Gt350 or C8

Discussion in 'Shelby GT350 Mustang' started by lana66, Jul 29, 2019.

  1. machsmith

    machsmith Well-Known Member

    First Name:
    Jim
    Vehicle(s):
    Honda Minis
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2016
    Location:
    somewhere along the river
    Posts:
    3,514
    Likes Received:
    1,939
    0   0   0
    yes sir, but you can add the back seat if you want. That's why I say back seat. there is no option for that in a C8.
     
    White_GT_CS likes this.
  2. Bulldogs22

    Bulldogs22 Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    2019 Shelby GT350
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2019
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Posts:
    190
    Likes Received:
    128
    0   0   0
    I was talking to the other poster Cosmo not you and I do know about other engines and models I’m not claiming to be an engineering expert but I know enough to know I valued the 350 and it’s engine tech above other ones and let’s be real I can’t take apart engines like some of the other super knowledgeable and capable people on here but I obviously researched a ton before I got my 350 and I’m not missing out on anything if I would of wanted a Chevy then that’s what I would of gotten I’ve driven a Camaro with the 6.2 and it is a torque monster compared to fords but that’s not what does it for me in an engine I like to rev it out and have blip ability on downshifts which the 350 provides.
     
  3. mrbillwot

    mrbillwot Well-Known Member

    First Name:
    Bill
    Vehicle(s):
    MY19 GT350, 89 LX5.0Sedan (Mustangs Past: 69's Coupe, Mach 1, & GT)
    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2019
    Location:
    Greater Boston Area
    Posts:
    388
    Likes Received:
    241
    Occupation:
    Engineer
    0   0   0
    I find these to be odd comparisons -- one should pick whatever one finds appealing - how could that be wrong (and who's going to care enough to convince you otherwise? ;-)
    Next stop going to a brunet model dating site and hem & haw over the pros & cons of blondes.

    Not sure, aside from taking the younger kiddies for a ride, the 350's backseats makes sense let alone rationalizing a reinstall into an R for thoese rare occasions. But it is fold down storage space for those golf clubs & fishing poles ;-)

    I brought a scandanavian work bench home in my non hatch LX 5.0 sedan (pushing the limits of common sense and seat contortion) and more regularly would cart around my drum kit in that car....things I'd say no, not going to happen these days. They're sports cars not sports utes. 2 seats isn't plenty?
     
  4. JR369

    JR369 Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    2018 GT350R
    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2018
    Location:
    In The Shadows
    Posts:
    706
    Likes Received:
    529
    0   0   0
    And that's alright and ALL AMERICAN. The Corvette has always been advertised as the affordable sports car for Americans.
     
    machsmith likes this.
  5. GrabberBlue

    GrabberBlue Well-Known Member

    First Name:
    Alex
    Vehicle(s):
    2017 Grabber Blue GT350
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2015
    Location:
    Phoenix
    Posts:
    395
    Likes Received:
    183
    0   0   0
    The 5.5 FPC is going to cause waves.

    Chevy was waiting for Ford to build it so they could steal it. They are now unfortunately going to potentially have the better engine with the 5.5 FPC. 600 HP, higher redline and more refined.

    For starters, the engine replacement numbers are low. They are hyperboles thanks to the internet.

    Oil consumption is not uncommon on FPC and high performance engines. Especially those with low tension piston rings and high compression like the Voodoo.

    What filter issues? Haven't heard of a single failure due to a properly installed oil filter.

    Haven't heard of a single block cracking on its own.

    Again, another non-existent issue. What exhaust manifold issues?

    Mass production will inherently have issues with manufacturing (supply) defects. The GT350 is no exception but to imply it is above the industry standard for defects is ridiculous.
     
  6. dpAtlanta

    dpAtlanta Well-Known Member

    First Name:
    Dave
    Vehicle(s):
    2019 GT350 (#K2503), 2017 Cayman
    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2019
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts:
    447
    Likes Received:
    496
    0   0   0
    I hear ya... but this is the internet and this is an internet forum. This is common place (i.e. "fake news").
    The few Keyboard Cowboys and Internet Engineers can surely start a story and stir the pot.
    I take a fair amount of whats said by them not with a grain of salt, but with an ocean of salt.
     
  7. Hack

    Hack Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    Fiesta
    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2014
    Location:
    Minneapolis
    Posts:
    8,991
    Likes Received:
    4,438
    0   0   0
    The small block has better efficiency? That doesn't sound right to me. Is that why the GM products have to turn off cylinders and force 1-4 shifts? Does the small block have air/oil separators incorporated to prevent coking of the intake valves?

    I like the small block, but I hate all the things that the EPA makes GM do with the SBC. DOD is terrible. Direct injection without dual injection I really dislike. And 1-4 shifts suck bad too.

    I'd much rather have a Ford engine in a modern situation where those goofy additions are not needed.

    I bet with the LT2 in the 'vette there will be annoying programming in the DCT similar to the 1-4 setup for fuel economy.

    Chevy doesn't need Ford's help to build a FPC engine. The mid-engine configuration is a good one for a FPC engine, since they will be able to set up two individual throttle bodies and go with a Ferrari firing order. It should be good.

    Too bad it still won't have a manual transmission.
     
    White_GT_CS likes this.
  8. cosmo

    cosmo Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    2005 Mustang GT
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2014
    Location:
    Michigan
    Posts:
    1,753
    Likes Received:
    742
    0   0   0
    I've been here since the GT350 launched and watched these issues as they started occuring. I work in the Dearborn area as an automotive engineer, and know many Ford engineers who I pick their brain on. I'm not reporting anything false. Don't believe if you want, but the truth doesn't care about what you believe.

    The issues I listed apart from the filter are listed in the link below. Zitrosound's first GT350 had a cracked block and posted about it here. A buddy of mine had his A/C Compressor replaced, and when they were reinstalling it they found a cracked block. There are a few others listed who had a block problem.

    https://www.mustang6g.com/forums/threads/replaced-voodoo-engine.104010/

    The spin-on filters used to have issues with backing off before they switched to canisters in 2017.

    Manifolds: https://www.mustang6g.com/forums/threads/exhaust-leak-cracked-manifold.114240/
    https://www.mustang6g.com/forums/threads/cracked-header-opinions-please.100316/
     
  9. nastang87xx

    nastang87xx Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    2016 GT350 Track Pack
    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2015
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Posts:
    6,231
    Likes Received:
    3,685
    0   0   0
    Not from a fuel efficiency MPG standpoint but from a stoichiometric standpoint. Basically that's asking how effective is one measure of AFR mixture at producing power. This is extremely hard to explain and there's a lot that can be countered without going super in depth but for now, just look at the torque curves RPM for RPM between say a Coyote and an LT1. The LT1 is pulling way harder for pretty much its entire RPM band and the Coyote doesn't peak until the LT1 is passed its own peak where it then drops off. LT1 and Coyote fuel consumption is actually quite similar so this is a reasonable comparison. Obviously there's more to a complete vehicle's overall fuel efficiency though, gearing, tires, etc. We're just talking strictly the engine traversed through its RPM band here.
     
    White_GT_CS likes this.
  10. Hack

    Hack Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    Fiesta
    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2014
    Location:
    Minneapolis
    Posts:
    8,991
    Likes Received:
    4,438
    0   0   0
    Are you talking about brake specific fuel consumption?

    RPM bands and where peak power hits has to do with how the engines are cammed and the sizes of the ports with respect to the engine displacement. The functional RPM band doesn't have to do with OHC vs. cam in block (although it is easier to make an OHC engine breathe really well).

    Ford's setup allows cam overlap to be adjusted throughout the RPM band, so you can get more flexibility in how the engine makes power without messing up emissions. Emissions are really the thing that limits what the engines are doing right now, more than anything else. Cam in block engines can rev to 10,000 RPM and make power way up high if you want them to. Just look at the NASCAR 5.7 V8 engines. Those don't meet EPA emissions guidelines though.
     
  11. Bulldogs22

    Bulldogs22 Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    2019 Shelby GT350
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2019
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Posts:
    190
    Likes Received:
    128
    0   0   0
    My thoughts exactly way easier to do a FPC engine with a mid-engined setup
     
  12. EcoVert

    EcoVert Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    2015 Ecoboost convertible
    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Location:
    W.VA
    Posts:
    3,216
    Likes Received:
    1,557
    Garage Profiles:
    4
    0   0   0
    With twin turbos watch and see the 1st year there will be lots of them grenading
     
  13. EcoVert

    EcoVert Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    2015 Ecoboost convertible
    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Location:
    W.VA
    Posts:
    3,216
    Likes Received:
    1,557
    Garage Profiles:
    4
    0   0   0
    GM always does that witness camaro then the mid engine corvette. Copy the Mustang and the GT
     
    MNGT350 likes this.
  14. nastang87xx

    nastang87xx Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    2016 GT350 Track Pack
    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2015
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Posts:
    6,231
    Likes Received:
    3,685
    0   0   0
    No not exactly. There's a video out there from Ford talking about the 7.3L which actually relates exactly to what I'm referring to. I'll try to find it. It's kinda ironic that Ford released poewr numbers for the Godzilla today and we're talking about this as well. That's going to be a great work engine.
     
    EcoVert likes this.
  15. nastang87xx

    nastang87xx Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    2016 GT350 Track Pack
    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2015
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Posts:
    6,231
    Likes Received:
    3,685
    0   0   0
    Same could be said about Gen 3 Coyote too though.
     
Loading...

Share This Page