Guessing 405/380 is about the norm

[Dolsvt00]

For a stock pp car with a JLT? Just tuned my own pp m6 car tonight. Sound about right? Dynojet 224.

Ive tuned hundreds of 11-14 gts and lughtnings and 2-3 v mustangs. Just wondering how everyone else is stacking up.

Sponsored

 

[madweazl]

I hit 401.9 with the SCT preloaded 93 octane tune (S-type catback but otherwise bone stock) on a Dyno Dynamics so it doesnt seem out of line with my results.

 

[madsedan]

With only a JLT, without running a 93 octane tune, that's about right. 93 octance optimized tune and a 3" cat back should get you in the 415/417 range I'd guess.

 

[Lonmon]

I went 393whp on factory air box and sct canned 93 tune and res delete, then 415whp with JLT and sct canned tune and res delete, then 417whp 389wtq with a Lund tune, mak cat deletes and sw catback. I did pick up low end power and torque under the curve with the Lund tune despite the peaks being very close. (of course the cat deletes may have had something to do with that). I have learned not to trust the dyno exclusively as my car has certainly made gains throughout this entire process despite it not showing so much with the cat deletes and Lund tune.

 

[madweazl]

With only a JLT, without running a 93 octane tune, that's about right. 93 octance optimized tune and a 3" cat back should get you in the 415/417 range I'd guess.

Corrected for DA to make it equal to the run I made 401.9hp, the JLT, Lund tune, and 2.5" catback produced just under 416hp (415.8 I think but cant remember off the top of my head) so I would tend to agree with what you posted. Actual numbers were 408 or 409hp.

 

[Akwarreng]

408/370 dyno tuned with jlt and mbrp cat back

 

[Chameleon]

408/370 dyno tuned with jlt and mbrp cat back

Sounds right. Looking forward to my dyno results this week!

Sponsored