RNM
Well-Known Member
Safety and peace of mind.You are safe at 900 to 930 on 93. You need a fuel system to run 85. So if you are happy in the 900s then why spend that extra money?
Sponsored
Safety and peace of mind.You are safe at 900 to 930 on 93. You need a fuel system to run 85. So if you are happy in the 900s then why spend that extra money?
Not true. I️ have Had bad gas on a few occasions and it just dropped HP. I️ now Know what gas stations to avoid. It really is safe. I️ get An average of maybe 200 miles to a tank of gas. If I️ switch to 85 it would drop to 130-150 miles to a tank. It is also not readily available. The 5.2 on 93 is very safe at 900 hp but that is as far as you can go safely.You're one tank of bad gas away from a bad time
The 5.2 is safe without a fuel system on 93 around 900 hp. You already have a dual pump setup that can handle it.Safety and peace of mind.
The "teal package" is an option, I believe. Don't quote me on that. And I do like it! On a black car, it would look killer. I like it on the blue car that Ford showed. Growing up in the 80's and 90's there were a lot of fluorescent and bright colors. I love/miss those times. (Think old school 80's BMX/Freestyle bikes.)Likes: Drivetrain, body lines, wing/ducktail and taillights, carbon ceramic brakes, new car smell
Dislikes: Front end, the teal colors, the paint style on the hood on the special editions, hood vent style,
Undecided: Dash, Exhaust tips.
It's all about the price point from here out. Under $125k for the top shelf car and it's a winner. $150k msrp, and I'm not having it.
Subaru vibes:
![]()
For me the logical comparison is to the Mustang GTs that were offered for sale a few years ago by the dealership in Ohio. They dropped a Rousch supercharger onto them and charged $42K, IIRC. Those cars have what I would feel I need from a supercharged Mustang. The DH probably will have more equipment, but none of it makes the car more desirable to me.So, how many of you guys like this DarkHorse SC car?
I like it. I think it looks aggressive and I love the front end of the car. I didn't want to rush to judgement right away when it was unveiled, but I actually kind of liked it from the start. Not too crazy about the ducktail spoiler with the high wing spoiler, but it's supposedly 10% more efficient that way, as far as downforce goes.
So, how many of you guys like this DarkHorse SC car?
I’d like that theoretical car with a manual as well, though it would likely have a different name because there’s already a Dark Horse R and a Dark Horse S (though I believe they’re track only or race only cars).After Ford's losses in their EV investments we are lucky to have a car like this. Even if it is just a reskinned GT500 with some upgrades. I personally like it. The next Ford Racing model I would like to see is a Dark Horse on the same chassis as the DHSC but with an NA 5.2 crossplane engine with a DCT or manual and call it DHR.
Farley gave a bad answer there. I love the GTD but it is not a corvette competitor unless I can go buy one at Corvette pricesSince the Corvette competitor thread got closed…
That’s what many of us wanted this car to be. NA 5.2 or 7.3 with a manualAfter Ford's losses in their EV investments we are lucky to have a car like this. Even if it is just a reskinned GT500 with some upgrades. I personally like it. The next Ford Racing model I would like to see is a Dark Horse on the same chassis as the DHSC but with an NA 5.2 crossplane engine with a DCT or manual and call it DHR.
Yeah they’ve painted themselves into a corner with the names. Let’s try to help them out. Dark Horse X? Dark Horse Z?I’d like that theoretical car with a manual as well, though it would likely have a different name because there’s already a Dark Horse R and a Dark Horse S (though I believe they’re track only or race only cars).
After Ford's losses in their EV investments we are lucky to have a car like this. Even if it is just a reskinned GT500 with some upgrades. I personally like it. The next Ford Racing model I would like to see is a Dark Horse on the same chassis as the DHSC but with an NA 5.2 crossplane engine with a DCT or manual and call it DHR.
The engine in the IMSA Mustang GT3 car is wicked. It's a coyote 5.0 bored out to 5.4. This would be a nice street car in either manual or DCT. I would prefer a manual. I personally would love Ford to offer this engine in a production car but they would need to move production of the engine in house though.I’d like that theoretical car with a manual as well, though it would likely have a different name because there’s already a Dark Horse R and a Dark Horse S (though I believe they’re track only or race only cars).