IPOGT
Well-Known Member
Please play nice. Isn’t it stressful enough out there? I assure y’all, no one hates anyone, well, not here I think.
Sponsored
Last edited:
bullshit. I never said "replacing a diff with a trans-axel means NVH will go DOWN".It's one of the many incorrect things you wrote/posted.
Don't kid yourself.....it's all been quoted.
This is the right answerNah, I think it’s over, the next gen will be fully electric, totally different setup for suspension, battery, frame etc.
this is it.
I never said "replacing a diff with a trans-axel means NVH will go DOWN".
.....a transaxle in the rear would simultaneously absorb all the NVH and shock currently being transferred to just a IRS pumpkin.......the bigger heavier mass can't be shocked as easily as the smaller pumpkin which means......
In your mind, certainly. That's clearly how it works......in your mind......keep pretending like adding mass isn't something car companies have been doing to reduce NVH transfer for years, though.
This clearly demonstrates you don't have a fucking clue what a trans-axel is.now imagine a transaxle, bolted to a diff, doing that.
What deadline?The EV deadline is 2035
Are you seriously begging to get a ban? Just stop your BS already. You want to argue with OP, fine, send him a PM. We would like to get on with the topic.In your mind, certainly. That's clearly how it works......in your mind.
In the real world, no, car companies do NOT add mass to reduce NVH transfer. They're fighting bloat and MPG/emissions issues as it is, and weight has everything to do with thatfight.
That's also some nice strawman arguing. But it's duly noted.
What's hysterical, is that in going back to quote where you did exactly that, you also demonstrate that you don't understand what a trans-axel is;
This clearly demonstrates you don't have a fucking clue what a trans-axel is.
This forum improved a lot after adding him to the ignore list.Hey Lee, can you please stop the back and forth with @KingKona? You’re wasting your time, and ours, arguing with him. It’s pointless and is ruining your thread.
Interesting. I didn't know about this. I wonder if states here in the US will follow.The EV deadline is 2035
All of Europe and California have a ban effective 2035, 8 other states have similar measures.What deadline?
Several states have enacted a law banning the sale of new ICE vehicles by 2035. Similar to how we all drive California emissions compliant vehicles, even if some states do not push an EV only law, innovation and sale of new designs of ICE vehicles will die everywhere.What deadline?
What states are requiring electric cars by 2035?What deadline?
I've owned a couple of C6 Vettes, they still have wheelhop even with a transaxle.did you guys even read my post or do you just not get why a transaxle in the rear would simultaneously absorb all the NVH and shock currently being transferred to just a IRS pumpkin (which tears WEAK factory bushings under stock power) which induces an ungodly amount of wheel hop whilst also moving a ton of weight to the rear of the car?
think of all the big goofy rubber vibration absorbing weights on modern cars.
now imagine a transaxle, bolted to a diff, doing that. This means the bigger heavier mass can't be shocked as easily as the smaller pumpkin which means A. the smaller vibrations just get absorbed and B since it needs bigger bushings for the larger unit and the whole unit must be moved before the bushings take more load.... you're using physics to decrease NVH instead of just pretending like the shit job ford did on these bushings is fine.
there's a reason serious performance luxury cars use transaxles even when the engine is in the front.