- Banned
- #46
The name camaro is just as stupid as the company it comes fromMakes me ask: How did Chevy ever come up with Camaro?
The name never drew me in. Like what is a camaro?


Sponsored
The name camaro is just as stupid as the company it comes fromMakes me ask: How did Chevy ever come up with Camaro?
The name never drew me in. Like what is a camaro?


No company is perfect. I give you the Mustang II. A gussied up Pinto. At least Chevrolet never stooped that low.The name camaro is just as stupid as the company it comes from![]()
Yeah, they did.................No company is perfect. I give you the Mustang II. A gussied up Pinto. At least Chevrolet never stooped that low.
Well if you do, we'll miss you. The Hellcat is awesome. Congrats.Guess I am moving onto the Hellcat forum until I trade it in on a 2022 GT500.
true but my Challenger tail lights were giving me random issues within 3 weeks of buying the car and the dealership couldn't seem to ever duplicate the issue. all of the Mustangs I have had that were equipped with LED lights have been flawless so far.Our tail lights are $1000/a piece. Headlights are slightly more.
There's nothing cheap on any of these cars, which is a large reason why insurance premiums are high.
Here's to stooping low. I got your Pinto, right here baby!No company is perfect. I give you the Mustang II. A gussied up Pinto. At least Chevrolet never stooped that low.
You can put a healthy V8 in a Pinto too....just saying. The Mustang II has more in common with the Vega than the Camaro of that era.Here's to stooping low. I got your Pinto, right here baby!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It doesn't matter. Ford makes more off each Mustang sale than Fiat does off every Challenger. [/Camaro owner is spirit]Whaattt? Challenger out sold the Mustang.
I am going to stay with Mustang II topic. Introduced in 1974 Ford sold 385,993 Mustang II in 1974. It had no major recalls. Ford used (unlike GM) virgin rolled steel and it had no corrosion history. In the last sales year, 1978, Mustang II sold 192,410 units. Ford put the 'healthy V8' in the Cobra II. Pictured is the T-Top King Cobra appearance package. It was built one year, 1978, and slightly under 4400 were made. The Cobra II had the Boss 302 engine that was in the 1970 Sport Roof Mustang and dozens of other fast Fords and Mustangs. Is 2800 pounds with a Boss 302 and Tremec 3550 5 speed MT stooping low? The Cobra II was the first Mustang to wear the 5.0 badge. As a response to the 1973 Arab oil embargo many Mustang II were bought with 4 and 6 cylinder engines. The Mustang II was built for the market that existed in it's day. The Mustang II always get's knocked because the 4 and 6 cylinder units were not up to the reputation Carol Shelby, Steve McQueen, Parnelli Jones, A J Foyt, Mario and a dozen other guys who raced them created. That does not make Stang II a bad car. People loved them and they were still running around this town into the 1990s. I bought a Chevy Van in 1975 in S California. By 1978 it had fender and rocker panel rust that just pissed me off. It never rains in San Diego. How did that happen? Knock the Mustang II as you and others may, by today's sales standards, it would take GM eight years of Camaro sales to equal Mustang II sales in just 1974. Forget about it!You can put a healthy V8 in a Pinto too....just saying. The Mustang II has more in common with the Vega than the Camaro of that era.
I'm not brand blind - I mean loyal. Every manufacturer has had its issues. I personally didn't care for the Fox Bodies or other Mustangs. I've owned a '17 and currently own a '19 GT. Only other Mustangs I'd really want to own are 67-68 Fastback, 69 Fastback, 65-66 Fastback and occasionally I start looking at 71-72 Mustangs.
All personal preference of course, but 67-69 Camaros - especially RS cars with hideaway headlights are sharp cars. 2nd Gen F-Body's are great looking cars until safety regs started screwing with the front bumpers in '75....and even then the Tran Ams were sharp.
It's apples to oranges comparing new Camaros or Mustangs to classic versions. That being said - I'd love to build an early Maverick with a Coyote and a 6 speed.
Low enough that they went BANKRUPTNo company is perfect. I give you the Mustang II. A gussied up Pinto. At least Chevrolet never stooped that low.


AND THAT'S THE BOTTOM LINEI am going to stay with Mustang II topic. Introduced in 1974 Ford sold 385,993 Mustang II in 1974. It had no major recalls. Ford used (unlike GM) virgin rolled steel and it had no corrosion history. In the last sales year, 1978, Mustang II sold 192,410 units. Ford put the 'healthy V8' in the Cobra II. Pictured is the T-Top King Cobra appearance package. It was built one year, 1978, and slightly under 4400 were made. The Cobra II had the Boss 302 engine that was in the 1970 Sport Roof Mustang and dozens of other fast Fords and Mustangs. Is 2800 pounds with a Boss 302 and Tremec 3550 5 speed MT stooping low? The Cobra II was the first Mustang to wear the 5.0 badge. As a response to the 1973 Arab oil embargo many Mustang II were bought with 4 and 6 cylinder engines. The Mustang II was built for the market that existed in it's day. The Mustang II always get's knocked because of the 4 and 6 cylinders units were not up to the reputation Carol Shelby, Steve McQueen, Parnelli Jones, A J Foyt, Mario and a dozen other guys who raced them created. That does not make Stang II a bad car. People loved them and they were still running around this town into the 1990s. I bought a Chevy Van in 1975 in S California. By 1978 it had fender and rocker panel rust that just pissed me off. It never rains in San Diego. How did that happen? Knock the Mustang II as you and others may, by today's sales standards, it would take GM eight years of Camaro sales to equal the units sold of Mustang II in 1974. Forget about it!


Like I said - styling is personal. But PLEASE - PLEASE don't call the King Cobra's anemic, EPA and CAFE (new for 1978) addled TWO barrel a "Boss 302". It wasn't. It had 8.4:1 compression ratio and churned out a monster 138HP. And it had a Borg Warner 4 speed.I am going to stay with Mustang II topic. Introduced in 1974 Ford sold 385,993 Mustang II in 1974. It had no major recalls. Ford used (unlike GM) virgin rolled steel and it had no corrosion history. In the last sales year, 1978, Mustang II sold 192,410 units. Ford put the 'healthy V8' in the Cobra II. Pictured is the T-Top King Cobra appearance package. It was built one year, 1978, and slightly under 4400 were made. The Cobra II had the Boss 302 engine that was in the 1970 Sport Roof Mustang and dozens of other fast Fords and Mustangs. Is 2800 pounds with a Boss 302 and Tremec 3550 5 speed MT stooping low? The Cobra II was the first Mustang to wear the 5.0 badge. As a response to the 1973 Arab oil embargo many Mustang II were bought with 4 and 6 cylinder engines. The Mustang II was built for the market that existed in it's day. The Mustang II always get's knocked because of the 4 and 6 cylinders units were not up to the reputation Carol Shelby, Steve McQueen, Parnelli Jones, A J Foyt, Mario and a dozen other guys who raced them created. That does not make Stang II a bad car. People loved them and they were still running around this town into the 1990s. I bought a Chevy Van in 1975 in S California. By 1978 it had fender and rocker panel rust that just pissed me off. It never rains in San Diego. How did that happen? Knock the Mustang II as you and others may, by today's sales standards, it would take GM eight years of Camaro sales to equal Mustang II sales in just 1974. Forget about it!