v8440
Well-Known Member
If he says he's going to do something, you can be fairly sure he'll do it. He's not known for screwing up much, or for not making power. Ain't no backyard operation there.
Sponsored
The big question is what are the lab conditions and would they work/fit in a vehicle? Is he force cooling the water and oil temp below what could be achieved in a vehicle, cooling the intercooler outlet charge air more than could ever be done in a vehicle (except for iced intercooler on 1/4 mile pass), running very little backpressure on a lab straight pipe that wouldn't fit in a car, running a horn style inlet with no air cleaner restriction, that kind of thing.
If you ever watch that Engine Masters show on Youtube, they do that stuff all the time. Pause the shot video in strategic places and read the temperature measurements, look at the test cell setup, that kind of thing. It's more of a dyno queen entertainment thing than actually making something for a vehicle.
Thankfully he's less than an hour from me lol :ford:It will have unobtanium parts that we will never see. He knows what it will take and knows the shops and guys that play at his level.
Not to mention actual useable power band. 1100 hp needs at least 110lb/min capable turbo to accomplish this and a turbo of this size on a 2.3L engine is going to be lag city like full spool at 6000 RPMs laggy.He's got a long road ahead of him, not saying he won't. I'm saying he's going to run into all the same problems everyone else is having, fuel, head flow, cams, intake manifold, head gasket. There's a reason 680 whp is the record right now.
It would be laggier than that off the bottle. We are looking at 4500rpm spool for 24psi on a 6466 on these engines, again off the bottle.Not to mention actual useable power band. 1100 hp needs at least 110lb/min capable turbo to accomplish this and a turbo of this size on a 2.3L engine is going to be lag city like full spool at 6000 RPMs laggy.
I agree especially to help it spool the monster turbo it will have.I'm thinking a good bit of nitrous will be in the works here
True especially if on C-16 Q-16 or E-100 around 95-100lbs/min should suffice.It would be laggier than that off the bottle. We are looking at 4500rpm spool for 24psi on a 6466 on these engines, again off the bottle.
For 1100hp you would be looking at 95lb/min minimum (remember 1100CHP not WHP) so we are talking a 9567 from Xona. That turbo spools at 4.3k on a 3.8L.. just imagine a 2.65L lol.
750-785 ish crank I think if my math is correct (averaging if MT or AT)680 whp, is alot a damned good bit! ... what do you figure that is at the crank?
VS doesn't work as you'd hope, especially on the small stock turbo, or even a big turbo for that matter. I think Adam's testing shows that an organized air column is more beneficial on this car, as well as better air charge temps. I did some testing as well and an open compressor and v-stack netted no benefit on the track. As a matter of fact, the car drives better in all accounts with the stock airbox, lol.I'll be running a velocity stack on my car for the glory runs... Blox makes a great filter that with about 10 seconds of work switches to a velocity stack. Picked this trick up from my high HP Honda friends a while back.
From my testing not a huge difference in powertrain loss between MT and AT.750-785 ish crank I think if my math is correct (averaging if MT or AT)