Sponsored

what do you guys think bout this setup

Caballito

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Threads
43
Messages
393
Reaction score
15
Location
Sacramento, ca
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT Base
hi guyes so what do u guys think bout this setup for track and street? here are the part ls and part numbers..
camber plates 5558139 $270
adjustable shocks 5558157 $800
sway bars 5551017 $460
linear springs 555 8208 $240
Sponsored

 

wmfateam

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2017
Threads
11
Messages
318
Reaction score
142
Location
Arizona
Website
www.facebook.com
First Name
Whitey
Vehicle(s)
2017 LB GT PP
Vehicle Showcase
1
If those are the Utlralites, that is the same set up I have. Plus the diff and subframe bushings/braces. I track once a month and drive three times a week. Less bumpy, but more firm than the stock PP. I love it.
 

Grafanton

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2016
Threads
13
Messages
166
Reaction score
66
Location
Cleveland,OH
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ecoboost PP 6MT
If those are the Utlralites, that is the same set up I have. Plus the diff and subframe bushings/braces. I track once a month and drive three times a week. Less bumpy, but more firm than the stock PP. I love it.
Yep. Exact same here. Track once a month & DD.
On the road there is considerably less bouncing and hobby horsing. There is a slight increase in NVH and there are a couple of new creaks, although this could easily be contributed to the 53K miles on the car.
On the track, I have everything set at full soft and haven't yet had the chance to experiment with all the setting available. My general impression is that it's shifted the car to gentle oversteer on corner entry. Other than that, mostly neutral. At full soft on the bars, the is slightly less body roll, but not so you'd notice.
My main reason for doing all this was to improve tire wear at the track, I'm fairly startled at the improvement. On the stock suspension, the left front tire took an incredible beating, cording the outside edge after just a couple of events. Now...hard to even notice.
Steeda customer service is really quite good. I have no problem giving them my money.
 
OP
OP

Caballito

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Threads
43
Messages
393
Reaction score
15
Location
Sacramento, ca
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT Base
Do u not like the linear springs? I heard the dual rate wer bouncy
 

Sponsored

Static_LV

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2016
Threads
4
Messages
205
Reaction score
53
Location
Las Vegas
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Prem PP, 1969 Mustang Coupe
Personally, I would avoid this solution for anything performance related. I have an issue with companies who provide technical specifications like:

"Highest spring rate for dramatic improvement in handling and reduction of nosedive"
"Rebound adjustable for the ultimate in tunability"

Provide the actual spring rates and shock dynos so people can make an informed decision if these parts will work for their application.

This is like a company providing specs like:

"Highest compression pistons for maximum performance"
"Variable gap spark plugs for the ultimate in tunability"

No one who is building an engine would accept those as technical specs and suspension is no less important. This level of information from a purported performance company is just silly.
 

wmfateam

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2017
Threads
11
Messages
318
Reaction score
142
Location
Arizona
Website
www.facebook.com
First Name
Whitey
Vehicle(s)
2017 LB GT PP
Vehicle Showcase
1
Personally, I would avoid this solution for anything performance related. I have an issue with companies who provide technical specifications like:

"Highest spring rate for dramatic improvement in handling and reduction of nosedive"
"Rebound adjustable for the ultimate in tunability"

Provide the actual spring rates and shock dynos so people can make an informed decision if these parts will work for their application.

This is like a company providing specs like:

"Highest compression pistons for maximum performance"
"Variable gap spark plugs for the ultimate in tunability"

No one who is building an engine would accept those as technical specs and suspension is no less important. This level of information from a purported performance company is just silly.
They do have a list of all their springs with rates on their website. http://www.steeda.com/assets/documents/Steeda%20S550%20Spring%20Guide%20UPDATED_12april2018.pdf

As far as shock/strut dyno graphs, what are some companies that show theirs? Honestly interested. I had my SN95 valved and dynod and was able to see and then feel the difference. I had to dyno them before I took them apart to see what Bilstein did to them from the factory.
 

NightmareMoon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2015
Threads
62
Messages
7,077
Reaction score
6,343
Location
Austin
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP w/ Voodoo
Vehicle Showcase
1
Personally, I would avoid this solution for anything performance related. I have an issue with companies who provide technical specifications like:

"Highest spring rate for dramatic improvement in handling and reduction of nosedive"
"Rebound adjustable for the ultimate in tunability"

Provide the actual spring rates and shock dynos so people can make an informed decision if these parts will work for their application.

This is like a company providing specs like:

"Highest compression pistons for maximum performance"
"Variable gap spark plugs for the ultimate in tunability"

No one who is building an engine would accept those as technical specs and suspension is no less important. This level of information from a purported performance company is just silly.
The spring rates are available in the Suspension subforum in a sticky thread at the top.

At the pro-action shock price point, it’s not common to see published shock dynos, and I’m not sure how consistent they are off the assembly line anyway. Customers spending < $1k on shocks usually can’t read a shock dyno anyway.

I might shop around for different camber plates. I hear there are others that are perhaps easier to adjust.

If a spring is bouncy, it’s nearly always because the shock it was paired with was not correct to match the spring rate. IIRC, Steeda runs some $$$$ MCS shocks on their race car with the competition springs. With stock or mildly upgraded Steeda non-adjustable or Ford Performance shocks I wouldn’t be surprised if the Steeda comp prints were bouncy. Higher spring rates need more shock.
 

tj@steeda

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Mar 21, 2014
Threads
583
Messages
6,940
Reaction score
4,437
Location
Florida
First Name
Timothy
Vehicle(s)
2019 Steeda Mustang - White Carbon Edition
Vehicle Showcase
1
hi guyes so what do u guys think bout this setup for track and street? here are the part ls and part numbers..
camber plates 5558139 $270
adjustable shocks 5558157 $800
sway bars 5551017 $460
linear springs 555 8208 $240
Happy to set you up with a consultation with our suspension team to put you in the best package that will suit your needs - with of course, forum pricing.

Shoot me an email to [email protected].

TJ
 

Static_LV

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2016
Threads
4
Messages
205
Reaction score
53
Location
Las Vegas
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Prem PP, 1969 Mustang Coupe

Sponsored

Kinjirra

I R Slow
Joined
Aug 30, 2016
Threads
17
Messages
640
Reaction score
273
Location
Chapel Hill, TN
First Name
Brian
Vehicle(s)
16 Ruby Red GT W/PP, 401a
Vehicle Showcase
1
Personally, I would avoid this solution for anything performance related. I have an issue with companies who provide technical specifications like:

"Highest spring rate for dramatic improvement in handling and reduction of nosedive"
"Rebound adjustable for the ultimate in tunability"

Provide the actual spring rates and shock dynos so people can make an informed decision if these parts will work for their application.

This is like a company providing specs like:

"Highest compression pistons for maximum performance"
"Variable gap spark plugs for the ultimate in tunability"

No one who is building an engine would accept those as technical specs and suspension is no less important. This level of information from a purported performance company is just silly.
Considering we are talking about Steeda who has specialized in Mustangs forever and have a number of winning cars... it like saying Edelbrock doesn't know manifolds or Holly doesn't know carbs..

As an owner of their Linear ultralight springs and Non Adjustable shocks I would say their products deliver and are top notch.
 

AZFord

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 2, 2017
Threads
7
Messages
71
Reaction score
26
Location
Peoria, AZ
Vehicle(s)
2017 401a GT/PP
Do u not like the linear springs? I heard the dual rate wer bouncy
Quite the opposite. I love my Steeda linear springs but that's all I initially installed. Now that I've done a couple HPDE days, I've found that I want sway bars to help with body roll and need camber plates to keep the outside edges of the front tires from shredding. If I'm going through all that effort, I might as well replace my struts too. :) It's an OCD downward spiral.

As for the dual rate springs, I suggest looking at the suspension forum thread on those. I believe it was nothing but praise. My linears are not harsh on the street and suspect I could get away with even higher rate without making the car too much for the street.
Sponsored

 
 








Top