5.0 Dyno Chart Compilation

Discussion in 'V8 5.0L Engine / Mods: Bolt-ons, Exhaust, Tuning' started by 6G, Apr 2, 2016.

  1. Deep Blue

    Deep Blue Member

    First Name:
    Leo
    Vehicle(s):
    2015 Mustang GT 50 Years (A6) / Mustang #6
    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2018
    Location:
    Houston, TEXAS
    Posts:
    23
    Likes Received:
    3
    0   0   0
    Alec, I dynoed at Motorsport Technologies in Houston. From what I've researched I would expect about a 20-25 rear wheel gain with the 2018 manifold, 47# injectors, and E85 tune, putting me at 410-415 rear wheel SAE through cats. and about 10 rear wheel higher if measured by STD. What matters most to me is how I'll run at the track, hoping for some mid 11's at 115 mph+ on drag radials. Anything faster would be a gift.
     
  2. aleccesarenriquez

    aleccesarenriquez Well-Known Member

    First Name:
    Alec
    Vehicle(s):
    2017 GT PP
    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2018
    Location:
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts:
    298
    Likes Received:
    81
    Occupation:
    Engineer - Med Devices
    Rating:
    100%
    1   0   0
    Fair enough. Do you have a torque converter? Mid 11s is pretty quick. High 11s would still be pretty solid imo.
     
  3. Deep Blue

    Deep Blue Member

    First Name:
    Leo
    Vehicle(s):
    2015 Mustang GT 50 Years (A6) / Mustang #6
    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2018
    Location:
    Houston, TEXAS
    Posts:
    23
    Likes Received:
    3
    0   0   0
    It might be wishful thinking. Ran a 12.6 stock on Firestone Firehawk radials, hoping the extra power and drag radials and lighter wheels will be enough, don't plan on doing a converter.
     
  4. Nuked

    Nuked Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    2016 Triple Yellow GTPP w/Recaros
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2015
    Location:
    Morgantown, WV
    Posts:
    566
    Likes Received:
    176
    Garage Profiles:
    1
    0   0   0
    I met a gentleman at Carlisle that did 455whp on VMP's dyno that day. He was running catless longtubes, 18 manifold, Airraid intake, Lund tune and 93. Car trapped 119mph a couple of weeks ago to back up the dyno.
     
    Deep Blue likes this.
  5. aleccesarenriquez

    aleccesarenriquez Well-Known Member

    First Name:
    Alec
    Vehicle(s):
    2017 GT PP
    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2018
    Location:
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts:
    298
    Likes Received:
    81
    Occupation:
    Engineer - Med Devices
    Rating:
    100%
    1   0   0
    Just goes to show how different dynos are. It seems like the dyno you were on, for example, is ~25 whp lower than the typical dyno. Did you gather stock numbers? Wouldn't be surprised to see you around 350 if you used the same dyno and they hadn't calibrated it between then and the run for your current numbers.

    I have similar mods as you and dynod 367/327 stock and 447/376 post mods. From what I've seen, that's about 10 hp less and 20 ftlb less than a typical dyno, which makes sense for both runs.

    Moral of the story...it's just a number.

    Regardless, I do like that trap speed. What are the FBO 18 A10s trapping at?
     
  6. kris5597

    kris5597 Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    2018 Mustang GT A10
    Joined:
    May 20, 2015
    Location:
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts:
    509
    Likes Received:
    125
    0   0   0
    Depends on the dyno. However, pump e85 will not gain 10-15 whp on a FBO car, like previously mentioned. All other numbers are accurate.

    However, numbers are irrelevant.

    Kris
     
  7. kris5597

    kris5597 Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    2018 Mustang GT A10
    Joined:
    May 20, 2015
    Location:
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts:
    509
    Likes Received:
    125
    0   0   0
    126-128 with the stock manifold.
     
  8. aleccesarenriquez

    aleccesarenriquez Well-Known Member

    First Name:
    Alec
    Vehicle(s):
    2017 GT PP
    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2018
    Location:
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts:
    298
    Likes Received:
    81
    Occupation:
    Engineer - Med Devices
    Rating:
    100%
    1   0   0
    I included the gains he’d get from the tune as well since he’s on the box sct tune.

    Also those trap times are crazy for the 18s lol. Can a cj fbo 15-17 even hit that?
     
  9. kris5597

    kris5597 Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    2018 Mustang GT A10
    Joined:
    May 20, 2015
    Location:
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts:
    509
    Likes Received:
    125
    0   0   0
    Touche, I'll give you that. Probably a little more left in the calibration.

    Yes, they are very quick, its the 10r80, such a good transmission. It is hard for them to trap that high. They need weight reduction and proper fuel.
     
  10. Nuked

    Nuked Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    2016 Triple Yellow GTPP w/Recaros
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2015
    Location:
    Morgantown, WV
    Posts:
    566
    Likes Received:
    176
    Garage Profiles:
    1
    0   0   0
    I am no dyno expert or anything, but I do wonder why mine made more tq than yours, but less HP? Is it just calibration difference or ? I was always under the impression the HP figure was calculated off the TQ reading. Again, not a dyno expert by any means at all.
     
  11. kris5597

    kris5597 Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    2018 Mustang GT A10
    Joined:
    May 20, 2015
    Location:
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts:
    509
    Likes Received:
    125
    0   0   0
    You can't compare dynos. The number one person gets compared to another from a different dyno, location, etc. is completely non comparable. You can only compare on the EXACT same dyno. A dyno is a tool used to display horsepower and to see changes from a calibration adjustment, only for before and after.

    Kris
     
  12. Nuked

    Nuked Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    2016 Triple Yellow GTPP w/Recaros
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2015
    Location:
    Morgantown, WV
    Posts:
    566
    Likes Received:
    176
    Garage Profiles:
    1
    0   0   0
    I get that part, I was referencing this delta of hp to tq on my dyno vs his
     
  13. aleccesarenriquez

    aleccesarenriquez Well-Known Member

    First Name:
    Alec
    Vehicle(s):
    2017 GT PP
    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2018
    Location:
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts:
    298
    Likes Received:
    81
    Occupation:
    Engineer - Med Devices
    Rating:
    100%
    1   0   0
    If we have the same mods and they pulled to the same rpm, it is strange. We would have to overlay our torque graphs but I would guess that you made more peak torque at 4500 rpm (I think that’s where most of us peak with similar mods) but somehow I made more torque at a higher rpm. Either that or they didn’t pull to 7200 for you.

    Dynos are just too unpredictable. Our number differences are pretty irrelevant

    Edit: do you have your graph?
     
  14. Nuked

    Nuked Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    2016 Triple Yellow GTPP w/Recaros
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2015
    Location:
    Morgantown, WV
    Posts:
    566
    Likes Received:
    176
    Garage Profiles:
    1
    0   0   0
    It is a page back.

    My peak TQ was indeed at or around 4500rpm.
     
  15. aleccesarenriquez

    aleccesarenriquez Well-Known Member

    First Name:
    Alec
    Vehicle(s):
    2017 GT PP
    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2018
    Location:
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts:
    298
    Likes Received:
    81
    Occupation:
    Engineer - Med Devices
    Rating:
    100%
    1   0   0
    The shape of our torque graphs are identical. What doesn't make sense to me is you making peak power at 6800 instead of 7200. Also, they pulled to 8k rpm on mine.
     
  16. stevnoof1

    stevnoof1 Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    mustang
    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2017
    Location:
    NJ
    Posts:
    107
    Likes Received:
    5
    0   0   0
    On 93 a few weeks ago. Blue was 5th gear red 4th.64F87B6B-473D-4365-A3DC-FFCF18CCC887.jpeg
     
  17. LETHAL

    LETHAL From the D but in the NC

    First Name:
    Kevin
    Vehicle(s):
    2018 GT A10
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2015
    Location:
    Asheville, NC
    Posts:
    1,628
    Likes Received:
    531
    Garage Profiles:
    1
    Rating:
    100%
    4   0   0
    Corsa LTH and cats removed today.

    JLT box 93 Lund tune and Corsa CB,

    420/372 Dynojet SAE corrected

    Terrible humid air today but ....

    Kinda pissed..
     
  18. DavidinDurango

    DavidinDurango Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    2018 GT
    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Location:
    Durango, Colorado
    Posts:
    94
    Likes Received:
    33
    0   0   0
    Anyone compared active exhaust modes?????
     
  19. Dragster

    Dragster Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    2015 GT PP
    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2014
    Location:
    USA
    Posts:
    791
    Likes Received:
    153
    0   0   0
    Not sure how to upload the pdf directly from my computer, so I'll just attach the file. My car is a 2015 GT PP with the following power mods: Comp stage 1 cams, GT350 manifold, GT350 throttle body, Roush CAI, Kooks 1 3/4" green catted headers, Borla S-type catback, and remote tuned by Alex at Lund. Car made 436 hp/366 tq SAE corrected on a Dynojet. Car honestly felt stronger and drove better before the manifold, throttle body, and cams...:headbang::facepalm: My "baseline" was on a Mustang dyno (the shop doing the Lund remote tune uses one), and consisted of everything except the manifold, TB, and cams, and the car put down 400 hp/363 tq. The combo of the cams and manifold made the car lose a LOT of power down low, and gained only slightly up top. I'm trying to figure out where I want to go from here as I'm not too pleased with the car in its current form. The thing that sucks is that it's hard to find good info on cams and cam tunes as very few people actually do them. Perhaps this is why... Hard to know who is even good at tuning cammed cars. I went with Lund because I know they've done some in the past, plus they had done my original tune and I already had the Gauge. I previously had stage 3 cams on, and the torque loss was ridiculous. Compared to my baseline run, the car only gained 11 rwhp and lost significant torque all the way to 6,000 RPM. Figured the stage 1 cams would be better for my setup, which they were, but still not what I had hoped for. I created a thread about the results of the cams here, in case anyone is interested in more info:
    https://www.mustang6g.com/forums/th...esults-and-comparison-to-stage-3-cams.108268/
    Any feedback is always appreciated.
     

    Attached Files:

  20. fMErunnin

    fMErunnin Active Member

    Vehicle(s):
    2018 Mustang Gt
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2018
    Location:
    St Louis
    Posts:
    42
    Likes Received:
    38
    Garage Profiles:
    1
    0   0   0
    Added JLT Cold Air (which is sort of a pain to fit) and a bama rev-x tuner with a 91 oct performance tune. Went from 419 to 445. Not bad? :)

    On to the next mod...
     
    Mikepol2 likes this.
Loading...

Share This Page