Which engine for 2015 Mustang?

[GTsquid]

I will always have a v8 in my garage but a turbo 4 might be fun also. Personally rather own the 4 than the 6, but that's just me.

I think the 6 is going the way of the dinosaur soon. It's neither here nor there. You can get better MPG, way more power with a tune, and be lighter, better weight proportions AND be more fun to drive. You want power and performance, get a v8. Simple as that.

Can anyone think of one advantage the v6 offers that a turbo 4 wouldn't?

The 3.7 is a tried and true engine that gives solid N/A factory numbers. The reliability and longevity of a 4 cylinder turbo in a Mustang with an aggressive tune (if rumors are to be believed) is still an open question. If I had to choose one to drive for 10 years, I'd go with the V6.

Sponsored

 

[Prodigy]

I wouldn't mind seeing the 2.7L Ecoboost V6. It should be able to make at least 310hp and 365 ft-lbs torque. We all know the real wiggle room that Ford has to play with is the non-enthusiast models where buyers won't mind as much. This would be a good replacement for the 3.7L since its been designed already for RWD application and would be a more reliable long term than a 4 cylinder EB making that kind of power.

 

[8cyl]

Here's what I'd LIKE to see even though it probably wont happen:

Mustang - NA 3.7L V6 305HP/280LBFT
Mustang SVO - EB 2.3L I4 330HP/290LBFT
Mustang GT - NA 5.0 V8 440HP/400LBFT
Mustang GT350 - EB 3.5L V6 400HP/450LBFT
Mustang GT500 - EB 5.0L V8 675HP/660LBFT

I know, I know, the setup for the GT350 comes way too close to the GT but I'd like to see them start experimenting with the turbo v6 if only to get their feet whet with a limited edition.

If we see another SE like the GT350, I would think they would just utilize DI on the 5.0 instead of bringing yet another engine into the fold. Maybe keep the current GT specs while reserving the close to 475hp from those recent rumors. 4 different engine offerings in a car that sells less than 100k units a year just doesn't make a lot of sense. They hardly do this for even the f-150 and fusion which sell in MUCH greater quantities.

 

[Falc'man]

A Mustang with 2.3 Ecoboost is going to embarrass many, many cars. I'm guessing that'll weigh about 3200lbs? The amount of torque means it'll outpace the V6, and less mass over the front will turn it into one of the best handling vehicles on the market. Z better watch it's back.

In fact I think it's a mistake for Ford to badge this as Mustang, because it could be aimed at a different demographic and become popular for it's balance, which could upset the purists if it's constantly rated as a better all round driver's vehicle than the GT, for example.

It's probably too costly but unique front and rear styling and... what was that badge... the... ahh.. aha! Capri...!

Toyota do the same with Camry and Aurion (I think you guys call it Avalon). One's a four-pot "medium" car, and the other is a "large" six cylinder family vehicle. They're both dimensionally identical.

Same could be done here with this platform. I just can't come to terms with a four-cyl Mustang.

 

[stangray11]

A Mustang with 2.3 Ecoboost is going to embarrass many, many cars. I'm guessing that'll weigh about 3200lbs? The amount of torque means it'll outpace the V6, and less mass over the front will turn it into one of the best handling vehicles on the market. Z better watch it's back.

In fact I think it's a mistake for Ford to badge this as Mustang, because it could be aimed at a different demographic and become popular for it's balance, which could upset the purists if it's constantly rated as a better all round driver's vehicle than the GT, for example.

It's probably too costly but unique front and rear styling and... what was that badge... the... ahh.. aha! Capri...!

Toyota do the same with Camry and Aurion (I think you guys call it Avalon). One's a four-pot "medium" car, and the other is a "large" six cylinder family vehicle. They're both dimensionally identical.

Same could be done here with this platform. I just can't come to terms with a four-cyl Mustang.

Agreed. A lot of people missing the point about the 4 banger mustang IMO. We can argue all day long about whether it belongs in a pony car, even though we all know it did and was a screamer, but to me the biggest risk of the 4 banger is exactly as you say -it may be too good so as to possibly tarnish the higher trim mustang and piss off a lot of GT owners who dont even see it as a real pony car.

Sounds like Ford is going to tune it for a conservative 270hp which really puts the 4-cylinder in a weird spot. It's not powerful enough to call a Mustang, yet being lighter, having better weight distribution and with aftermarket tuners, it could easily rival the GT in overall performance. I see this as somewhat similar to the Boss 302 embarrassing the shit out of the overpriced GT500 on the track. At over 200+ hp and 250lb-ft torque disadvantage and $15k discount, the Boss 302 thoroughly trumps the GT500 in just about every performance measure except straight line IIRC. Gonna be interesting seeing how this new trim is gonna play out.... they need to tread carefully IMO.

 

[Allerick]

I love the sound and power of the V8, but I'm looking to get this as a daily driver. As a result fuel economy is definitely being considered (granted only but so much because I'm still looking at a Mustang after all). I am sort of torn between the V6 and the turbo 4.

In some ways the 4 is more appealing if it isn't the base model. To me it makes the car seem more unique. It means you have something that isn't simply the lowest model Mustang. With that said if it makes less than 300 hp then it would be tough for me to want. Plus I know the V6 is likely to sound better. It would be tough for me to want an Ecostang.

I agree the V6 has to remain.

I'm gonna wait to see if the turbo 4 is a 2.0L or 2.3L.... been hearing conflicting things about that.

Either way I hope Ford takes the 4 banger seriously and not just throwing it out as an Eco option. Give it performance options like a track pack option, recaros, etc. Maybe then people will take it seriously instead of being the butt of jokes.

I agree man. They need to really sell it as a performance alternative rather than just simply economical. It needs a certain appeal. Performance options could really help Ford market it as the more nimble variant. Rather that it seeming weaker (in terms of hp) make it a different approach. I think the V6 should still make more power, but please don't make the turbo 4 feel weak.

 

[D Griff]

If I get one I'll probably go V8. All of my cars have been four cylinders up to this point other than a brief stint with a Taurus with the 3.0 V6 :frusty:

I'm also afraid that in 5-10 more years there will be no more V8 cars to be purchased, so I kind of want to at least get the chance to own one. Although the lighter weight of the other models is appealing to me since I'm an autox/track kinda guy. I'm hoping the V8 with track pack comes in at 3400 pounds or so, that would just be a sweet ride all around.

I may also consider the V6, it's fuel efficient, lighter, still fast, reliable, etc. I kind of need a break from the turbo 4 thing for my next ride, I don't like to just buy the same type of car time and time again, so as much as I love my GTI, that's why I'm thinking a 5.0 may be for me

 

[HTownStang]

So long as there are trucks and muscle cars, the V8 is going nowhere. You may see more Eco 4 and 6 options try to take down those sales numbers for the overall fleet average but it will always be offered.

V8 all the way for me. I would not consider anything else unless we ever see a twin turbo V6 in the mix. The way Ford is going it feels like it will stay exclusive to the trucks and maybe used for a Lincoln in the future.

 

[Deroxas2.0]

If I get one I'll probably go V8. All of my cars have been four cylinders up to this point other than a brief stint with a Taurus with the 3.0 V6 :frusty:

I'm also afraid that in 5-10 more years there will be no more V8 cars to be purchased, so I kind of want to at least get the chance to own one. Although the lighter weight of the other models is appealing to me since I'm an autox/track kinda guy. I'm hoping the V8 with track pack comes in at 3400 pounds or so, that would just be a sweet ride all around.

Have you driven a V8 before? Totally different experience and totally perfectly fits the character of a Pony/Muscle car like the Mustang! It's going to be such an upgrade from the 4 and 6 cylinder cars you've had. Definitely spring for the V8 if it's in your budget

Also if you're a auto-x track guy, a naturally aspirated V8 is going to be behave so much better than a turbo 4 cylinder.

 

[Diggitydog]

Had two 3.7 liter V6 units. Upgraded the second one. The 2015 will be a V8.

 

[ZachR]

What mainly got me interested initially in the 6th gen over a '14 was the fact that we could possibly get a inline 4 Mustang here in the States. I'm really holding out some hope that it makes it's way here, as the engine in the ST is a blast to drive.

If the inline 4 isn't sold here, I'll probably be severely less interested. My second choice would be the V6, but then the looks would really have to sell me. I don't really care for the V8, as it's too much power to use (legally) on the streets and I can't afford the gas guzzling with how much I commute.

I really hope that if we do get the turbo 4 here, it's priced closer to the V6 rather than the V8.

 

[nametoshowothers]

What ever the shelby comes with

 

[Wes B.]

Personally, I would love to see a special enthusiast trim -- tuned and NA 5.8l V8 (500+ hp) mated to a traditional 4-speed manual, 3.31 gears, 255/45-R18 Kumho Ecsta LE Sport tires, etc.

 

[Unchained]

As part of the regular line up? NA GT500?

 

[Wes B.]

As part of the regular line up? NA GT500?

Kinda like an NA GT500 mixed with a Cobra Jet. I'd love to see it as a limited edition for the true enthusiasts who drag race, go to the track, and daily drive their sports cars.

Sponsored