Sponsored

19 TSW Bathurt on DIB PP GT

yjack

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Threads
20
Messages
262
Reaction score
52
Location
Alpharetta GA
Vehicle(s)
2015 DIB Premium PP MT GT
19x9 et 30 front 21.2 lbs on oem 255 40 19 P Zero
19.9.5 et 39 rear 20 lbs on oem 275 40 19 P Zero

For some reason the rear wheels are lighter than the front. Checked all 4 wheels and the result are the same for both side.

Update with new pictures.
IMG_20150306_135018.webp
IMG_20150306_135100.webp
IMG_20150306_180444.jpg
IMG_20150306_180532.jpg
IMG_20150307_140542.jpg
IMG_20150307_140522.jpg
IMG_20150307_140347.jpg
IMG_20150307_140505.jpg
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

Todd15Fastback

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Threads
80
Messages
10,523
Reaction score
3,883
Location
Atlanta, GA
First Name
Todd
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP Fastback
Awesome!! You just lost 50lbs over the stock PP wheels.
 

RubyRed15

Ok, so it's blue.
Joined
Nov 30, 2014
Threads
89
Messages
1,769
Reaction score
450
Location
CO
Vehicle(s)
Ecoboost Premium PP
Love the weight; just don't love the color. I also have DIB, so I really appreciate you posting these.
 

Sponsored

luxe_g

Active Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
32
Reaction score
6
Location
San Jose, CA, USA
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT Premium - Guard 50th PP
Looks awesome! I think I like the 19" size better than 20", especially because of how tiny the rear brakes look with 20s.

Out of curiosity, why didn't you just get 19x9.5 on the front, too?

Weird that the wider wheels are lighter and a full 1.5 lbs. lighter than they are listed on TSW's website. Something's not right...
 
OP
OP
yjack

yjack

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Threads
20
Messages
262
Reaction score
52
Location
Alpharetta GA
Vehicle(s)
2015 DIB Premium PP MT GT
Looks awesome! I think I like the 19" size better than 20", especially because of how tiny the rear brakes look with 20s.

Out of curiosity, why didn't you just get 19x9.5 on the front, too?

Weird that the wider wheels are lighter and a full 1.5 lbs. lighter than they are listed on TSW's website. Something's not right...
I pick 19 more because of the performance/comfort reasons. 20 setup probably will be 3-5 lbs more per wheel. And I think 40 series tire looks the best.

19x9.5 probably will not clear the front brake due to its 39 offset. I don't want to gamble it so I played safe.

Actually on tire rack a lot of the front wheels are lighter than the rear. I think it probably has something to do with the offset? Plus rear has deeper concave than the front, so its not exactly an identical design.
 
OP
OP
yjack

yjack

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Threads
20
Messages
262
Reaction score
52
Location
Alpharetta GA
Vehicle(s)
2015 DIB Premium PP MT GT
update with some better pictures..
 

kn7671

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Threads
9
Messages
300
Reaction score
114
Location
Arlington, TX
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP
The extra weight on the fronts is from the mounting pad on the rear of the wheels. You can tell this is the reason just by looking at the depth of the lug nuts. The rear appear shallow and protrude from the rear wheel, while the front lug nuts are completely buried in the lug hole.

I was looking at some Vossen wheels but decided against them for the very same reason, rear lug nuts protrude out from the wheel, ruining the look.
 
Last edited:

Sponsored

Todd15Fastback

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Threads
80
Messages
10,523
Reaction score
3,883
Location
Atlanta, GA
First Name
Todd
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP Fastback
I pick 19 more because of the performance/comfort reasons. 20 setup probably will be 3-5 lbs more per wheel. And I think 40 series tire looks the best.

19x9.5 probably will not clear the front brake due to its 39 offset. I don't want to gamble it so I played safe.

Actually on tire rack a lot of the front wheels are lighter than the rear. I think it probably has something to do with the offset? Plus rear has deeper concave than the front, so its not exactly an identical design.
20x10's are 22lbs for reference.
 

Todd15Fastback

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Threads
80
Messages
10,523
Reaction score
3,883
Location
Atlanta, GA
First Name
Todd
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP Fastback
Tsw's website says 24.45 for the 20x10?
Correct. Their published weights seem to be off by 1.5lbs or more. Someone posted a scale weight of under 23lbs if I recall on the 20x10's.
 

Travbedaman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2013
Threads
8
Messages
200
Reaction score
35
Location
Tampa, FL
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT DIB Prem
Correct. Their published weights seem to be off by 1.5lbs or more. Someone posted a scale weight of under 23lbs if I recall on the 20x10's.
Wow. For once a manufacturer makes a mistake in our favor? Sweet!
 

FusionGT

Large member
Joined
Dec 4, 2014
Threads
12
Messages
296
Reaction score
51
Location
South Jersey
Vehicle(s)
'15 Mustang GT PP / Jeep TJ
Those look awesome. The rotational mass weight savings is humongous compared to the stock wheels. Especially the pp wheels. Might just have to pick up a set. Thanks for sharing.
Sponsored

 
 








Top