SolarFlare
Well-Known Member
I’ve never been in a race where I’ve said to myself about the other car, “uuuffff that torque got me!”
Sponsored
I think you might be mistaking “bottom end” for peak torque.had 2 cars with positive displacement blowers and 2 with centrifugals and both centrifugals made more hp but less tq .I had more fun and the overall faster cars were my centrifugals ..never was my car slower down low or anywhere in the power band with a centrifugal nor did they heat soak and lose performance like my PD cars did after 3 or 4 runs in a row ..
If you were coming from an NA/e85 setup and converting to centri/98, it’s entirely likely that you’d notice something missing up to a certain point. Given that this isn’t your situation, I don’t see that you’d find it missing anything more than you are already.I have read some posts where people running different centri's have commented on a seat of the pants felt decrease in low-end torque.
Maintaining the stock low end torque with a centri would be OK, since the mid-range and top-end would be there. Loosing low end torque would not be OK.
I am familiar with the "torque boosters" that are available for the Paxton/Vortech set ups and I understand how they work and see the benefits, albeit with an increase in inlet temp.
Would like to know if in fact anyone has a dyno graph before and after on Paxton/Vortech/Procharger on the low end of the RPM scale, with our without a torque booster.
This comment kind of makes little sense. If you both start in the optimal gear and punch it the car with more power, lower weight, better aero, and better gearing will win as with any other race. If you are worried about racing from a 30 mph roll in 4th gear then you would probably lose because the other cars are automatics and would downshift to put the car in the right power band...I'd like to ask you Centri guys a question. I live in an area where there are mainly Hellcats and Vettes. How did these races play out? Many of these will be from a dig. Some will be from a roll. I want to know if you had to play catch up.
Forgive my ignorance on this but i just haven't seen this play out.
My car runs well with the smallest blower available for a coyote. If a hellcat or Vette is quicker/faster, it's a bad bitch. No love lost. Bottom line, I ain't scared.I'd like to ask you Centri guys a question. I live in an area where there are mainly Hellcats and Vettes. How did these races play out? Many of these will be from a dig. Some will be from a roll. I want to know if you had to play catch up.
Forgive my ignorance on this but i just haven't seen this play out.
look years ago a centri on a 9:1.1 compression engine with 8-10 psi was SOGGY !! these are 12:1.1 engines with 10-11 psi i can tell you they are anything but soft . Also they spend little time below 2500 rpm so it really does not matter .revinto7 and others,
Thanks, that's good info. I realize there's a trade off with anything. Just didn't want the lower torque production to be excessively "soggy". I have built and helped build a bunch of SBC's in the past and some of those with high lift and high duration cam profiles, coupled with the a less than idea converter and rear gear were not much fun on the street. This is different from the topic, but in mind is possibly a similar comparison to the centri.
I was about to order a Whipple, but I know this is going to require lots more investment into cradle supports, wider wheels and wider, stickier tires, etc. I know a centri will require some additional upgrades as well, but I like the idea of the "hit" coming on more progressively.
Heat soak is another matter as well since I live in a hot, humid region. I know Whipple and EB have addressed this better than any other PD set up, but the centri's seem to be better in this respect.
Appreciate the input.
agreed your car is no slouch !!!My car runs well with the smallest blower available for a coyote. If a hellcat or Vette is quicker/faster, it's a bad bitch. No love lost. Bottom line, I ain't scared.