Sponsored

Repro Ecoboost

ypena02

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2015
Threads
27
Messages
789
Reaction score
203
Location
Massachusetts
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT
Sure, but seems really odd a deviation of more than 50hp, I woud expect to lose no more than 20 or 30hp in the worst of cases. 50hp is almost a 20% of the overall power, but ayway I understand this may be deemed as "normal".
What octane fuel are you using?
Sponsored

 
OP
OP

cpelo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2016
Threads
10
Messages
67
Reaction score
19
Location
españa
Vehicle(s)
mustang ecoboost
98 octane gasoline in Spain
 
OP
OP

cpelo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2016
Threads
10
Messages
67
Reaction score
19
Location
españa
Vehicle(s)
mustang ecoboost
I leave the graph of the first launched the car in stock and launched with the reprogramming of a tuner with map cast for them, as it did not taste much the results of the second launched , one of the reasons was the room temperature to that day in Madrid , next week take the car to another dyno to compare results.
[/IMG]
 

Juben

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Threads
35
Messages
2,519
Reaction score
809
Location
Chattanooga, TN
First Name
Justin
Vehicle(s)
2015 EcoBoost Mustang (AT) w/PP
graph-1.webp


So this is what Cobb claims for stock, stage1 (no hardware change I think), and stage 2 (intercooler change, intake change, more boost). Most important is horsepower and torque change instead of actual number. This is basically 98RON fuel.

265-->335hp with no hardware change seems like very big change.
What's interesting to me is that they seemed to have worked some kind of sorcery (kidding) to get the horsepower to continue to redline at a pretty linear rate without much decline, if any. The stock head is crap on these cars and you normally don't see one hold power out, even with a big turbo, after 5,500 rpms due to that factor. The Stage 2 graph actually looks pretty darn good.
 

Sponsored

arghx7

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
284
Reaction score
97
Location
cold
Vehicle(s)
50 years Ecoboost
DI heads (in general) are designed for tumble flow, not cylinder filling.

The stage 2 has less backpressure so the engine doesn't have to work so hard pumping exhaust out of the cylinder. Less backpressure means less residual gas. Less residual gas also reduces tendency to knock. Less intake restriction reduces compressor wheel speed & pressure ratio to make the turbo work more efficiently.
 
OP
OP

cpelo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2016
Threads
10
Messages
67
Reaction score
19
Location
españa
Vehicle(s)
mustang ecoboost
Hello, then the graph of the repro of my car which data are 330 hp 536 nm, you look good? which opinion do you have? a greeting
Sponsored

 
 








Top