Sponsored

Ford Racing ProCal Tune

OP
OP
TheLion

TheLion

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2016
Threads
68
Messages
1,621
Reaction score
601
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
Ruby Red 2016 Mustang GT PP 6-MT
I'm not sure what you mean by "signature", but I can generalize the following: the ECU/PCM is just a micro controller based system, to my knowledge there is nothing special about it. It's programmed in ANSI C or possibly C++ / C Sharp, it has multiple General Purpose IO (GPIO), Pulse Width Modulation (PWM), Analog to Digital Converters (ADC's), possibly Digital to Analog Converters (DAC's), CAN bus controllers, probably I2C bus for external memory (external to the uC, but still on the same circuit board). These are all pretty standard things, the program is stored in the FLASH or EEPROM depending on what your doing with it and the particular uC architecture.

It's possible there is a co-processor which performs secondary tasks, such as controlling the automatic transmission, but with speeds in the 100's of MHz and single clock execution of standard C instructions I think that's much less common except in may trucks due to the application. Technically you could pull the Ford Racing tune, but you would need to know the exact compiler and development environment used to re-construct the program into human readable form, otherwise your literally pulling kilobytes or megabytes of 1's and 0's which you could not possibly make sense of. Alternatively if you had the source files from the development environment, which is the program in human readable form, you could easily edit anything you like, compile it and flash the uC with the new hex file.

There's quite a few out there, Microchip MPLab X, Atmel AVR Studio, I forget the typical one that ARM uses for their own processors, but those are just examples. BTW many of the Mircochip and Atmel processors actually use ARM cores, but then build up their own peripherals (all the fun sounding words above like PWM). I guess to answer your question simplistically, you would need the source files, the compiler and development environment to edit them properly and generate a functional Hex file to actually program into the uC. Some one who has an open line of communications with the OE could probably do that, but we little "customers" probably would have quite a time doing so.

Although, if anyone has a fried PCM, if you take it apart and send me photos of the circuit board, in particular the larger surface mount chips with lots of pins I could at least find out some details on the processor specs. My PCM housing said Bosch on it, so I wonder if Ford is using off-the shelf PCM's developed by Bosh and then writing their own software? It would make sense as there is a huge cost and time associated with developing the hardware alone, let alone the complex layers of software.
Sponsored

 

Juben

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Threads
35
Messages
2,519
Reaction score
809
Location
Chattanooga, TN
First Name
Justin
Vehicle(s)
2015 EcoBoost Mustang (AT) w/PP
I thought he was probably referring to something similar to the checksum, md5, for an Android ROM. And from what I remember, it seems like Ford does use an off-the-shelf ECU. I read a discussion on that a long time ago, but I don't remember right off where it was at, maybe FocusST.org?
 

shelbywannabe

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2015
Threads
47
Messages
1,526
Reaction score
314
Location
Orlando FL
First Name
Robert
Vehicle(s)
2016 Black Mustang GT PP
Wow. I just received my 2017 ECB and installed a CP-E IC last weekend. I had put only about 250 miles on it before the install, and thought I noticed a lag it didn't have before the change in IC. I checked it off to having a new car and not being keen to differences yet since I just got the thing and maybe I didn't notice the lag before. Now you have me wondering if it is a real difference.
I noticed a lag the first couple of times I drove it but I figured maybe the ECU needed to make an adjustment maybe ? All I can say is that lag has gone and the car is running really well now.
 

jbailer

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 1, 2015
Threads
43
Messages
3,270
Reaction score
1,297
Location
Maryland
First Name
Joe
Vehicle(s)
2015 EB Magnetic Premium PP 50AP
My car always runs best right after I wash and wax it.

I never trust the butt dyno. I'd have to see a before and after log to see the lag. All of the aftermarket ICs that I'm aware of have a pretty low pressure drop. Plus, think of how quickly that little extra drop is made up. I don't know how fast it is but I'm sure it's fast enough that we wouldn't feel it.
 

Livernois Motorsports

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2014
Threads
226
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
955
Location
Dearborn Heights, Michigan
Website
www.livernoismotorsports.com
First Name
S550 HQ
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT (TVS 2650) (6R80)
When we tune for the addition of our 160° EvenFlo tstat we have to actually address in several tables that we are adjusting the operating temps, fan initiation temps as well as several things from a performance perspective that allow us to increase power output.
 

Sponsored

ForYourOwnGood

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Threads
41
Messages
1,396
Reaction score
627
Location
Central MA
Vehicle(s)
2017 Grabber Blue 5.0
I thought he was probably referring to something similar to the checksum, md5, for an Android ROM. And from what I remember, it seems like Ford does use an off-the-shelf ECU. I read a discussion on that a long time ago, but I don't remember right off where it was at, maybe FocusST.org?
This is basically what I mean, is can Ford scanners detect the difference between which tune was used. These newer ECU's seem to know that the tune was changed forever while the older ones would only retain that info for a certain amount of drive cycles.
 

Turbong

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 11, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
316
Reaction score
84
Location
SoCal
Vehicle(s)
2016 RR EB 6MT PP Recaros
This is basically what I mean, is can Ford scanners detect the difference between which tune was used. These newer ECU's seem to know that the tune was changed forever while the older ones would only retain that info for a certain amount of drive cycles.
They have would have to know the difference, because when they do a updated factory flash it will show date, time and version.
 

gotboost?

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2015
Threads
7
Messages
71
Reaction score
24
Location
MD
Vehicle(s)
Triple Yellow
Ford Performance Racing Parts NZ lists the 2.3L Ecoboost tune results in an increase from 233kw to 290Kw (312hp to 388hp - doesn't state TQ figures). They list Tune, Air, and Exhaust along with strut bar and badging. Would love to see most of that makes it to the US version.
 

Regs

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Threads
5
Messages
546
Reaction score
79
Location
NJ
Vehicle(s)
Mustang 2016 Echoboost
Ford Performance Racing Parts NZ lists the 2.3L Ecoboost tune results in an increase from 233kw to 290Kw (312hp to 388hp - doesn't state TQ figures). They list Tune, Air, and Exhaust along with strut bar and badging. Would love to see most of that makes it to the US version.
That must be a stage 2 or 3 tune. Adding a strut bar and exhaust = $$$.
 

datamon

Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2016
Threads
3
Messages
24
Reaction score
4
Location
Montgomery County MD
Vehicle(s)
2016 DIB Ecoboost
From http://mustang.net.nz/call-stu/item/431-ford-performance-racing-parts

EcoBoostTM Upgrade Packages

STAGE 1 RRP fitted: $3,700 + GST

  • Power Upgrade from 233kW (312hp) to 240kW (321hp) (+7kW/9hp)
  • Sports Exhaust (from axle back) with sound enhancement
  • GT Strut Tower Brace
  • Air box
  • Official 'Ford Racing' Badging
STAGE 2 RRP fitted: $5,700 + GST
  • Power Upgrade from 233kW (312hp) to 290kW (388hp) (+57kW/76hp)
  • Sports Exhaust (from cat back) with sound enhancement
  • GT Strut Tower Brace
  • Air box & engine retune
  • Official 'Ford Racing' Badging


5,700.00 NZD = 4,167.742 USD
 

Sponsored

Juben

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Threads
35
Messages
2,519
Reaction score
809
Location
Chattanooga, TN
First Name
Justin
Vehicle(s)
2015 EcoBoost Mustang (AT) w/PP
The FoST calibrations are $595, so I'd guess the EBM would be similar in pricing.
 
OP
OP
TheLion

TheLion

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2016
Threads
68
Messages
1,621
Reaction score
601
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
Ruby Red 2016 Mustang GT PP 6-MT
I noticed a lag the first couple of times I drove it but I figured maybe the ECU needed to make an adjustment maybe ? All I can say is that lag has gone and the car is running really well now.
How about traction control? I experienced what I thought was "lag" first few times, but due to much more consistent torque output, I came to realize the rear brakes were clamping down to prevent wheel spin in a few of the instances I perceived as "lag".
 
OP
OP
TheLion

TheLion

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2016
Threads
68
Messages
1,621
Reaction score
601
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
Ruby Red 2016 Mustang GT PP 6-MT
From http://mustang.net.nz/call-stu/item/431-ford-performance-racing-parts

EcoBoostTM Upgrade Packages

STAGE 1 RRP fitted: $3,700 + GST

  • Power Upgrade from 233kW (312hp) to 240kW (321hp) (+7kW/9hp)
  • Sports Exhaust (from axle back) with sound enhancement
  • GT Strut Tower Brace
  • Air box
  • Official 'Ford Racing' Badging
STAGE 2 RRP fitted: $5,700 + GST
  • Power Upgrade from 233kW (312hp) to 290kW (388hp) (+57kW/76hp)
  • Sports Exhaust (from cat back) with sound enhancement
  • GT Strut Tower Brace
  • Air box & engine retune
  • Official 'Ford Racing' Badging


5,700.00 NZD = 4,167.742 USD
Yikes! That is pricey, I wonder how much torque is gained (especially at the top end where it needs to hold torque to keep a strong power band) and if you can buy just the PCM software and programmer without the bundle?

You could achieve much better power for a lot less going it after market...and upgrade critical parts such as the IC, thermostat, colder plugs, catch can etc...
 

nolezack

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Threads
0
Messages
96
Reaction score
22
Location
MA
Vehicle(s)
2015 EBM Performance Pack
FRPP told me today that the ProCal tune releases next week. We shall see...
 

Busser48

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2015
Threads
40
Messages
1,637
Reaction score
171
Location
La
Vehicle(s)
2015 mustang ecoboost
How about traction control? I experienced what I thought was "lag" first few times, but due to much more consistent torque output, I came to realize the rear brakes were clamping down to prevent wheel spin in a few of the instances I perceived as "lag".
I thought traction control cut power to the rear not applied the brakes?
Sponsored

 
 








Top