INJEN Intake Install

[GTBOB]

Back from the track as promised!

DA was 1656, the worst I've see at this track. Usually in the 850s-900. My previous best was a 12.14 at 117mph with the Roush intake. Injen installed and a new tune, I ran a new best of 11.89 at 116.71 backing it up with a 11.90 at 116.7 again :

Right lane 426

Sponsored

 

[mustang_guy]

Id bet the airaid mit, afe filter and big mouth, reso delete and cap on the tube that leaves the engine, flows as much as the injen with a big mouth. Just a guess. Keeping an eye on this for my buddy as hes not wanting more then basic bolt ons and a closed box type intake set up.

 

[GTBOB]

For reference, I data logged the 11.90 run and I was seeing a maf reading of 45.7lbs at 7300rpm.

 

[5.0_Tyler]

What is the airaid MIT??

 

[mustang_guy]

What is the airaid MIT??

http://www.hypermotive.com/airaid-modular-intake-tubes-mit-15-gt/

This is the big mouth
http://www.velossatechdesign.com/product/2015-2016-s550-mustang-big-mouth-ram-air-kit/

 

[Need4Speed15]

Back from the track as promised!

DA was 1656, the worst I've see at this track. Usually in the 850s-900. My previous best was a 12.14 at 117mph with the Roush intake. Injen installed and a new tune, I ran a new best of 11.89 at 116.71 backing it up with a 11.90 at 116.7 again :

Right lane 426

Nice times, congrats! When you ran your best with the Roush was it with or without the insert? What 60ft? Can you post the best Roush timeslip for comparison?

Regardless, nice work!

Edit: found your slip in the fast times thread

2015 GT Premium, manual
Modifications LUND FF/SP LTH/ROUSH CAI/DRAG RADIAL 295/45/17
Fast List Category Submitted For: BOLT ONS
R/T......................................... .197
60'..........................................1.866
330'........................................5.224
1/8th........................................7.913
mph........................................92.31
1000'.......................................9.639
1320'......................................12.143
1320’ mph….............................117.08

Name of the track: Edgewater in Cleves, OH
Date of pass:4/15/2016
Weather conditions: 7:51PM DA 1286

You had a way better 60ft last night, but overall it seems you did pick up alittle in worse DA. Congrats again!

 

[GTBOB]

My 60ft suffered with the Roush setup because it was sucking in hot, under-hood engine heat at the line and staging area. It would bog. I always ran the Roush without the reducer.

The Injen and new tune has no bog whatsoever. Just like on the street during data logs, it "recovers" after every gear change so much better now. I hope Greg at Lund doesn't get mad but this is still a revision tune that I ran last night LOL It's not the final tune. They have yet to look at this current data logs/tune .

 

[mustang_guy]

E85 doesnt suffer from DA nearly as much as your typical 93. He lost mph. 300 da is almost nothing in difference for e85. Breaking 11 was purely because of 60ft.

 

[Need4Speed15]

My 60ft suffered with the Roush setup because it was sucking in hot, under-hood engine heat at the line and staging area. It would bog. I always ran the Roush without the reducer.

Not too sure about that, lots of guys run open element filters!

Any chance you may have just launched with alittle more RPM last night which produced a better 60ft which produced a better ET?

 

[Sasuketr]

Non of this proves anything. Running different intakes with tunes and all. To prove its the intake, someone has to run it on stock tune same day, same track, same time of the day back to back on factory stock tune. If the injen consistently gets better results then we have a winner!

 

[GTBOB]

Geez, rough crowd! I launch at 4K every run, with 16psi in my drag radials every run. It's test and tune night so the track is garbage. Ask Beefcake how Edgewater is. 3 weeks ago I beat a Hellcat by .002 seconds Lol!

I ran a 12.11 at 118mph on one run last night. A stupid dually rolled through the water box right before my run so I spun pretty bad. 1.89 60ft on that run.

To say the INJEN intake alone made a .3 second difference would be laughable. To say this intake and a new tune had something to do with it? Definitely. My Roush tune was 8 months old and Lund has probably learned a little bit since then and that knowledge is incorporated in this newest tune/revision.

:cheers:

 

[mustang_guy]

Geez, rough crowd! I launch at 4K every run, with 16psi in my drag radials every run. It's test and tune night so the track is garbage. Ask Beefcake how Edgewater is. 3 weeks ago I beat a Hellcat by .002 seconds Lol!

I ran a 12.11 at 118mph on one run last night. A stupid dually rolled through the water box right before my run so I spun pretty bad. 1.89 60ft on that run.

To say the INJEN intake alone made a .3 second difference would be laughable. To say this intake and a new tune had something to do with it? Definitely. My Roush tune was 8 months old and Lund has probably learned a little bit since then and that knowledge is incorporated in this newest tune/revision.

:cheers:

I dont agree that it had anything to do with it. You trapped slower and your back end time is slower at the 1000 mark. It doesnt take much for the track to be slightly more grippy. Your idea of the intake making the difference is flawed. Its not a rough crowd. Spinning more also is why you trapped higher after the truck. It wasnt because of power.

 

[jvm051]

It's been said before and said again, different nights and different results. You drive a manual and there is more opportunity for variances than a auto car. I seriously doubt the intake made that much of a difference. Most intakes have proven to make little if any power over the stock box, but all the sudden the injen is the magic unicorn of the bunch. If anything it was the tune because they data logged your specific CAI and your car, since most likely they did not have on file like the Roush. Has Lund learned something, yes you were the huckleberry with the injen.

 

[Choking_Victim]

grats on the 11 sec pass...moving

 

[GTBOB]

It's been said before and said again, different nights and different results. You drive a manual and there is more opportunity for variances than a auto car. I seriously doubt the intake made that much of a difference. Most intakes have proven to make little if any power over the stock box, but all the sudden the injen is the magic unicorn of the bunch. If anything it was the tune because they data logged your specific CAI and your car, since most likely they did not have on file like the Roush. Has Lund learned something, yes you were the huckleberry with the injen.

And I certainly agree with you I created this thread to merely show that I'm trying a different intake to combat IATs. I like my Roush and I wanted to find out if I would lose performance by going to this unknown intake over the Roush. People asked early on if I would visit a track with it. So I posted my results after I did. It did not performance worse than the Roush. For me, I'm happy with my purchase as it caused me to have a better tune. Free at that!!

Sponsored