Lol. May as well just say "10 out of 10 2015-2017 owners said they think the 15-17 looks better. Experts agree!"Not at all. I think out of 10 people I asked 10 said 15-17 looks much more like a classic mustang should be And nicer then 18 and up.
Let this speak for itself...
I also love when people try using the initial leaked photo to compare... it was such an unflattering angle that Ford never even ended up using it for any promotional content. But it's almost like they're admitting that they've only been looking at that picture for the past 2 years and have been blocking their eyes to any other pictures because they're afraid they'll like it too much and regret not buying one LMAO
Whoever in Ford signed off on this marketing material for the 18, with its drowsy look and washed out yellow should be firedNot at all. I think out of 10 people I asked 10 said 15-17 looks much more like a classic mustang should be And nicer then 18 and up.
Let this speak for itself...
Recently we saw the first spyshots of a second S550 refresh that could be ready for MY2021. I try my best in Photoshop to create a preview of what the new refresh might look like.
From what I can see out of the spyshots, there are three big differences to the current Mustang:
- Turn Signal + Fog Lights are moved higher into the bumper and not in the triangles anymore
- The triangles in the bumper are totally new
- the area under the headlights is sticking out much more
Here's my rendering:
Same. But they canāt. Itās part of pedestrian safety and crash ratings nowadays. Thereās a reason for that design, but it serves a purpose. The sn95 would hit a pedestrian and theyād survive the soft bumper cover only to be eviscerated by the steel hood. The newer cars have a ācushionā before the hood. The c8 for example has a gigantic area for this in the front. The challenger is done super simply and looks just like you describe. A cap. The camaros makes itās hood look like a toilet bowl lid. The Mustangs isnāt that bad. But it will remain similar to that.
while thatās true to some degreee, in general, there are universal standards. People the world over have at least some overlap on beauty standards. There are some outliers, but that indicates rarity. So MOST people would indicate Brad Pitt as a handsome dude or Nicole sherzinger as an attractive chick. There are some who donāt think either is attractive. But most do. So thatās what is aimed for in creating an aesthetic product - who the āmostā are in your target demographic. So when someone says a car is beautiful, in general, everyone knows what they are talking about. Same thing for an ugly car. Once in a while you have some that are hard to quantify. The 6 gen Camaro for example - deemed a āhotā car by msny. But a total barf bag to just as msny others. Meanwhile, you have the mustsng GT, which was conservatively style out of the gate, but nearly everyone thought it was attractive with some sling it gorgeous and others calling it only decent. But rarely called ugly. So Ford did the better job of creating a car that is universally understood as being beautiful.
