Old 5 Oh
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2014
- Threads
- 24
- Messages
- 2,422
- Reaction score
- 329
- Location
- Wilder, ID
- First Name
- David
- Vehicle(s)
- 2015 GT Premium AT
- Thread starter
- #1
There are a lot of threads in this topic about the GT versus cars costing $5,000 to $30,000 more money, and while those can be interesting conversations, they are not very relevant to a lot of us (me included) who are stretching to buy a $40,000 daily driver.
I'm sure an M4 is an exciting drive. At $75,000, it should be. And ZL1 Camaros and Hellcat Challengers have their attractions (I wouldn't want either one, frankly) but at $60 grand, they are competition for a Mustang that hasn't yet been introduced.
Just for fun, I went looking for what I could buy for the same $39K MSRP as my car on order. The list isn't very encouraging, and the Mustang looks pretty darn awesome in comparison.
BMW? A fairly stripped 228i is the best you can do. Almost any M235i is nearly $50 grand. The 3-series and 4-series start in the mid 40s and head quickly north. Strike this brand.
Audi? A stripped A5 is $40K even. With a few options and an AT, it's $45K. Wow. I guess I could get an A3 into the budget, but why?
Chevrolet? A Camaro SS1 with a load of options similar to mine (except missing the leather and heated/cooled seats which are not available) comes in at $38K. But . . . it's a Camaro . . . from Government Motors.
Dodge? A Challenger R/T Plus is the model. Can be optioned to be pretty similar to the Mustang at $38K. But this is the 5.7L, 375 HP Hemi, a long way from the Hellcat, and a handling pig.
There are a double-handful of FWD sedans that can be had for this price, including Ford's own Fusion ($33K loaded) and Lincoln MKZ ($38K comparably equipped.) But . . . those are sedans! Family cars!
And I am running out of options. If I really chose to not buy a Mustang, I would probably get a Fusion or something like that. I am stretching to get what I really want (I don't want an EB, even though I thought really hard about going that way) and it looks like the 2015 GT is about the best deal going.
I have absolutely no regrets!
Did I miss something?
I'm sure an M4 is an exciting drive. At $75,000, it should be. And ZL1 Camaros and Hellcat Challengers have their attractions (I wouldn't want either one, frankly) but at $60 grand, they are competition for a Mustang that hasn't yet been introduced.
Just for fun, I went looking for what I could buy for the same $39K MSRP as my car on order. The list isn't very encouraging, and the Mustang looks pretty darn awesome in comparison.
BMW? A fairly stripped 228i is the best you can do. Almost any M235i is nearly $50 grand. The 3-series and 4-series start in the mid 40s and head quickly north. Strike this brand.
Audi? A stripped A5 is $40K even. With a few options and an AT, it's $45K. Wow. I guess I could get an A3 into the budget, but why?
Chevrolet? A Camaro SS1 with a load of options similar to mine (except missing the leather and heated/cooled seats which are not available) comes in at $38K. But . . . it's a Camaro . . . from Government Motors.
Dodge? A Challenger R/T Plus is the model. Can be optioned to be pretty similar to the Mustang at $38K. But this is the 5.7L, 375 HP Hemi, a long way from the Hellcat, and a handling pig.
There are a double-handful of FWD sedans that can be had for this price, including Ford's own Fusion ($33K loaded) and Lincoln MKZ ($38K comparably equipped.) But . . . those are sedans! Family cars!
And I am running out of options. If I really chose to not buy a Mustang, I would probably get a Fusion or something like that. I am stretching to get what I really want (I don't want an EB, even though I thought really hard about going that way) and it looks like the 2015 GT is about the best deal going.
I have absolutely no regrets!
Did I miss something?
Sponsored