Sponsored

Edmunds Review (GT & EcoBoost)

Fenderaddict2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Threads
27
Messages
844
Reaction score
4
Location
Oakville
Website
www.fastmyles.com
First Name
Stephen
Vehicle(s)
2012 Mustang Boss 302
http://www.edmunds.com/ford/mustang/2015/road-test.html

Quick Summary
One of America's favorite four-passenger, rear wheel-drive coupes, the Ford Mustang is completely overhauled for 2015. The formula hasn't changed, but the details have. It's more capable, comfortable and better-equipped than ever.

What Is It?
This midsize coupe shares its wheelbase with the outgoing Mustang, sits a bit lower and wider and has a broader track width. However, it's essentially a clean-sheet redesign for 2015. The new car also marks another milestone for the Mustang, as it's the first time an independent suspension has been fitted to the base model, relegating its previous, less sophisticated straight axle design to the scrap heap of history. That might not sound like a big deal since, well, every other rear-wheel-drive car on the road did the same years ago, but in Mustang-land, it's significant.

The multilink rear end underpins the new chassis and is joined by a revised MacPherson strut front suspension and an expanded powertrain lineup. Another side benefit of the independent rear suspension is that it allows the chassis to be inherently stiffer. Elsewhere, the new car's interior has been thoroughly updated while retaining traditional Mustang cues.




What Does the Powertrain Lineup Consist of?
Entry-level Mustangs are equipped with a 3.7-liter V6, and GT models have a 5.0-liter V8. For the first time in decades, a four-cylinder option is available, a 2.3-liter turbocharged unit. You will be able to pair all three engines with either a six-speed manual transmission or a six-speed automatic. More details on the engines can be found in our 2015 Mustang First Look.

The V6 now generates 300 horsepower and 280 pound-feet of torque, figures that are actually 5 hp and 10 lb-ft of torque lower than last year's model. The power drop is said to be attributed to packaging the intake manifold under the new car's lower hood. That the V6's slight reduction in output creates some marketing airspace for the new EcoBoost turbocharged four-cylinder engine that sits above the V6 in the pecking order is, well, serendipitous.

Generating 310 hp and 320 lb-ft of torque on 93 octane premium fuel, the EcoBoost four outshines the V6 slightly (it will run just fine on 87 octane, though peak output drops to 270 hp due to the knock propensity of the crummier fuel). Note that the EcoBoost four generates its maximum torque over a wider portion of the rev range than does the relatively peakier V6.

The other upside to the EcoBoost is fuel economy. It is expected to return 25 mpg combined (21 city/32 highway) with the six-speed automatic and 26 mpg combined (22 city/31 highway) with the six-speed manual. These results eclipse the V6's combined mpg by 3 mpg for the automatic and 5 mpg for the manual.

Topping the range (for now) is the GT's revised 5.0-liter V8, now generating 435 hp and 400 lb-ft of torque. It is expected to deliver 19 mpg combined (16 city/25 highway) with the automatic. Manual-equipped GTs are rated at 1 mpg lower in the city.




What Body Styles and Trim Levels Are Available?
For now, all Mustangs are coupes, or "fastbacks" in Ford-speak. As always, it's rear-wheel drive, has a conventional trunk, two doors and a backseat. In other words, it's a Mustang.
Base models are equipped with the V6, and GT models get the V8. V6 models are the least expensive starting at $24,425, while the base price of the GT is $32,925. EcoBoost variants start at $25,995.
A Premium package is available for GT and EcoBoost models that adds a variety of features and brings the price up another $4,000.

Enthusiasts will gravitate toward the Performance package available for EcoBoost and GT models. This consists of stiffer springs, monotube dampers, a larger rear stabilizer bar, additional chassis braces, a shorter final-drive ratio, bigger brakes and summer tires. It'll run you $1,995 for EcoBoost variants and $2,495 for GT models.

A convertible version of the new Mustang will be available before the end of this year, probably in December.

How Does It Feel on the Road?
We spent some time driving a 2015 Ford Mustang GT equipped with the manual gearbox, base suspension and 255/40 all-season tires on the optional 19-inch wheels. Right away, things are looking up. The shifter moves through its gates positively, with short, slick throws, and the pedals are laid out well for heel-toe downshifting.

As for power, it's got that, too. The "Coyote" V8 is still a beaut, pulling all the way to the rev limiter with enthusiasm and that familiar V8 soundtrack. It makes more power this year, but not enough more to notice in street driving.

"Refined" is the word that keeps coming to mind. On a freeway cruise the new Mustang is tight, quiet and feels like it's traveling 20 mph slower than it really is, so watch that speedometer.

All those live axle histrionics of the old car are a memory. Excessive nosedive and squat, traditional Mustang characteristics have been largely eradicated in the new Mustang, so in this respect the new car feels less ponderous. It picks its feet up well over bumps, lending it a ride refinement the old car could never match. The steering is well-weighted, quicker than you expect and very precise, though there could be more feel. Despite being heavier than last year's Mustang (the 2015 Mustang GT's base curb weight is 3,705 pounds), the new car has more composure and feels lighter on its feet.





Does It Have Any Weaknesses?
It's all roses and thumbs-up for this Mustang until you throw it into a series of corners, where it's kind of a mixed bag. Working it hard on a canyon road reveals a base suspension that is too floaty and soft, and as a result the chassis never quite feels settled, even as the tires feel sure-footed. But you need to press through this vagueness. If you do you'll find there's a surprising amount of grip available, and a chassis that's immune to midcorner bumps, so at least all that compliance has an upside.

So, if you ever plan on taking the new Mustang through a corner in anger, skip right to the Performance Pack. We sampled an EcoBoost Mustang thusly equipped, and the handling improvement is immediately obvious even before you explore the outer limits of grip. The floatiness is turned way down and the chassis is far more eager to change direction, though at least some of this latter characteristic is down to the EcoBoost's 100-pound lighter front end. This is still a big car, but in this guise it seems to shrink significantly.

The EcoBoost's power delivery is strong from low revs, and Ford engineers weren't shy about piping intake honk into the cabin. It's unabashedly a four-cylinder sound, and this will appeal to some people as much as it turns others off. The raucousness grows a bit tiresome if you hammer the EcoBoost near the rev limiter for a while, but around town the engine is muted, pleasant and mannerly. Despite the EcoBoost's solid torque, the grunt doesn't hit all at once when you pick up the throttle exiting a corner. In this respect, the four-cylinder Mustang is less of a hooligan than it could be.

Thus, the sweet spot among all the permutations of the 2015 Ford Mustang appears to be, perhaps unsurprisingly, the GT equipped with the Performance Pack.

What Is the Interior Like?
Even peering at it through the window, it's obvious that the 2015 Mustang's cabin is significantly improved. Things get even better once you're seated inside, as there's a more spacious feel thanks to the new car's less-monolithic dashboard and smaller center console. Its materials have a more premium look, and feel better than ever before. Our tester was not equipped with a sunroof, and headroom was adequate for this 6-foot-plus driver.

The steering wheel's contoured grips and tidier size means it's far nicer to use than the old-school wheel in the outgoing Mustang. There's a soft elbow pad on the console, too. The gauges are actually legible now, and they don't reflect on the inside of the windshield like the old ones.

Visibility is reasonably good, certainly better than a Camaro or Challenger, though the thick C-pillars block everything over your shoulders. The cabin temperature controls are fiddly momentary rockers with tiny protrusions, so there's an incentive to simply use the auto climate control function. Finally, that row of rockers beneath the climate controls sure looks cool.

What Are Its Closest Competitors?
The Ford Mustang GT faces off squarely against two rivals in a pony car battle royale, both of which originate from America.

Chevrolet Camaro SS: Mustang versus Camaro is the stuff of the ages. Equipped with a 426-hp 6.2-liter pushrod V8, the Camaro is vocal and rapid. It's more difficult to live with on a daily basis, however, due to its small trunk opening and pillbox styling that hampers outward visibility.

Down the street, the Dodge Challenger R/T offers a more cruiser-like riff on the idea of these big American coupes. With the 5.7-liter pushrod V8 that generates 375 hp, it's a bit outgunned but not out of the hunt.

Why Should You Consider This Car?
If the idea of a Mustang has held appeal previously but you just couldn't get past its dated interior or bobbling rear axle, this car is for you. The new car has moved the Mustang into the modern age, adding heaps of refinement at every turn without abandoning its core appeal.


Why Should You Think Twice About This Car?
Despite its across-the-board improvements, the Mustang is still a large, heavy car. Physics can't change that it's a different sort of car from, for example, a Scion FR-S or Mazda Miata.

Sponsored

 

Wildcat

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2013
Threads
18
Messages
655
Reaction score
20
Location
Tampa, FL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Focus
Another review that mentions a "mixed bag" in the handling department.

Looks like Performance Pack is a must on either variant, which makes me even more po'ed that you can't get a GT auto with the PP.
 

steelertown

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Threads
5
Messages
70
Reaction score
3
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
Car
Thanks for the link, edmunds was the review I have been waiting for. I think this one feels totally unbiased. I have a hard time trusting reviews that can't mention one negative thing about a car and this review does a great job giving compliments and critiques.

only thing I am still hoping someone touches on are the paddle shifters in the auto.

*edit*

Another review that mentions a "mixed bag" in the handling department.

Looks like Performance Pack is a must on either variant, which makes me even more po'ed that you can't get a GT auto with the PP.

Same, I really wish they offered it as well. Not a fan of what they did with their packages on this car. There is quite a bit of forcing you into options and packages to get what you really want. It is making me consider the m/t though now.
 

Trackaholic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2013
Threads
7
Messages
3,035
Reaction score
1,474
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
2003 350Z, 2016 GT350, 2018 Pacifica Hybrid
Another review that mentions a "mixed bag" in the handling department.

Looks like Performance Pack is a must on either variant, which makes me even more po'ed that you can't get a GT auto with the PP.
It seems like the car is just under-damped. I wonder what some good shocks would do to that criticism, even without the rest of the PP upgrades?

Everything else seems really good, so it'd be nice if all you needed was some Koni's or something like that.

-T
 

akwal07

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2014
Threads
2
Messages
196
Reaction score
0
Location
california
Vehicle(s)
2011 mustang kona blue v6
I don't understand handling complaints... The current car drives great regularly and I took my car up the highway 17. 3 times a week for two years (very windy 2 lane freeway bumpy too) here in cali going 80 in 45 when I felt like letting lose. No one is taking their car to the tract maybe to do 1/4 mile tests but that's mostly it. This car is improved on my cars handling (which is pretty good in my opinion). I'm not even excited about this car right now, but don't compare it to an frs that still loses on canyon roads to the current v6.
 

Sponsored

Whiskey11

Kill ALL the Cones!
Joined
Oct 19, 2013
Threads
2
Messages
523
Reaction score
102
Location
US of A
Vehicle(s)
2016 Ruby Red Base GT/PP
It seems like the car is just under-damped. I wonder what some good shocks would do to that criticism, even without the rest of the PP upgrades?

Everything else seems really good, so it'd be nice if all you needed was some Koni's or something like that.

-T
That'll help with some of the transient behaviors but I wonder about overall balance and how much of that can be tweaked within the car's factory settings. It would be way too nice for Ford to offer a set of camber bolts from the factory in the front lower control arm lateral link...
 

Brent302

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 13, 2014
Threads
18
Messages
3,528
Reaction score
399
Location
Springfield VA
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT/PP
It seems like the car is just under-damped. I wonder what some good shocks would do to that criticism, even without the rest of the PP upgrades?

Everything else seems really good, so it'd be nice if all you needed was some Koni's or something like that.

-T
Another review that mentions a "mixed bag" in the handling department.

Looks like Performance Pack is a must on either variant, which makes me even more po'ed that you can't get a GT auto with the PP.
I don't understand handling complaints... The current car drives great regularly and I took my car up the highway 17. 3 times a week for two years (very windy 2 lane freeway bumpy too) here in cali going 80 in 45 when I felt like letting lose. No one is taking their car to the tract maybe to do 1/4 mile tests but that's mostly it. This car is improved on my cars handling (which is pretty good in my opinion). I'm not even excited about this car right now, but don't compare it to an frs that still loses on canyon roads to the current v6.
That'll help with some of the transient behaviors but I wonder about overall balance and how much of that can be tweaked within the car's factory settings. It would be way too nice for Ford to offer a set of camber bolts from the factory in the front lower control arm lateral link...
Just to Note he said the Base Suspension but step up to the PP and it gets rid of any sloppiness.

I truly think 275s in front will end any more complaints.
 

oyitsagreen

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2014
Threads
4
Messages
525
Reaction score
5
Location
Charlotte
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP
The car feels like it's going 20 mph slower then it already is... hate that.
Hopefully the FRPP Exhaust/Lowering Springs will fix that!

Edit Nevermind forgot he didn't have the PP.
 

Millgeo5

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 27, 2014
Threads
12
Messages
533
Reaction score
42
Location
Tucson
First Name
Geoff
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT
Another review that mentions a "mixed bag" in the handling department.

Looks like Performance Pack is a must on either variant, which makes me even more po'ed that you can't get a GT auto with the PP.

From the start I wanted the PP but after 2 knee surgeries I had to get the AT.
 

blackfire12

Active Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2014
Threads
1
Messages
41
Reaction score
1
Location
Austin
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT Premium + PP, DIB
Thanks for the link, edmunds was the review I have been waiting for. I think this one feels totally unbiased. I have a hard time trusting reviews that can't mention one negative thing about a car and this review does a great job giving compliments and critiques.

only thing I am still hoping someone touches on are the paddle shifters in the auto.
I agree, this seems to be a way milder "for the people" type of review which I can appreciate. Sure, the specifics are important and the review touches on those but for those of us who aren't diehards or haven't witnessed the Mustang legacy, the review paints a better overall picture which is highly positive! Coming from a Focus S and a Mazda 6i before that... this will be a huge step up.
 

Sponsored

Spartan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Threads
94
Messages
3,883
Reaction score
569
Location
MD
Vehicle(s)
Ford Explorer Sport
Another review that mentions a "mixed bag" in the handling department.

Looks like Performance Pack is a must on either variant, which makes me even more po'ed that you can't get a GT auto with the PP.
I wonder though if setting it to SPORT mode would solve all this.
 

Old 5 Oh

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2014
Threads
24
Messages
2,422
Reaction score
329
Location
Wilder, ID
First Name
David
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT Premium AT
The AT won out for me. I am anxious to drive it. If it's too "floaty," there's always the aftermarket. A Saturday morning spent swapping shocks, struts, maybe springs, and sway bars will correct any deficiencies I can't live with.
 
 








Top