't care which car is faster.

None of us NEED a 400+ hp, 165mph car. But if I am buying one, and I am willing to pay extra for the expensive track package, well I want a track package that is at least as good as the competitions equally priced track package.
But you're not willing to pay an extra $900 for a diff cooler? Now you see why Ford didn't include it... if they would have, people would bitch about pricing and not buy it at all. At least this way, they can sell them and people will bitch that it doesn't have coolers, but still buy the car and just add on coolers
 

bootlegger

Enginerd
Joined
Jul 12, 2017
Threads
9
Messages
1,764
Reaction score
594
Location
Mount Pleasant, SC
First Name
James
Vehicle(s)
Ex 2008 Mustang GT Owner
$3k less? You're required to upgrade to the premium interior and last I built both the Camaro was cheaper
Since when? There are a few people with the cloth interior PP2 cars on this forum. The only requirement for PP2 is 301A, which is also a requirement for Magneride. MSRP for the 1LE cars I have seen were around $46k. When I priced out a PP2, before ordering my PP1, it was about $43k and change. The difference between PP2 and my current car was like $600 something.
 

millhouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2016
Threads
18
Messages
2,652
Reaction score
1,217
Location
Simpsonville SC
Vehicle(s)
2016 Ruby Red GT PP
Haven't heard anything really about the S550s going into limp mode even down south... worst I've seen is diff overheating, and as I've said, that can be cured with some higher viscosity fluid (Or, if you feel the need to be extra cautious, spend the $900 on a diff cooler). It's pretty much a non-issue in Germany, the hottest it ever gets over here is about 90*



But you're not willing to pay an extra $900 for a diff cooler? Now you see why Ford didn't include it... if they would have, people would bitch about pricing and not buy it at all. At least this way, they can sell them and people will bitch that it doesn't have coolers, but still buy the car and just add on coolers
Agreed, there have been very....very few failures at the track attributed to diff and trans overheating issues (as seen by lack of complaints here and in other forums). Most concerned about the transmission would likely do just fine with this... https://www.cjponyparts.com/ford-ra...MIl6bEg5yh2gIVDK_ICh2-1gO5EAQYAiABEgLhhfD_BwE

It works quite well for the Boss 302LS, and is claimed to reduce trans temps by more than 25deg F

Ford is doing a great Job appealing to the 99%. I think some people just get pissed when the competition has more features than their vehicle....but they don't understand that they paid more to get those features...even if they were standard.
 
 








Top