Sponsored

EB stage 1 Datalogs

Speedbump

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2016
Threads
24
Messages
138
Reaction score
66
Location
Oregon
Vehicle(s)
None yet
Took my car out and did some logs because it doesn't seem to run the way it should, I've been talking with their calibration team and have sent these to them. The car runs 92 plus a full can of Octanium per tank. I cant decipher the logs but a friend said they show more knock than they should. The car also cuts out at times and other times it doesnt hit boost until 5000rpm
Links:
https://datazap.me/u/speedbump/log-1581294186?log=0&data=43
https://datazap.me/u/speedbump/log-1581294744?log=0&data=43
https://datazap.me/u/speedbump/log-1581294105?log=0&data=43
https://datazap.me/u/speedbump/log-1581294803?log=0&data=43
https://datazap.me/u/speedbump/log-1581294510?log=0&data=43
Sponsored

 

Patriot Six

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2019
Threads
4
Messages
201
Reaction score
106
Location
Temecula, CA
Vehicle(s)
2020 Mustang GT
EB tune is garbage especially on 91. I’m in the process of doing a Lund tune on my EB Stage 2 for that very reason.
 
OP
OP

Speedbump

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2016
Threads
24
Messages
138
Reaction score
66
Location
Oregon
Vehicle(s)
None yet
EB tune is garbage especially on 91. I’m in the process of doing a Lund tune on my EB Stage 2 for that very reason.
I really don’t want to go away from their tune, just for warranty. Maybe their 93 will be better, or they can get this one working right.
 

Patriot Six

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2019
Threads
4
Messages
201
Reaction score
106
Location
Temecula, CA
Vehicle(s)
2020 Mustang GT
93 tune was better on the Stage 2, but there is still random surging and very little boost until about 90% pedal travel. Being limited by emissions has the tune doing weird things.
 

Sponsored

OP
OP

Speedbump

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2016
Threads
24
Messages
138
Reaction score
66
Location
Oregon
Vehicle(s)
None yet
93 tune was better on the Stage 2, but there is still random surging and very little boost until about 90% pedal travel. Being limited by emissions has the tune doing weird things.
This is exactly what I was experiencing. I emailed them and they said the surging is “not a common issue”. It’s all over this site. The pedal travel is ridiculous
 

Patriot Six

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2019
Threads
4
Messages
201
Reaction score
106
Location
Temecula, CA
Vehicle(s)
2020 Mustang GT
Unfortunately, because of CARB certification, they won’t revise their tunes. I’m going with Lund so I can get my money’s worth and actually enjoy driving the car.
 

Zinc03svt

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2018
Threads
30
Messages
2,337
Reaction score
1,272
Location
usa
Vehicle(s)
stang
No shit...? They all suck....ED calibrations. Too much knock and zero tcu limiters removed. Welcome to the club.
 

hlfbkd420

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2019
Threads
14
Messages
2,249
Reaction score
2,405
Location
SW 'Merica
First Name
Bilbo Hicks
Vehicle(s)
2015 KIA Sorento SXL
can we get relevant info? What year is your car?
 

Sponsored
OP
OP

Speedbump

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2016
Threads
24
Messages
138
Reaction score
66
Location
Oregon
Vehicle(s)
None yet
can we get relevant info? What year is your car?
If that’s the only relevant info I missed I did pretty good. it’s a 2019. It’s an A10. Velocity blue. All options except for active exhaust. Instead it has AWE touring.
 

Burkey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Threads
87
Messages
5,524
Reaction score
3,512
Location
Australia
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
Vehicle Showcase
1
Took my car out and did some logs because it doesn't seem to run the way it should, I've been talking with their calibration team and have sent these to them. The car runs 92 plus a full can of Octanium per tank. I cant decipher the logs but a friend said they show more knock than they should. The car also cuts out at times and other times it doesnt hit boost until 5000rpm
Links:
https://datazap.me/u/speedbump/log-1581294186?log=0&data=43
https://datazap.me/u/speedbump/log-1581294744?log=0&data=43
https://datazap.me/u/speedbump/log-1581294105?log=0&data=43
https://datazap.me/u/speedbump/log-1581294803?log=0&data=43
https://datazap.me/u/speedbump/log-1581294510?log=0&data=43
What are you logging with?
There’s a lot of PIDS being used that aren’t necessary and it seems to me that they are slowing the accuracy of the data. Rpm for example is showing in steps, where it should be smoothly transitioning with rise and fall.
 

Burkey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Threads
87
Messages
5,524
Reaction score
3,512
Location
Australia
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
Vehicle Showcase
1
10 seconds of one of your logs. Rpm and time on the plot.
DD69273D-2B4D-4841-9C32-A0D8944B45C0.png
 
OP
OP

Speedbump

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2016
Threads
24
Messages
138
Reaction score
66
Location
Oregon
Vehicle(s)
None yet
Using the SCT/BDX that came with the car and my laptop. The datalog was done using the Config file that Edelbrocks calibration department emailed me.
Sponsored

 
 








Top