Individual port head

[Blyman93]

I see we have an individual port head available! Can work with the 2.3. What are the advantages here as it says for higher hp applications? I can assume a better pulsing exhaust note. Better flow for turbo efficiency and CFM movement? Would this be a good modification or a waste? If anything, I'd love a better exhaust sound

Sponsored

 

[Blyman93]

Also note, obviously requires a custom exhaust manifold.

https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-6049-20EBIP

 

[Blyman93]

Last note, MAP has a tubular manifold to work but that's with there IPH, same thing anyways. I know that's what they used on their high output car.

https://www.maperformance.com/produ...bm-efr-ip-tk?gclid=CK3n7ODki9QCFUlNfgods1wOQg

 

[Dirty-EB-Chicago]

Sub'd

 

[Billy1]

I have been waiting for someone to do this conversion just to hear how it sounds. But I couldn't even find a vid of this head/engine running.

 

[Blyman93]

I think MAP used it on their 640hp dyno run. If so that sounded the same as their 500hp video and launch with stock motor. Never got a idle or light driving video though and the 2.5" piping is a little higher pitch and smooth sounding vs say the Mbrp

 

[MiDiablo]

This will be one part included in the next round of performance modifications for Scarlet (end of 2018 most likely).

My understanding was that the head itself was only worth a marginal gain, however, the fact that it allows you to go to a full tubular manifold with a T4 flange - which opens up your turbo options - is where the real benefit(s) come from.

 

[Billy1]

Another benefit I would think is the sound.

 

[Blyman93]

Another benefit I would think is the sound.

Honestly id buy this just for the freaking sound lol

Sponsored