Dusten
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2018
- Threads
- 14
- Messages
- 822
- Reaction score
- 584
- Location
- Conway, Wa
- First Name
- Dusten
- Vehicle(s)
- 2018 Ford Mustang, 2001 Ford Lightning, 1968 Ford Mustang
No different, why would it be different? You keep your RPM in the same area that you would want as you would with a manual. I think it lessens brake pad wear too since you engine brake a bit more similar to having a manual. I got like 9.5 mpg on my manual 630 rwhp cts-v on e60 and I get about 11.5 on e85 on my 2018 mustang, 15.7 on 93 octane all with lots of spirited driving and WOT 7500+ pulls etc.
I also got around 15 mpg on my manual 93 octane tuned 2011 mustang gt. I got 17 mpg on my auto 1999 maxima that didnt have paddle shifters (back in like 2003-2007), 12 mpg on my auto 93 octane tuned 2011 6500 lb fx4 f150. Just depends on how you drive and I mainly drive for fun.
I suppose its more like 85% of the time im paddle shifting, its whenever I am driving for fun and the weather is good. In traffic or bad weather I usually wont bother.
Lessening break pad wear by increasing wear on the clutches and steels. Sounds good.
Sponsored