ShelbyGT350
Shelby GT350
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2013
- Threads
- 31
- Messages
- 371
- Reaction score
- 84
- Location
- Escondido, CA
- Vehicle(s)
- 1970 Mach 1 351C Shaker
The issue with a Whipple, as Shelby American has found, is that with that much HP, they require you to upgrade the half-shafts, put in a single-piece driveshaft, and upgrade the hubs with longer studs (more $$$$). Now you know where us moderate lead-foot drivers are coming from. Some of us are not all about brute horsepower, but drivability, longevity, and not breaking the car. If folks want a Whipple, fine, but don't bad-mouth the competition. They should know what they are getting into - tell them the WHOLE story with Whipple.Maybe an improvement over previous releases, sound alike a talented guy. But in general, essentially everyone struggles because aftermarket tools. You can get one cal to work but take 3-4 tries on the next as aftermarket tools give you access to roughly 5-10% of the actual cal data. Meaning here are always items you can't see that change. Doesn't matter how talented you are, unless you have oem tools, the proper resources and the ability. There are so many versions of cals, you can't test them all so there is always an unknown, which requires cals to be modified routinely. Even Lund and PBD, by far the most successful of the custom tunes require multiple versions. just the life many deal with in he aftermarket.
Sponsored

