It's going to be really important that you drive a GT before making any kind of decision based on dyno claims. Your boosted Evo has a huge advantage at higher altitudes (like much of CO) and the Mustang may be wheezing in that thin air.
While I'm usually not into the Evo/Sti/WRX/Focus RS kind of scene, it's impossible not to admit the amazing capabilities that these little sedan/hatches have. I get the appeal...and it's a very different brand of fun from a V8/RWD muscle car.
Haha won't deny it when everything is going right they are a blast of a car to drive but you always have to be preparedThere's something I forgot about boost leaks! Nothing like randomly losing power. And having to tighten clamps all the time. Those clamps by the intercooler and by the turbo are a peach huh?
:cheers:That turbo spool is something that has to be felt. A lot of fun. Turbo cars are just a pain. Maintance wise. Which was my original point.Haha won't deny it when everything is going right they are a blast of a car to drive but you always have to be prepared![]()
Do you know anything about cars??? Displacement doesn't mean a thing? Really??? Try adding 8 pounds of boost to your little 4 banger. What would that get you? About 260WHP? Try adding 8 pounds of boost to a Much larger displacement V8. What do you get? 550-600WHP? Come on kid just stop. I've did both types of engines. Your doing things the hard way with the 4 bangers.It's too bad most of you guys still live in the 60s and 70s thinking only v8s make good, reliable, power. Maybe one day you'll realize displacement doesn't mean a thing. Hopefully somebody brings you down a peg with your superiority complex.
Outside of the 2015 ecobooms, the only ones blowing motors have really aggressive tunes. That's it. The engine is reliable and will hold up. Why would Ford produce an engine to hold up for only 50k miles. You'd be a dumbass to believe that.
Exactly. $ for $ if you want power. There is no replacement for displacement. It's simple physics.Do you know anything about cars??? Displacement doesn't mean a thing? Really??? Try adding 8 pounds of boost to your little 4 banger. What would that get you? About 260WHP? Try adding 8 pounds of boost to a Much larger displacement V8. What do you get? 550-600WHP? Come on kid just stop. I've did both types of engines. Your doing things the hard way with the 4 bangers.
No shit sherlock. I was referring to a turbo 4 compared to an n/a v8.Do you know anything about cars??? Displacement doesn't mean a thing? Really??? Try adding 8 pounds of boost to your little 4 banger. What would that get you? About 260WHP? Try adding 8 pounds of boost to a Much larger displacement V8. What do you get? 550-600WHP? Come on kid just stop. I've did both types of engines. Your doing things the hard way with the 4 bangers.
So displacement does mean something huh dipshit? And your still stuck with your tiny little limited engine. Just spend the money up front and quit trying to play catch up to a stock GT. Your throwing 2000 dollars worth of mods at being "AS FAST" as a GT. And you PISS your warranty away on a silly little motor that might explode! Your never going to win. The GT owner ads a 400 dollar tune and boom you just lost again. Now what? If your buying or building a car strictly to go fast. Don't start with 2.0 liters of displacement! And don't talk that dollar for dollar crap. Makes you sound like the ricer. I'm pretty sure you are! Dollar for dollar. I could mod a 35 year old fox body to destroy your EB for about 7 grand!:headbonk:No shit sherlock. I was referring to a turbo 4 compared to an n/a v8.
Dollar for dollar, my eco can kill a stock GT for cheaper than the cost of that GT.
Comments like these are when these threads need to be locked..:lol:No shit sherlock. I was referring to a turbo 4 compared to an n/a v8.
Dollar for dollar, my eco can kill a stock GT for cheaper than the cost of that GT.