Sponsored

Spark Plugs - Please Read

Status
Not open for further replies.

EcoSwag1990

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2014
Threads
60
Messages
3,281
Reaction score
910
Location
West Chester, PA
Vehicle(s)
2016 Triple Yellow GT
You listed the gap 0.027-0.028 but Spark Plugs on your link are 0.044"
Is it ok?
You need to use a gapping tool to gap them to the right width yourself
Sponsored

 

iljalop

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2014
Threads
11
Messages
123
Reaction score
21
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang EcoBoost
You need to use a gapping tool to gap them to the right width yourself
So this is not Plug&Play solution.
Sorry for that kind of stupid question but - is it hard to break the upper part of a spark plug when adjusting the gap? I have a freaking out phobia that something can fall down to cylinder.
 

EcoSwag1990

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2014
Threads
60
Messages
3,281
Reaction score
910
Location
West Chester, PA
Vehicle(s)
2016 Triple Yellow GT
So this is not Plug&Play solution.
Sorry for that kind of stupid question but - is it hard to break the upper part of a spark plug when adjusting the gap? I have a freaking out phobia that something can fall down to cylinder.
Even for someone who hasn't done it before gapping the plugs will probably take less than 2 mins with the tool. I have those plugs and the prong was really flexible and would be tough to break. It's the ceramic part that you want to be careful not to bang into anything because it will shatter
 

iljalop

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2014
Threads
11
Messages
123
Reaction score
21
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang EcoBoost
Even for someone who hasn't done it before gapping the plugs will probably take less than 2 mins with the tool. I have those plugs and the prong was really flexible and would be tough to break. It's the ceramic part that you want to be careful not to bang into anything because it will shatter
I will buy a right tool for that. Thanks man. Will adjust it on Weekend let's see will it fix my problem with the ridiculously shaking engine...
 

ELPYBOOST

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2014
Threads
3
Messages
165
Reaction score
14
Location
Toronto, Canada
First Name
Eugene
Vehicle(s)
2015 Race Red Mustang EB Premium w/ PP and Navi
You listed the gap 0.027-0.028 but Spark Plugs on your link are 0.044"
Is it ok?
You have to gap them yourself. When I got mine they were gaped at 0.034. Then gapped them at 0.027.
 

Sponsored

wmsky33

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2015
Threads
0
Messages
180
Reaction score
46
Location
Georgetown, TX
First Name
Bill
Vehicle(s)
2015 EB PP 6MT Competition Orange
You have to gap them yourself. When I got mine they were gaped at 0.034. Then gapped them at 0.027.
This FAQ was pulled from NGK's list of FAQs at http://www.ngksparkplugs.ca/tech-info-spark-plug-faq.cfm#header

Q: What is the maximum I can open or close the gap?

A: NGK doesn't recommend adjusting the spark plug gap < or > .008". The reason for this is the ground electrode and center electrode won't line up properly, hindering spark plug performance.​

So, you should be good.
 

wmsky33

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2015
Threads
0
Messages
180
Reaction score
46
Location
Georgetown, TX
First Name
Bill
Vehicle(s)
2015 EB PP 6MT Competition Orange
I always use anti-seize compound on the threads of new plugs and dielectric grease on the spark plug boots any time I change plugs. Anti-seize makes it so much easier to pull the plugs later, and dielectric grease makes it so much easier to pull the boots off the plugs. It's not that big a deal if you are constantly pulling plugs because then the plugs and boots don't have time to bind, but if you leave the plugs and boots alone for greater than 25000 miles, they can get stuck and be a real bear to get out.
 

Sponsored

nanotech

Active Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2015
Threads
1
Messages
40
Reaction score
9
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
2015 EcoBoost Fastback w/ Performance Package, 6MT
I always use anti-seize compound on the threads of new plugs and dielectric grease on the spark plug boots any time I change plugs. Anti-seize makes it so much easier to pull the plugs later, and dielectric grease makes it so much easier to pull the boots off the plugs. It's not that big a deal if you are constantly pulling plugs because then the plugs and boots don't have time to bind, but if you leave the plugs and boots alone for greater than 25000 miles, they can get stuck and be a real bear to get out.
I also used to put anti-seize on spark plugs, but modern plating has eliminated the need to do this. In fact, there is also a risk of thread damage when using anti-seize, as it's easier to inadvertently over-tighten the plugs.

See NGK's advice here:

http://www.ngksparkplugs.com/pdf/dyk_5points.pdf
 

wmsky33

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2015
Threads
0
Messages
180
Reaction score
46
Location
Georgetown, TX
First Name
Bill
Vehicle(s)
2015 EB PP 6MT Competition Orange
I also used to put anti-seize on spark plugs, but modern plating has eliminated the need to do this. In fact, there is also a risk of thread damage when using anti-seize, as it's easier to inadvertently over-tighten the plugs.

See NGK's advice here:

http://www.ngksparkplugs.com/pdf/dyk_5points.pdf
Yes, I should have been more clear. On the initial install of NGK plugs, and probably other brands as well, you don't need anti-seize. However, the trivalent plating on NGK plugs is designed to break away during removal (see this NGK tech bulletin, http://www.jagrepair.com/images/AutoRepairPhotos/NGK_TB-0630111antisieze.pdf, which to me means it's not there for any subsequent install. Even NGK says to use anti-seize on spark plugs that don't have a special plating on the threads. I have used anti-seize for over 30 years, ever since I stripped the threads in a spark plug hole because the spark plug threads had bound to threads in the head, and have never had a problem, although I also don't use a torque wrench to install the plugs, and never had a problem with that either. If you do use anti-seize and a torque wrench, I would decrease the torque value by 20%, since that's what the NGK tech bulletin posted by nanotech states is what over-torque values they've seen.
 

nanotech

Active Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2015
Threads
1
Messages
40
Reaction score
9
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
2015 EcoBoost Fastback w/ Performance Package, 6MT
Yes, I should have been more clear. On the initial install of NGK plugs, and probably other brands as well, you don't need anti-seize. However, the trivalent plating on NGK plugs is designed to break away during removal (see this NGK tech bulletin, http://www.jagrepair.com/images/AutoRepairPhotos/NGK_TB-0630111antisieze.pdf, which to me means it's not there for any subsequent install. Even NGK says to use anti-seize on spark plugs that don't have a special plating on the threads. I have used anti-seize for over 30 years, ever since I stripped the threads in a spark plug hole because the spark plug threads had bound to threads in the head, and have never had a problem, although I also don't use a torque wrench to install the plugs, and never had a problem with that either. If you do use anti-seize and a torque wrench, I would decrease the torque value by 20%, since that's what the NGK tech bulletin posted by nanotech states is what over-torque values they've seen.
Interesting! I had no idea that the plating on the threads was only effective on the initial installation. Good to know!
 

therealdannye

President of Capitol S550
Joined
Jul 3, 2015
Threads
18
Messages
392
Reaction score
60
Location
DMV
Vehicle(s)
2016 Deadpool 5.0
Upgrading the spark plugs is not a bad idea, I have recommended this to all my customers that have more than just an intake. NGK 6510 will serve you well, I'm also a huge fan of Denso ITV22 .
I'm confused... I have no reason to doubt any of you guys when you recommend these plugs, but based on autozone's and amazon's fitments, they aren't supposed to work on a 2015 Mustang Ecoboost.

Out of curiosity, how does one go about declaring these fit for the car when the normal means of checking fitments is suggesting otherwise?

(About to order my ITV22s regardless)
 

wmsky33

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2015
Threads
0
Messages
180
Reaction score
46
Location
Georgetown, TX
First Name
Bill
Vehicle(s)
2015 EB PP 6MT Competition Orange
I'm confused... I have no reason to doubt any of you guys when you recommend these plugs, but based on autozone's and amazon's fitments, they aren't supposed to work on a 2015 Mustang Ecoboost.

Out of curiosity, how does one go about declaring these fit for the car when the normal means of checking fitments is suggesting otherwise?

(About to order my ITV22s regardless)
2 reasons:

First, online spark plug databases suck. You'd think that since the 2015 EB Mustang is so popular and that it's been out for what, a year now, spark plug databases would have added it by now. But no, many brands of spark plugs have not been added. I've noticed this with other cars as well. A car usually has to be around for 2-3 years before the spark plug databases catch up.

Second, because neither the NGK 6510 or the Denso ITV22 is a replacement for the factory plug. When you do a search on any website for plugs for the 2015 EB Mustang, the equivalent of the factory plug would be the NGK 6509 and the Denso ITV20. Both the 6510 and ITV22 are 1 step colder than the factory plug and so won't show up as the right plug for the car.

The guys in this thread know what they're talking about, especially Adam from MAPerformance. If you do any reading on this forum, you will see that MAPerformance doesn't just blindly make mods to the EB Mustang. They test *everything*. Just look at the OP. If Adam says NGK 6510 and Denso ITV22, then they will work.

I personally am using ITV20TT, which is stock heat range, simply because I wanted to try the new Denso TT plugs and they don't yet make them any colder. If they made a Denso ITV22TT, I would use that instead.
Sponsored

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
 




Top