You do realize it was for the naming rights only right? Shelby American had no input in the S550 Shelby’s. That was all Ford Performance (now Ford Racing). The engineers are not the problem at Ford…Ford (and their cheap-ass bean counters) wanted to save $800 a car by not paying Shelby American to have their name on it. Really DUMB STUPID move! Shelby American should be the one telling Ford how to engineer the cars for PERFORMANCE.
You going to take them up on the invite to drive one, Tob?I got the invite this morning. Watkins Glen.
I loved my GT350. I love my GT500. And I'm glad to see the DH SC come along. The S650 is a well developed platform and Ford engineers have improved just about everything that the S550 GT500 had. The Predator engine has been well supported by the aftermarket community so there's no waiting for parts to be developed if you want to dive into power mods right away.
If I was in the market for one I'd absolutely be negotiating on a version that would suit my needs.
Yes, I understand that. But i"m in the sales and marketing business and Ford's bean counters threw away one of the best marketing tools they had to sell high-performance Mustangs just to that they could save $800 a car and have their own "brand," Dark Horse. Some of the engineering that Ford's done on the Dark Horse (and even the GT's) leaves a lot to be desired. And when in the hell are we EVER going to see a 2.7 or 3.0L TT V6 in a Mustang? Likely never because the brainiacs at Ford think that will bastardize too many V-8 sales away to Ecoboost motors. I own a 2016 EB and at high RPM, that is a COARSE engine, rather than the TT V6 motors which are a lot smoother with more power at a lower RPM range. I also own a M-B GLC43 SUV which has a 3.2L DI/TT motor in it tha puts out 370 HP and it is a WAY better engine and smooth like butter.You do realize it was for the naming rights only right? Shelby American had no input in the S550 Shelby’s. That was all Ford Performance (now Ford Racing). The engineers are not the problem at Ford…