Sponsored

Ford Inspector for Warranty Repair-Update:Warranty Denied Claim Due to Off Road Racing

RTFM

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2022
Threads
4
Messages
265
Reaction score
392
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
Vehicle(s)
2022 Mach 1 premium 6MT ER
Who would have thought it was a scam?

IMG_4244.jpeg


I still managed to talk myself into a 10-year ESP with electronic package and all. But the Mach1 ESP prices are *much* lower than the GT350 prices so the temptation is easy to afford. What’s the justification for the difference in price if not to account for extra track use on the GT350?
 
OP
OP

mikedahammer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2017
Threads
16
Messages
138
Reaction score
445
Location
Virginia
Vehicle(s)
GT350
This makes the situation even more frustrating. Ford has a definition in which they refer to racing in the context of motorsport, but the ESP cant use that definition? So the arbitrator uses "functioning at top speed," which has an example of "people racing for safety" & "mind was racing," not even a motorsport example. So the top speed of the car is X and you were a few mph under, you weren't technically at top speed were you? So unless you hit the limiter in 6th gear, shouldn't they approve you claim because you weren't at "top speed?"

OP I'm sorry that you got the crap end of this. My entire opinion of Ford has changed drastically after this ordeal. I think my Mach1 may be my last Ford vehicle.

If you watched the arbitration I think you may become more unhinged.
 

v guy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2018
Threads
8
Messages
78
Reaction score
31
Location
Syracuse
First Name
RP
Vehicle(s)
99 SVT
Unhinged by the decision?

I have been around racing for way too long...blown engines wrecked vehicles are the norm..you all know it.........there is no free lunch, but you DID in the past get SOME repairs out of Ford.

Gas Ronda used to go thru trans all the time.


What gets me, is the very notion that you thought that you believed that you bought an unbreakable slot car, with bulletproof armor......and that Ford was the Pillsbury dough-boy, and you found a way to go racing for free.

People buy HP vehicles all the time and have for 60 years..............and some just profile on the streets. I lived thru the muscle car era of the 1960's........
Stuff breaks, always has, always will.

Drag race much? Rally autocross much?

It is a very high perf vehicle and I have driven one on track..........risky risky..........$$$$

That is why I now have a "disposable" Track car I break it at my expense.


Get a track car.

My very first failures on my new '68 Torino GT 4 speed back in '69 was the 9" rear...changed them a few times more. Warranty denied.

My '87 Mustang GT lost the rear 2 times under warranty, but the last fix ..I had buy the new gears and kit..they did the labor.

In between 1964 and 2024.. people have been fixing HP vehicles themselves as normal.

The old ten year 100,00 mile warranties of the '70's were a joke.
 

2fast2focus

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2021
Threads
7
Messages
153
Reaction score
219
Location
10940
First Name
Andres
Vehicle(s)
2022 Mustang Mach 1
I don’t think OP thought he bought an unbreakable car. If he did, why would he buy the ESP? If anything OP knows the car could break and bought the ESP as a form of insurance against those breaks.
 

Sponsored

luc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2018
Threads
16
Messages
1,804
Reaction score
1,959
Location
CA
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT with PP
Unhinged by the decision?

Children, I have been around racing for way too long...blown engines wrecked vehicles are the norm..you all know it.........there is no free lunch, but you DID in the past get SOME repairs out of Ford.

Gas Ronda used to go thru trans all the time.


What gets me, is the very notion that you thought that you believed that you bought an unbreakable slot car, with bulletproof armor......and that Ford was the Pillsbury dough-boy, and you found a way to go racing for free.

People buy HP vehicles all the time and have for 60 years..............and some just profile on the streets. I lived thru the muscle car era of the 1960's........
Stuff breaks, always has, always will.

Drag race much? Rally autocross much?

It is a very high perf vehicle and I have driven one on track..........risky risky..........$$$$

That is why I now have a "disposable" Track car I break it at my expense.


Get a track car.

My very first failures on my new '68 Torino GT 4 speed back in '69 was the 9" rear...changed them a few times more. Warranty denied.

My '87 Mustang GT lost the rear 2 times under warranty, but the last fix ..I had buy the new gears and kit..they did the labor.

In between 1964 and 2024.. people have been fixing HP vehicles themselves as normal.

The old ten year 100,00 mile warranties of the '70's were a joke.
I couldn’t agree more with you
You have to pay to play and there not such thing as a free lunch
While i feel bad for the op, it’s a bit naive to believe that you can track your car on somebody else dime
Yes ford and the esp are a bit deceptive but no different than comparing the perfect, mouth watering mc donald burger in an advertising picture, to what you get when you order one
And btw, was a recent lawsuit about the burger/picture and guess who won?
Not the customer
 
Last edited:

MAGS1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2020
Threads
50
Messages
5,947
Reaction score
9,022
Location
Somewhere in Middle America
First Name
Mark
Vehicle(s)
2022 Mustang GT
Aside from OPs issue, this thread should be mandatory reading for geniuses that throw the might Magnusson-Moss act thinking Ford has to prove something when they're tuned / modded car goes to shit. Sure they do. LOLOL.
Except Mag-Moss clearly states that the manufacturer must prove an aftermarket part caused the failure being claimed under warranty. So, yes, consumers do have a backstop they can rely on there.

It’s an entirely separate issue than what OP went through, it was a matter of where OP’s car was and what he was doing in said location (or purported to do as ruled by the arbitrator) that caused denial. Mag-Moss says zero about tracking/racing. So you can’t compare the two IMO.
 
OP
OP

mikedahammer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2017
Threads
16
Messages
138
Reaction score
445
Location
Virginia
Vehicle(s)
GT350
Unhinged by the decision?

I have been around racing for way too long...blown engines wrecked vehicles are the norm..you all know it.........there is no free lunch, but you DID in the past get SOME repairs out of Ford.

Gas Ronda used to go thru trans all the time.


What gets me, is the very notion that you thought that you believed that you bought an unbreakable slot car, with bulletproof armor......and that Ford was the Pillsbury dough-boy, and you found a way to go racing for free.

People buy HP vehicles all the time and have for 60 years..............and some just profile on the streets. I lived thru the muscle car era of the 1960's........
Stuff breaks, always has, always will.

Drag race much? Rally autocross much?

It is a very high perf vehicle and I have driven one on track..........risky risky..........$$$$

That is why I now have a "disposable" Track car I break it at my expense.


Get a track car.

My very first failures on my new '68 Torino GT 4 speed back in '69 was the 9" rear...changed them a few times more. Warranty denied.

My '87 Mustang GT lost the rear 2 times under warranty, but the last fix ..I had buy the new gears and kit..they did the labor.

In between 1964 and 2024.. people have been fixing HP vehicles themselves as normal.

The old ten year 100,00 mile warranties of the '70's were a joke.
I don’t have a problem with your opinion and obviously you haven’t been following along as to the purpose of this thread or you wouldn’t have word vomited useless stuff.

No one is wanting a free lunch and I am not looking for someone to change my diaper. However yours might be need a tending to if this thread triggers you.

The issue here isn’t me or anyone else that purchased these cars or with anyone who purchased a service plan.

If manufacturers don’t want to offer certain components to be covered by using it at the track or they want to limit how the car is to be used then just state that. It really isn’t more complicated than that. Just list the exclusions. Simple really.

In my experience running with various hpde groups most people that attend do not have a fully dedicated track car UNTIL something either breaks or they got a deal on something or they sunk a bunch of money in their car fixing it.

The people I have run with over the years are all pretty laid back. However if you show up to an scca or nasa event that has a race or time trials and hpde on the same day then that is different crowd than the chin, trackdaze, track attack, etc. I prefer the latter as going to the track is relaxing for me.

I do hpde because I enjoy driving the car without the fear of hurting someone or going to jail. I have zero interest in racing and your rant is exactly why I avoid those types of drivers on track and avoid events where people think they have something to prove to themselves or someone else. That’s not a sneak diss at you we are just there for different reasons and go to the track for different reason. Neither of us are wrong.

I am not looking for people to agree or disagree I am merely sharing my experience. You are free to draw your own conclusions but try to keep it on topic so people don’t have to filter through trash. The dislike button is your friend.
 

Finally21

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2021
Threads
8
Messages
274
Reaction score
533
Location
Minnesota
Vehicle(s)
2017 Shelby GT350 Race Red (All original)
Unhinged by the decision?

Children, I have been around racing for way too long...blown engines wrecked vehicles are the norm..you all know it.........there is no free lunch, but you DID in the past get SOME repairs out of Ford.

Gas Ronda used to go thru trans all the time.


What gets me, is the very notion that you thought that you believed that you bought an unbreakable slot car, with bulletproof armor......and that Ford was the Pillsbury dough-boy, and you found a way to go racing for free.

People buy HP vehicles all the time and have for 60 years..............and some just profile on the streets. I lived thru the muscle car era of the 1960's........
Stuff breaks, always has, always will.

Drag race much? Rally autocross much?

It is a very high perf vehicle and I have driven one on track..........risky risky..........$$$$

That is why I now have a "disposable" Track car I break it at my expense.


Get a track car.

My very first failures on my new '68 Torino GT 4 speed back in '69 was the 9" rear...changed them a few times more. Warranty denied.

My '87 Mustang GT lost the rear 2 times under warranty, but the last fix ..I had buy the new gears and kit..they did the labor.

In between 1964 and 2024.. people have been fixing HP vehicles themselves as normal.

The old ten year 100,00 mile warranties of the '70's were a joke.
I'll say it, v guy is an ass.
 

Sponsored

luc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2018
Threads
16
Messages
1,804
Reaction score
1,959
Location
CA
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT with PP
I don’t have a problem with your opinion and obviously you haven’t been following along as to the purpose of this thread or you wouldn’t have word vomited useless stuff.

No one is wanting a free lunch and I am not looking for someone to change my diaper. However yours might be need a tending to if this thread triggers you.

The issue here isn’t me or anyone else that purchased these cars or with anyone who purchased a service plan.

If manufacturers don’t want to offer certain components to be covered by using it at the track or they want to limit how the car is to be used then just state that. It really isn’t more complicated than that. Just list the exclusions. Simple really.

In my experience running with various hpde groups most people that attend do not have a fully dedicated track car UNTIL something either breaks or they got a deal on something or they sunk a bunch of money in their car fixing it.

The people I have run with over the years are all pretty laid back. However if you show up to an scca or nasa event that has a race or time trials and hpde on the same day then that is different crowd than the chin, trackdaze, track attack, etc. I prefer the latter as going to the track is relaxing for me.

I do hpde because I enjoy driving the car without the fear of hurting someone or going to jail. I have zero interest in racing and your rant is exactly why I avoid those types of drivers on track and avoid events where people think they have something to prove to themselves or someone else. That’s not a sneak diss at you we are just there for different reasons and go to the track for different reason. Neither of us are wrong.

I am not looking for people to agree or disagree I am merely sharing my experience. You are free to draw your own conclusions but try to keep it on topic so people don’t have to filter through trash. The dislike button is your friend.
You’re 100% right ,manufacturers should be more upfront about which activities are covered or not and to which point
They simply don’t do it because it would not be to their benefits or advantages.
it’s simply the way most businesses do business.
that is as old than commerce has existed, centuries ago, Roman even coined a phrase about it : Caveat Emptor
In your case that would mean asking , in writing, before buying the esp, if the type of activity (driving at a high rate of speed on a racetrack, that you wanted to do was covered or not.
and obviously doing that through text or email to get a written answer
You assumed that it was covered…
You have been really a gentleman through all this thread and i feel bad for you but you do bear some responsibility for not applying the Caveat Emptor principle
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

mikedahammer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2017
Threads
16
Messages
138
Reaction score
445
Location
Virginia
Vehicle(s)
GT350
You’re 100% right ,manufacturers should be more upfront about which activities are covered or not and to which point
They simply don’t do it because it would not be to their benefits or advantages.
it’s simply the way most businesses do business.
that is as old than commerce has existed, centuries ago, Roman even coined a phrase about it : Caveat Emptor
In your case that would mean asking , in writing, before buying the esp, if the type of activity (driving at a high rate of speed on a racetrack, that you wanted to do was covered or not.
and obviously doing that through text or email to get a written answer
You assumed that it was covered…
You have been really a gentleman through all this thread and i feel bad for you but you do bear some responsibility for not applying the Caveat Emptor principle
You are also missing the point. Hindsight is always 20/20 and I have learned from this experience and I am hoping other people do as well. I am not looking for condolences or accolades. This was a principal of the matter for me.

However, you shouldn't assume I just purchased it without doing my homework. As you can probably tell that is not my style. I did ask. I was told it was an extension of the original warranty. In the owner's supplement it says get more coverage for your vehicle buy Ford promoting the ESP. We have already beat that horse to death. But, even if I got it in writing it would not supersede the signed contract and getting it added as addendum would be impossible.

In the arbitration they acknowledge you can go to the track and it doesn't void the warranty but if the failure is due to track use it will be denied. My problem may or may not have been from track use and they didn't have to prove it. See how awkward that is? How can they prove your failure was due to the track and not from something else; they can't and neither can I. Just because the failure occurs at the track doesn't mean that was the cause of failure. If my radio stops working at the track is that because of track use. It's silly.

It really does just go back to you either cover failures or you do not. Just make the contract transparent like any other "track" clause in any other contract, warranty, or insurance. If you asked them right now if track use is allowed they will say yes. If you ask if racing is allowed they will say no. Ask them to define racing so you know what you can and cannot do in writing they won't. It really isn't difficult to say what you do and do not want to cover.
 

Buldawg76

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2022
Threads
3
Messages
759
Reaction score
569
Location
Alabama,USA
First Name
Mike
Vehicle(s)
2020 Mustang Ecoboost, Rapid Red Premium
I couldn’t agree more with you
You have to pay to play and there not such thing as a free lunch
While i feel bad for the op, it’s a bit naive to believe that you can track your car on somebody else dime
Yes ford and the esp are a bit deceptive but no different than comparing the perfect, mouth watering mc donald burger in an advertising picture, to what you get when you order one
And btw, was a recent lawsuit about the burger/picture and guess who won?
Not the customer
Except many years ago a person drove into a MacDonalds drive thru for a cup of HOT coffee and proceeded to put it between her legs while driving away and when it spilled and burned her, she sued and WON. What idiot puts a cup of hot coffee between their legs while driving and thinks they will not get burned when it spills.

Guess who won, the customer.

BD
 

BlkMach10510

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2023
Threads
19
Messages
439
Reaction score
761
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2023 Mach 1
Except many years ago a person drove into a MacDonalds drive thru for a cup of HOT coffee and proceeded to put it between her legs while driving away and when it spilled and burned her, she sued and WON. What idiot puts a cup of hot coffee between their legs while driving and thinks they will not get burned when it spills.

Guess who won, the customer.

BD
I just reread her story again and she was the passenger so she had both hands free.
 

v guy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2018
Threads
8
Messages
78
Reaction score
31
Location
Syracuse
First Name
RP
Vehicle(s)
99 SVT
As a guy who worked in the legal profession, some who have been Arbitrators late in life........when I heard this claim was going to Arbitration.....................I asked the question of drinking Lawyers at the Elks Club and Yacht Club...to a person. the said...... "RACING?" GTFO....!!

A PRECEDENT CANNOT BE SET that would destroy Ford from 100,00 such claims a year.

You were doomed from the start......90% of the population if asked the same thing would be aghast...........

As Graham Hill once said..."racing is expensive..how fast to you want to go?"

I think ford did well by you, overall.

The Ford Racing School cars that are for sale were maintained throughout their careers, being driven by amateurs, and Ford has pretty good idea of parts durability..............AND WHAT DRIVING STYLE BREAKS PARTS...

Young man, examine yourself first.
Sponsored

 
 




Top