tyler2k
Well-Known Member
oh so sorry phone auto corrected, ill have a talk with it, and how is it a cheap copy when it's alway beating the mustang, hell even in 05 when there was no camaro the 02 camaro was still faster. and you call it cheap yet my 15 in its all of 7200 miles it had on it had the evaporator done twice and was on its way out again. had to be ripped a part and part of the roof repainted to fix a pinch weld that leaked causing water to come In the car (only found this out after the windshield was redone twice) and a driveline vibration that ford called normal. but yea the gm is cheap. and ya the gt500 was awesome, but its performance on a track wasn't repeatable, and the gt350r is an amazing car but looking at any track times the 1le is right on the heels, even matching it on some tracks, so a 1le is right with Ford's halo car despite being half the price after adm and down on power and heavier. but after all its just a cheap copyFord isn't "LAY" to the party. Ford invented the party in 1964 and the Camaro is a cheap copy. Ford reinvented the party in 2005 and history repeated itself with GM bringing the Camaro back as a copy once again.
The GT350R and GT500 performance show what the Mustang is capable of. Performance is one data point and it's foolish to think that people buy a car based on one thing. Otherwise everyone would be buying the 700+ hp full warrantied Mustangs from that place in Ohio. Even the small percentage of people who track their cars still spend 99% of their time commuting to work or driving around town. Most people don't buy a car based on 1% of what they are going to do with it. The priority is a car that is enjoyable for the majority of what you do with it.
Sponsored