Sponsored

2015-17 Mustang GT Ford Performance Power Packs

B0SS603

@dib_5.0
Joined
Aug 28, 2015
Threads
12
Messages
271
Reaction score
144
Location
Ft. Worth, TX
First Name
Jacques
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT Premium Deep Impact Blue
Vehicle Showcase
1
[ame]

PP3 install and Dyno for those who have been waiting on LMR's video. It's here!
Sponsored

 

1320'

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Threads
19
Messages
3,758
Reaction score
1,616
Location
Medford,Oregon
Vehicle(s)
2011 Avenger...sadly
Cliff notes:

Torque loss of around 20 foot lbs from 3,700 to 4,000ish RPM. Highest gain under the curve looks to be around 35(!!) foot pounds at 5,000.

GT350 manifold starts pulling away at 5,100 for HP and by 6,000 RPM is up by about 35-40 HP.

The power figures do cross at 5,250 in this graph.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2016
Threads
21
Messages
1,078
Reaction score
394
Location
GA
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
Cliff notes:

Torque loss of around 20 foot lbs from 3,700 to 4,000ish RPM. Highest gain under the curve looks to be around 35(!!) foot pounds at 5,000.

GT350 manifold starts pulling away at 5,100 for HP and by 6,000 RPM is up by about 35-40 HP.

The power figures do cross at 5,250 in this graph.
captureyfs9s.png
 

Sponsored

Ambrotos

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Threads
6
Messages
96
Reaction score
60
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT Premium Package
Update on my PP2 install:

- I have the rev hang only on initial startup with (cold engine). Goes away once start driving.
- I do feel the abrupt deceleration once in a while when lifting off the throttle

- Fuel economy has improved during long haul.
- Before PP2 install - Raleigh, NC to D.C. = 23.4 MPG @75 MPH
- After PP2 install - Raleigh, NC to D.C. = 26.0 MPG @75 MPH

Lator
I just drove to SC from Florida. I was sitting at 26.3 MPG @ 85-90 MPH. Being able to be in 6th gear made the difference I think.
 

walkerracing23

New Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2017
Threads
0
Messages
3
Reaction score
6
Location
ATL
Vehicle(s)
Mustang GT
Does the car feel stronger after the IM upgrade? Seems like a lot of money for more HP only above 5K rpms.
 

Kinjirra

I R Slow
Joined
Aug 30, 2016
Threads
17
Messages
640
Reaction score
273
Location
Chapel Hill, TN
First Name
Brian
Vehicle(s)
16 Ruby Red GT W/PP, 401a
Vehicle Showcase
1
From the graph the low end numbers look good. Increases in both torque and HP at 2k. Seems like thats the daily driver zone(at least for me when normal driving). More usable power down low in a good thing imho. Or is there something in that graph im missing?
 

RomanB

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2015
Threads
8
Messages
226
Reaction score
45
Location
Casa Grande AZ
Vehicle(s)
2015 5.0
Does the car feel stronger after the IM upgrade? Seems like a lot of money for more HP only above 5K rpms.
Yes the car rips. It feels very comparable to stock under 5k, above that it pulls hard through 7700. Best mod for a N/A engine besides headers. FYI I am still running the stock intake.
 

mbeale68

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2016
Threads
4
Messages
130
Reaction score
33
Location
Santa Monica, CA
First Name
Mike
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT, base, perf pack, recaros, 5spd, guard
It would be interesting to see an overlay of LMR's PP2 and PP3 results.
 

Sponsored

slowbutfast

Active Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Threads
3
Messages
25
Reaction score
2
Location
North Louisiana
First Name
Mike
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP
Feels like we had been waiting on this video forever.

That is some nice top end. I can almost justify the purchase
 

MarkH

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Threads
4
Messages
332
Reaction score
66
Location
Sunshine state
Vehicle(s)
2017 Magnetic GT PP Vert
Last edited:

Gibbo205

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2015
Threads
156
Messages
6,673
Reaction score
2,208
Location
UK
Vehicle(s)
UK 2015 Mustang & BMW E46 M3
Does the car feel stronger after the IM upgrade? Seems like a lot of money for more HP only above 5K rpms.
I did a dyno comparison on my own car with Lund tuning, under 6000rpm the cars power and torque was pretty much identical to how it was previously on the Lund tune, though the torque peaks were slightly lower but flatter. I did however go from 472HP upto 516HP with peak power around 7200rpm.

On the road the car feels stronger everywhere, it is simply nicer to drive which I am putting down to the flatter torque curve which also holds for much longer.

I also tested the two throttle bodies, the GT 350 one made around 10HP more beyond 6200rpm, otherwise below this they both made identical power and torque.

GT 350 TB is a touch snappier on response and gives the car a deeper sound, in cold weather on a cold start the 350 TB is ever so slightly touchy, but nothing to worry about, again on Lund tune, on Ford cal its probably fine.

Stock GT is a touch smoother but not as snappy and the car does not sound as deep, no problem with cold start at all on stock TB.

I have stuck with the GT 350 TB as its positives outweigh the negatives and being in the UK our climate is cooler, in hotter regions of US 350 TB all the way.
 

Sasuketr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Threads
61
Messages
2,549
Reaction score
353
Location
Chicago,IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ingot Silver GTPP
That is a really nice torque curve! I wouldn't worry too much about the puny loss on lower rpm range. What is amazing is the torque stays around and above 350 lbft from 3000 rpm to almost 7000 rpm vs 5500 rpm, and car keeps pulling till 7300 rpm. This is also on stock headers right? Headers should add another 10 lbft and 15 to 20 more whp. Add flex fuel tune with e85 on top of that and thats NA 500 hp of glory!!
Sponsored

 
 




Top