Mine has been mixed. Some times I'm getting 24-27mpg and currently 19-21mpg. I know using the remote start on the cold mornings isn't helping my mpg, but keeps me warm. I'm almost at 900 miles and I can't keep my foot off the gas pedal either.
The PP adds more weight then the normal EB so that's one thing. What mode are you driving it in? If you are in Sport+ then that isnt going to yield as good of mileage either. Also, are you in boost a lot? Turbo motors burn fuel badly while in boost.
Same boat here, mine was drinking gas like its about to go extinct; during my MANY gas stops, I talked to RAM and SUV drivers who get better mileage. First tank of soft driving, 280 miles, first tank of premium was worse, at 250. Road trips at steady 69, not getting into boost at all, was a hand calculated 29 mpg, which to me sucks. So far it is doing slightly better after a tune, I'll report total miles when tank runs dry.
Twenty nine sucks, when in bold letters on the sticker it says the number 32. And it does when you come from a much more powerful car, one that doesnt sound like blender, that easily beats that number AND its EPA rating.
And IMO, when you have had no less than 6 cars, that had lower EPA ratings than the ecobust, beat their EPA ratings even when driven aggressively it becomes far less far-fetched. And its not far-fetched at all to expect the ecobust to at least MATCH its EPA ratings, especially when driven gently, which I almost always do to avoid hearing that dreadful sounding engine.
Obie, you don't happen to be medically defined as morbidly obese are you? Disease of the body and car performance...
3 mpg under EPA is not guzzling gas...Do realize these are estimates so going to the dealer and arguing "estimated" information is laughable...Why dealerships are shrugging you off because there are SO MANY factors to mpg.
Yep and that doesn't even mention what you have in your car.