Sponsored

Mishimoto’s EcoBoost Intercooler Development! Pre-Sale Info Page 4!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mishimoto

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2014
Threads
61
Messages
1,047
Reaction score
413
Location
Delaware
Vehicle(s)
2015 EcoBoost, 2016 GT
UPDATE:

Project Update! Check it out below.

The Mustang EcoBoost Intercooler, Part 4: Final Prototype Design

Prototype Modeling
Now that we had a core that was functioning to our standards, it was time to finalize our end tank design and make 3D models to reflect our plans. After some lengthy modeling work, we came up with the renders you see below!
16baclj.png

Mishimoto prototype intercooler 3D model
nlwj0w.png

Mishimoto prototype intercooler 3D model

Mishimoto prototype intercooler 3D model

A few quick notes about this cooler! We designed this unit to fit within the same space as the stock intercooler. We designed cast-aluminum end tanks, which will be mated to the bar-and-plate core we tested during the previous (Part 3) segment of this series. We are also retaining the stock intercooler connections, which are large enough for sufficient flow to produce rather high power.

For this cooler we were concerned with pushing air to the entire thickness of the cooler. During the design of this cooler we experimented with internal end tank diverters. We’ve used these diverters on a few of our taller coolers to help promote airflow to the full length of the intercooler. By doing so we can take full advantage of the large core.
First, check out the dispersion of air without any internal diverter, as demonstrated by computational fluis dynamics (CFD).


CFD of air dispersion in Mishimoto prototype intercooler without a diverter

And the shot below shows the dispersion with a diverter installed.

2u8l2yt.webp

CFD of air dispersion in Mishimoto prototype intercooler with a diverter
As you can see, the diverter placement is making a fairly significant impact on the air dispersion to the rear of the cooler. We decided this was the route to go, and we will be including this feature on our next prototype. It will be very interesting to see the impact of this change on the outlet temperatures.

Here is a look at a 3D model cutaway showing the diverter.


Internal air diverter 3D model


Internal air diverter 3D model

3D-Printed Prototype
To verify fitment, we 3D-printed our end tanks to obtain the exact dimensions of our design so we could fit this to the vehicle and ensure that we were spot-on.

First, the tanks were printed.


3D-printing of prototype end tank

And the result!


3D-printed prototype of end tanks


3D-printed prototype of end tanks

2wd27oy.webp

3D-printed prototype of end tanks


3D-printed prototype of end tank

Once printed, we attached these to a prototype core and mocked up the unit into place to confirm all our dimensions and mounting points.

Check back next time for a look at our fully functioning final prototype!

Thanks
-John


Hey guys,

As noted on several other threads here on Mustang6g, we are hard at work to develop an awesome intercooler. Follow the progress of development on our blog, or posted in this thread!

http://engineering.mishimoto.com/category/ford-mustang-2-3l-ecoboost-intercooler-2015/

The Mustang EcoBoost Intercooler, Part 1: Stock Cooler

With nearly a 30-year gap between the old and new turbocharged 4-cylinder Mustang, some things are bound to change. The new Mustang features many interesting advances in technology, including direct injection, a twin-scroll turbocharger, a DOHC cylinder head with variable valve timing, and a newly designed intercooler. The 80’s model featured a top-mount intercooler that was fed cool air through a functional hood scoop. This was pretty slick stuff for the days when the Walkman revolutionized how we listen to music, and “the Clapper” paved the way for a new level of laziness.

The new Mustang features a very efficient front-mounted intercooler that fits right below the radiator. A fresh stream of airflow passes through the tube-and-fin core and works to combat high intake temperatures.
We’ve been highlighting our progress on the development of a variety of new components for the 15’ Mustang, and it’s finally time to get caught up on our intercooler design! Follow our progress below.

Stock Intercooler Design
Before jumping into the new cooler design, let’s took a look at the stock intercooler and its location. This would give us a good idea of where improvements can be made.

Here are a few shots of the stock cooler in its proper position.


Stock intercooler installed

16219hy.webp

Stock intercooler installed

34ql1c0.webp

Stock intercooler installed

Next, we stripped the stock setup from our test vehicle!

ebd72s.webp

Stock intercooler removed

Once removed, we took a closer look at what Ford provided with the EcoBoost Mustang.


Stock intercooler

2q8zr4g.webp

Stock intercooler

vgt0ub.webp

Stock intercooler

1zo98iw.webp

Stock intercooler

The exterior fins are reasonably dense on this stock cooler. We then took a peek at the internal fins.

o06i2v.webp

Stock intercooler internal fins

We planned to pull this unit apart for further inspection, but first we grabbed a few of the dimensions using our Romer arm. This would help us plan a few of the mounting points and general constraints once we get to the point of designing our cooler.

2hmqb02.webp

Obtaining stock intercooler dimensions via coordinate measuring machine

Stock Intercooler Internals
Now that the measuring was complete, off with the end tanks! These are removed easily by bending the crimped edges. The plastic tanks seal to the core with a rubber gasket.

11wc22s.webp

Stock intercooler end tank removed

2uqg006.webp

Stock intercooler end tank internal surface

We were then left with a bare core!

vnza8k.jpg

Stock intercooler core

244sirk.webp

Stock intercooler core

We then snagged basic core dimensions!

16c29g3.webp

Stock intercooler core dimensions

Let’s quickly recap our findings on the stock cooler and outline our plans for the Mishimoto unit.

Stock Intercooler

  • Measures 20.5” x 5.75” x 3.2” for a total core volume of approximately 380 cubic inches
  • Tube-and-fin core design
  • Plastic end tanks crimped to the intercooler core
  • Clamped hose connections on both inlet and outlet
  • Fits in place under the radiator
  • Features tank-mounted Manifold Absolute Pressure (MAP) sensor
Mishimoto Intercooler Plans

  • Increase volume substantially with a 4+” thick core
  • Cast aluminum end tanks for increased durability and smooth flow
  • Bar-and-plate intercooler core
  • Direct fit including all piping connections
  • Fit in the stock location without blocking airflow to radiator
  • Retain the factory active grille-shutter system
  • Improve horsepower and lower the intake temperatures
We have some pretty big plans for this intercooler! Be sure to check back for a look at our first prototype unit.

As we proceed with development, is there anything specifically that you’d like to see highlighted in these posts?

Thanks
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

JeffreyDJ

Jedi
Joined
Dec 2, 2014
Threads
23
Messages
1,190
Reaction score
268
Location
Dallas
First Name
JJ
Vehicle(s)
'17 Mustang GT
  • Direct fit including all piping connections
  • Fit in the stock location without blocking airflow to radiator
  • Retain the factory active grille-shutter system
I really appreciate this in your designs so far. I'll be watching for more details.
 

ECOKN815

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Threads
0
Messages
105
Reaction score
11
Location
New York
Vehicle(s)
1985 Mustang LX Hatch T-Tops
Thumbs up. As long as the design and function can be installed with out modifying OEM parts is always a +
 
OP
OP
Mishimoto

Mishimoto

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2014
Threads
61
Messages
1,047
Reaction score
413
Location
Delaware
Vehicle(s)
2015 EcoBoost, 2016 GT
Thumbs up. As long as the design and function can be installed with out modifying OEM parts is always a +
Thanks! That is certainly the plan. The EB offers a ton of space to enlarge the cooler without hacking/trimming the front end components. :cheers:
 

Sponsored

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
14,989
Reaction score
8,907
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
Looking good! I like that it will be a direct bolt-on and will not prevent use of stock components (grille shutters).
 

JeffreyDJ

Jedi
Joined
Dec 2, 2014
Threads
23
Messages
1,190
Reaction score
268
Location
Dallas
First Name
JJ
Vehicle(s)
'17 Mustang GT
I'm glad I'm not the only one that prefers not modifying/hindering OEM fitments! :)
 

leszek

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Threads
11
Messages
456
Reaction score
148
Location
Kirkland, WA
Vehicle(s)
S550 CO GT PP vert
Having an installation that does not require front bumper removal would be a plus.
 

Sponsored
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Threads
0
Messages
16
Reaction score
2
Location
California
Website
www.mustangecoboost.com
First Name
Joe
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang Ecoboost
Subscribed. Can't wait to see hard data on OEM vs Mishimoto pressure drops, temperature differences, HP, etc.

Had a conversation regarding intercoolers with a colleague a few months back- as with everything automotive the supplier margins are extremely tight. It'll be nice to see what can be done when cost isn't the #1 factor.
 

YellowBee

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Threads
12
Messages
235
Reaction score
21
Location
Quad Cities, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ford Eco-boost Mustang
Hope you can bolt it to the stock place
 

RubyRacer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2014
Threads
15
Messages
447
Reaction score
163
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
22 Mustang GT 6M
I am also glad you're trying to retain stock parts while enhancing the intercooler.
 
OP
OP
Mishimoto

Mishimoto

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2014
Threads
61
Messages
1,047
Reaction score
413
Location
Delaware
Vehicle(s)
2015 EcoBoost, 2016 GT
I'm glad I'm not the only one that prefers not modifying/hindering OEM fitments! :)
I am also glad you're trying to retain stock parts while enhancing the intercooler.
Thanks for the feedback guys!

Really good breakdown of the stock IC, thanks!
Absolutely! Thanks for taking a look. :thumbsup:

Having an installation that does not require front bumper removal would be a plus.
Very true! Our goal is to make install as easy as possible. So far, it appears as though the bumper will need to be removed. If we are able to devise a process that avoids bumper removal, we will let you know.

Subscribed. Can't wait to see hard data on OEM vs Mishimoto pressure drops, temperature differences, HP, etc.

Had a conversation regarding intercoolers with a colleague a few months back- as with everything automotive the supplier margins are extremely tight. It'll be nice to see what can be done when cost isn't the #1 factor.
Thanks! We will have our first round of testing data up in 1-2 weeks. Our charts will include physical differences, pressure data, temperature data, and power output information.

Hope you can bolt it to the stock place
Our cooler will utilize the factory mounting points!
 

neodark

Left 4cyl @home
Joined
Sep 3, 2014
Threads
44
Messages
1,505
Reaction score
237
Location
FL
First Name
Jorge
Vehicle(s)
2019 GT PP2
Looking forward to the next piece, another great writeup!
Sponsored

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
 








Top