Sponsored

5.0 Dyno Chart Compilation

Orange_cru$h

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2015
Threads
2
Messages
62
Reaction score
5
Location
PR
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT CO Premium Pkg 6A 3.15 18"
Ok, went to the dyno last night. 2015 GT Auto, Lund 93, JLT, Hurst Axleback.
For some reason my car dynoed higher on 3rd than 4th. Include the results for the different corrections.

381 Uncorrected without any variables
389 Sae
397 Std

Dyno 381 uncor med.webp


389 dyno sae med.jpg


Dyno 397 std med.webp
Sponsored

 

mnmike59

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2016
Threads
20
Messages
284
Reaction score
74
Location
2 hours South of BIR
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP
GT350 Intake comparison

I installed Kooks long tubes with Green cats, Gt350 Intake manifold, Gt 350 Throttle body with a JLT GT350 CAI. Car has Borla touring axle backs with X pipe. My tuner hadn't done much work with the new S550 Coyote so he contacted Lund. and after a week :doh: of waiting finally had a tune sent.
I wasn't real happy with the overall Horsepower gains, BUT I'm thrilled about the Torque, I've been reading a ton about the LOSS of torque, But I had a small gain, Right where I want it! This was tuned with 91 octane. 93 is not readily available here so i did 91 for now. I'll look at E85 (maybe) I hear that E85 fuel is never consistent octane.:shrug:

The comparison
 
Last edited:

GSLSE20B

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2015
Threads
4
Messages
1,005
Reaction score
289
Location
Fair Oaks , Ca
Vehicle(s)
16 SHADOW BLACK GTPP
I installed Kooks long tubes with Green cats, Gt350 Intake manifold, Gt 350 Throttle body with a JLT GT350 CAI. Car has Borla touring axle backs with X pipe. My tuner hadn't done much work with the new S550 Coyote so he contacted Lund. and after a week :doh: of waiting finally had a tune sent.
I wasn't real happy with the overall Horsepower gains, BUT I'm thrilled about the Torque, I've been reading a ton about the LOSS of torque, But I had a small gain, Right where I want it! This was tuned with 91 octane. 93 is not readily available here so i did 91 for now. I'll look at E85 (maybe) I hear that E85 fuel is never consistent octane.:shrug:

The comparison
most e85 maps will be for 65% so you will be fine
 

Moddiction

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2015
Threads
82
Messages
1,806
Reaction score
341
Location
Mooresville, NC
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP
Retuned my car with E85. Comparison is 93/E85

Made 416whp and 380tq.

JLT intake, Corsa axle back and custom SCT Lund tune.

DECEE444-78EB-4B04-A76D-0D9AC7EEA2DA_zpsyfxmggle.webp
 

Sponsored

Jay159866

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2015
Threads
22
Messages
398
Reaction score
79
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT 1966 Coupe
Cat-less Stainless Power Long Tube Headers
H pipe with Magnaflow Comps
JLT intake
Lund 93 tune
Manual 15 GT

First Run: 427
Second Run: 431
:ford:

 

armykyle1 [HACKED ACCOUNT

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Threads
74
Messages
1,849
Reaction score
625
Location
Gulf Coast
Vehicle(s)
2018 GTPP premium
Steeda CAI, Steeda 93 tune, MBRP catless LTs, custom 3" exhaust back, aluminum driveshaft. 16.7k on the ticker. I'd like to see what a Gt350 mani.

420/390
FB_IMG_1475857721676.jpg
FB_IMG_1475857638000.jpg
 

mnmike59

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2016
Threads
20
Messages
284
Reaction score
74
Location
2 hours South of BIR
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP
The torque numbers look awesome! Those will more than likely drop with the 350 IM. I believe your big torque increase is due to the LT's
 

Terminator2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2016
Threads
7
Messages
1,960
Reaction score
448
Location
Spring Hill Florida
First Name
David
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Premium
The torque numbers look awesome! Those will more than likely drop with the 350 IM. I believe your big torque increase is due to the LT's
It's uncorrected numbers though which could be making the numbers higher than SAE depending on the run conditions. Uncorrected can be lower than SAE if it's 100*, humid, or lower air pressure.
 

Sponsored

armykyle1 [HACKED ACCOUNT

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Threads
74
Messages
1,849
Reaction score
625
Location
Gulf Coast
Vehicle(s)
2018 GTPP premium
It's uncorrected numbers though which could be making the numbers higher than SAE depending on the run conditions. Uncorrected can be lower than SAE if it's 100*, humid, or lower air pressure.
It was 85ish and 90-95% humidity. I don't remember exactly. The other people who dynoed said they were down. I'm LG mad.
 

Terminator2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2016
Threads
7
Messages
1,960
Reaction score
448
Location
Spring Hill Florida
First Name
David
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Premium
It was 85ish and 90-95% humidity. I don't remember exactly. The other people who dynoed said they were down. I'm LG mad.
SAE would be about 3-4% higher in this case assuming close to sea level. If at altitude SAE would be higher still.
 

1badrz28

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 9, 2016
Threads
5
Messages
387
Reaction score
103
Location
Woodbury, MN
Vehicle(s)
2017
I installed Kooks long tubes with Green cats, Gt350 Intake manifold, Gt 350 Throttle body with a JLT GT350 CAI. Car has Borla touring axle backs with X pipe. My tuner hadn't done much work with the new S550 Coyote so he contacted Lund. and after a week :doh: of waiting finally had a tune sent.
I wasn't real happy with the overall Horsepower gains, BUT I'm thrilled about the Torque, I've been reading a ton about the LOSS of torque, But I had a small gain, Right where I want it! This was tuned with 91 octane. 93 is not readily available here so i did 91 for now. I'll look at E85 (maybe) I hear that E85 fuel is never consistent octane.:shrug:

The comparison
The BP fuel stations have 93 octane around our neck of the woods and as you know most Holiday's will have e85. I'll have the ARH headers and e85 Lund tune done by this spring. Having in auto, I won't just go to anyone around here. There are a few that lost their auto 's because the tuner wasn't tuning the transmission on the higher hp applications. I just goy my 2017 two weeks ago and only have 280 miles on it so far with the PMAS intake. I'd like to here what you et's are with that HP if you ever go down the strip.
 

mnmike59

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2016
Threads
20
Messages
284
Reaction score
74
Location
2 hours South of BIR
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP
The BP fuel stations have 93 octane around our neck of the woods and as you know most Holiday's will have e85. I'll have the ARH headers and e85 Lund tune done by this spring. Having in auto, I won't just go to anyone around here. There are a few that lost their auto 's because the tuner wasn't tuning the transmission on the higher hp applications. I just goy my 2017 two weeks ago and only have 280 miles on it so far with the PMAS intake. I'd like to here what you et's are with that HP if you ever go down the strip.
I have the 93 oct tune now with a small increase in HP. I fill up at BP's now as well. I was trying to stay with a NON Ethanol fuel, But now from what I understand, it makes no difference as the cars computer reads the fuel and adjusts accordingly.:shrug:
I don't Drag my car. I'm a road course guy.:headbang: Also I have a 6 spd manual. My next round of winter upgrades will be Oil pump gears ATI balancer, Carbon fiber drive shaft, Light weight wheels and Brake rotors.
Keep me posted on your upgrades.
Sponsored

 
 








Top