04lss
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2019
- Threads
- 27
- Messages
- 104
- Reaction score
- 26
- Location
- Richmond Virginia
- First Name
- Matt
- Vehicle(s)
- 2019 Mustang GT 6mt
- Thread starter
- #1
Hi All,
Ive owned my mustang about 3 weeks now. I love it, but she needs more power. Especially low end torque. I currently have a GTI that makes 350 Wheel torque at 2500 RPM and I dont like having to rev the stang out to get it to move.
I have narrowed my search down to the Roush kit, and the Edelbrock kit. It looks like they use a similar SC a 2650. From what ive read Edelbrock has a better cooling solution, and already has a phase 2 out. Roush on the other hand is tight with ford, and I have no concerns about blowing my engine. I also understand roush has a new heat exchanger setup. I should note, i am will do do the phase 2 edelbrock kit if that gets me where i want to be.
I have 2 main questions:
1. ETs. I want a car that does more than 130 in the trap and at least low 11s. Preferably a 10.99. Can either kit do that? I have seen ETs all over the place. I would run full drag slicks (with whatever mods would be needed to do that)
2. Torque curves. Roush seems to show 500 Ftlbs of torque right around 3k. Eddlebrock seems to start making torque much higher in the RPM range Is there really that big of a difference, and if so, would the edelbrock still give me nice rains sub 3500 Rpm. Ideally id like to be able to break my stock tires loose without any shifting being involved. I cant do it now without dumping the clutch.
I apologize if this information is already on here. I have been searching for a while but keep getting conflicting answers.
Ive owned my mustang about 3 weeks now. I love it, but she needs more power. Especially low end torque. I currently have a GTI that makes 350 Wheel torque at 2500 RPM and I dont like having to rev the stang out to get it to move.
I have narrowed my search down to the Roush kit, and the Edelbrock kit. It looks like they use a similar SC a 2650. From what ive read Edelbrock has a better cooling solution, and already has a phase 2 out. Roush on the other hand is tight with ford, and I have no concerns about blowing my engine. I also understand roush has a new heat exchanger setup. I should note, i am will do do the phase 2 edelbrock kit if that gets me where i want to be.
I have 2 main questions:
1. ETs. I want a car that does more than 130 in the trap and at least low 11s. Preferably a 10.99. Can either kit do that? I have seen ETs all over the place. I would run full drag slicks (with whatever mods would be needed to do that)
2. Torque curves. Roush seems to show 500 Ftlbs of torque right around 3k. Eddlebrock seems to start making torque much higher in the RPM range Is there really that big of a difference, and if so, would the edelbrock still give me nice rains sub 3500 Rpm. Ideally id like to be able to break my stock tires loose without any shifting being involved. I cant do it now without dumping the clutch.
I apologize if this information is already on here. I have been searching for a while but keep getting conflicting answers.
Sponsored