Sponsored

Sales 3rd qtr 2019

SVTSNAKE355

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
Aug 22, 2018
Threads
1
Messages
434
Reaction score
248
Location
chicago
First Name
hothands
Vehicle(s)
2014 GT500
Makes me ask: How did Chevy ever come up with Camaro?
The name never drew me in. Like what is a camaro?
The name camaro is just as stupid as the company it comes from:cwl::crackup:
Sponsored

 

ctandc72

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2017
Threads
44
Messages
1,610
Reaction score
1,072
Location
VA
Vehicle(s)
'19 GT 6 speed Base
Vehicle Showcase
1
The name camaro is just as stupid as the company it comes from:cwl::crackup:
No company is perfect. I give you the Mustang II. A gussied up Pinto. At least Chevrolet never stooped that low.
 

Houston Kid

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2017
Threads
167
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
2,252
Location
Houston, TX
Vehicle(s)
'22 GT500 HE CFTP, '18 WK2 ,'16 Audi A7
Well, say hello to my new $63K 707 hp grocery getter. Yep, $63K was the negotiated price. $11K off.
IMG_6621.webp
 

Houston Kid

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2017
Threads
167
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
2,252
Location
Houston, TX
Vehicle(s)
'22 GT500 HE CFTP, '18 WK2 ,'16 Audi A7
Guess I am moving onto the Hellcat forum until I trade it in on a 2022 GT500.
 

Sponsored

Houston Kid

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2017
Threads
167
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
2,252
Location
Houston, TX
Vehicle(s)
'22 GT500 HE CFTP, '18 WK2 ,'16 Audi A7
I will still poke around on here for sure. Good group on here.
 

Bald Menace

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Threads
20
Messages
468
Reaction score
254
Location
Oregon
First Name
Menace
Vehicle(s)
Mustang 2 king Cobra
Our tail lights are $1000/a piece. Headlights are slightly more.

There's nothing cheap on any of these cars, which is a large reason why insurance premiums are high.
true but my Challenger tail lights were giving me random issues within 3 weeks of buying the car and the dealership couldn't seem to ever duplicate the issue. all of the Mustangs I have had that were equipped with LED lights have been flawless so far.
 

ctandc72

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2017
Threads
44
Messages
1,610
Reaction score
1,072
Location
VA
Vehicle(s)
'19 GT 6 speed Base
Vehicle Showcase
1
Here's to stooping low. I got your Pinto, right here baby!

pinto1.JPG
pinto2.webp
pinto3.JPG
pinto4.webp
pinto5.JPG
You can put a healthy V8 in a Pinto too....just saying. The Mustang II has more in common with the Vega than the Camaro of that era.
I'm not brand blind - I mean loyal. Every manufacturer has had its issues. I personally didn't care for the Fox Bodies or other Mustangs. I've owned a '17 and currently own a '19 GT. Only other Mustangs I'd really want to own are 67-68 Fastback, 69 Fastback, 65-66 Fastback and occasionally I start looking at 71-72 Mustangs.

All personal preference of course, but 67-69 Camaros - especially RS cars with hideaway headlights are sharp cars. 2nd Gen F-Body's are great looking cars until safety regs started screwing with the front bumpers in '75....and even then the Tran Ams were sharp.

It's apples to oranges comparing new Camaros or Mustangs to classic versions. That being said - I'd love to build an early Maverick with a Coyote and a 6 speed.
 

Sponsored

HoosierDaddy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2016
Threads
263
Messages
4,564
Reaction score
8,962
Location
Winchestertonfieldville (ok, Scottsdale), AZ
First Name
Randy
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT Premium PP, 2023 Tesla Model 3 Performance, 1978 Trans Am WS6, etc.
Whaattt? Challenger out sold the Mustang.
It doesn't matter. Ford makes more off each Mustang sale than Fiat does off every Challenger. [/Camaro owner is spirit]
 

edco

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Threads
2
Messages
242
Reaction score
224
Location
St. Louis, MO
Vehicle(s)
2007GT & 2017V6_ great Steeda & AM mods
You can put a healthy V8 in a Pinto too....just saying. The Mustang II has more in common with the Vega than the Camaro of that era.
I'm not brand blind - I mean loyal. Every manufacturer has had its issues. I personally didn't care for the Fox Bodies or other Mustangs. I've owned a '17 and currently own a '19 GT. Only other Mustangs I'd really want to own are 67-68 Fastback, 69 Fastback, 65-66 Fastback and occasionally I start looking at 71-72 Mustangs.

All personal preference of course, but 67-69 Camaros - especially RS cars with hideaway headlights are sharp cars. 2nd Gen F-Body's are great looking cars until safety regs started screwing with the front bumpers in '75....and even then the Tran Ams were sharp.

It's apples to oranges comparing new Camaros or Mustangs to classic versions. That being said - I'd love to build an early Maverick with a Coyote and a 6 speed.
I am going to stay with Mustang II topic. Introduced in 1974 Ford sold 385,993 Mustang II in 1974. It had no major recalls. Ford used (unlike GM) virgin rolled steel and it had no corrosion history. In the last sales year, 1978, Mustang II sold 192,410 units. Ford put the 'healthy V8' in the Cobra II. Pictured is the T-Top King Cobra appearance package. It was built one year, 1978, and slightly under 4400 were made. The Cobra II had the Boss 302 engine that was in the 1970 Sport Roof Mustang and dozens of other fast Fords and Mustangs. Is 2800 pounds with a Boss 302 and Tremec 3550 5 speed MT stooping low? The Cobra II was the first Mustang to wear the 5.0 badge. As a response to the 1973 Arab oil embargo many Mustang II were bought with 4 and 6 cylinder engines. The Mustang II was built for the market that existed in it's day. The Mustang II always get's knocked because the 4 and 6 cylinder units were not up to the reputation Carol Shelby, Steve McQueen, Parnelli Jones, A J Foyt, Mario and a dozen other guys who raced them created. That does not make Stang II a bad car. People loved them and they were still running around this town into the 1990s. I bought a Chevy Van in 1975 in S California. By 1978 it had fender and rocker panel rust that just pissed me off. It never rains in San Diego. How did that happen? Knock the Mustang II as you and others may, by today's sales standards, it would take GM eight years of Camaro sales to equal Mustang II sales in just 1974. Forget about it!
 
Last edited:

SVTSNAKE355

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
Aug 22, 2018
Threads
1
Messages
434
Reaction score
248
Location
chicago
First Name
hothands
Vehicle(s)
2014 GT500
I am going to stay with Mustang II topic. Introduced in 1974 Ford sold 385,993 Mustang II in 1974. It had no major recalls. Ford used (unlike GM) virgin rolled steel and it had no corrosion history. In the last sales year, 1978, Mustang II sold 192,410 units. Ford put the 'healthy V8' in the Cobra II. Pictured is the T-Top King Cobra appearance package. It was built one year, 1978, and slightly under 4400 were made. The Cobra II had the Boss 302 engine that was in the 1970 Sport Roof Mustang and dozens of other fast Fords and Mustangs. Is 2800 pounds with a Boss 302 and Tremec 3550 5 speed MT stooping low? The Cobra II was the first Mustang to wear the 5.0 badge. As a response to the 1973 Arab oil embargo many Mustang II were bought with 4 and 6 cylinder engines. The Mustang II was built for the market that existed in it's day. The Mustang II always get's knocked because of the 4 and 6 cylinders units were not up to the reputation Carol Shelby, Steve McQueen, Parnelli Jones, A J Foyt, Mario and a dozen other guys who raced them created. That does not make Stang II a bad car. People loved them and they were still running around this town into the 1990s. I bought a Chevy Van in 1975 in S California. By 1978 it had fender and rocker panel rust that just pissed me off. It never rains in San Diego. How did that happen? Knock the Mustang II as you and others may, by today's sales standards, it would take GM eight years of Camaro sales to equal the units sold of Mustang II in 1974. Forget about it!
AND THAT'S THE BOTTOM LINE :crackup::cwl:
 

ctandc72

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2017
Threads
44
Messages
1,610
Reaction score
1,072
Location
VA
Vehicle(s)
'19 GT 6 speed Base
Vehicle Showcase
1
I am going to stay with Mustang II topic. Introduced in 1974 Ford sold 385,993 Mustang II in 1974. It had no major recalls. Ford used (unlike GM) virgin rolled steel and it had no corrosion history. In the last sales year, 1978, Mustang II sold 192,410 units. Ford put the 'healthy V8' in the Cobra II. Pictured is the T-Top King Cobra appearance package. It was built one year, 1978, and slightly under 4400 were made. The Cobra II had the Boss 302 engine that was in the 1970 Sport Roof Mustang and dozens of other fast Fords and Mustangs. Is 2800 pounds with a Boss 302 and Tremec 3550 5 speed MT stooping low? The Cobra II was the first Mustang to wear the 5.0 badge. As a response to the 1973 Arab oil embargo many Mustang II were bought with 4 and 6 cylinder engines. The Mustang II was built for the market that existed in it's day. The Mustang II always get's knocked because of the 4 and 6 cylinders units were not up to the reputation Carol Shelby, Steve McQueen, Parnelli Jones, A J Foyt, Mario and a dozen other guys who raced them created. That does not make Stang II a bad car. People loved them and they were still running around this town into the 1990s. I bought a Chevy Van in 1975 in S California. By 1978 it had fender and rocker panel rust that just pissed me off. It never rains in San Diego. How did that happen? Knock the Mustang II as you and others may, by today's sales standards, it would take GM eight years of Camaro sales to equal Mustang II sales in just 1974. Forget about it!
Like I said - styling is personal. But PLEASE - PLEASE don't call the King Cobra's anemic, EPA and CAFE (new for 1978) addled TWO barrel a "Boss 302". It wasn't. It had 8.4:1 compression ratio and churned out a monster 138HP. And it had a Borg Warner 4 speed.
Sponsored

 
 








Top