ajsfirehawk
Well-Known Member
You nailed it with your screen name.
Sponsored
its not the first time a manufacturer has encrypted the ecu. i remember when first getting my S4, the Bosch ECU was encrypted and it took about a year and half before we could flash it from home. i see the mustang going down the same path. if man can encrypt it, man can break that encryption, it will just take some time. that being said i am happy with my S550 and not going to replace it.So, after all that, if you want a car you won't be able to significantly modify and you like the styling and you dig the incremental improvements, maybe paying $10k more for a base GT and $20k more for a "Darkhorse" with the cheezy badging is a smart move.
For most everyone else who's actually an "enthusiast" and wants the freedom of upgrading their car (either now or down the road) with way less limitations, the S550 seems to be the best platform for modifying your pony car.
You nailed it. IF the PCM is able to be cracked by someone other than a Ford approved vendor (Whipple, I’m sure Roush, Saleen and Shelby will have packages at some point too), you better believe Ford will know when it tries to communicate with the car. That’s one of the biggest issues I have with EV (besides the fact it’s being forced on the market when the infrastructure isn’t even ready for it, but that’s a whole other discussion). The manufacturers are connected to those cars 24/7/365 and know (or have the ability to know) what’s going on anytime they want.4) Tuning. This is a big deal. Yes, Ford will eventually offer canned packages from Whipple and possibly others. But it'll be very limited to what you see now from Roush (warrantable). Furthermore, until someone cracks the PCM, there will be no significant performance upgrades outside of what Ford allows (and charges you handsomely for). Lastly, EVEN IF they crack it, with all the mother ship, nanny state, remote updating and diagnostics, it remains to be seen whether an aftermarket tune would work without wonking the car out (or informing Ford). Basically, even if they crack it (which has YET to be accomplished for the DCT) it may still not be an option because of all the remote tentacles incorporated. It needs to communicate, to what extent remains to be seen.
As an aside - Not many Fuegos left!I have a Mach 1 on order and am torn between it and a '24 dark horse.
I like the modernized infotainment in the S650, but really wish they had managed to preserve the character of the mustang interior.
I think the biggest things the S650 has going for it are improved steering and handling, 4th gen coyote improvements, brembos all around, and updated technology.
Here in the US the Mustang was never considered a "Large car" Quite small to me.I was the opposite. Having seen the S650 I thought the S550 looks old all of a sudden, which of course it is! I think the new shape is quite colour sensitive, the interior more modern. Hopefully the finish and quality of the interior moves up to at least current Ford European standards. It's a very different market over here where the Mustang is a large GT car, not a sports car, so is fighting against high quality opposition.
I remember around 1986 a Fuego pulling up next to my brother on the highway and laughing at us. We were in a Mazda Rotary pickup, and the exhaust was a little loud. He then accelerated away. My brother wasn't going to take it and wound the Little Rotary up to 8,500 rpm in 4th gear hitting 125mph. The Little Fuego could only do about 90-95. We got the last laugh.As an aside - Not many Fuegos left!
21 in the UK of which 6 are turbos
Seen this idea a couple of times.its not the first time a manufacturer has encrypted the ecu. i remember when first getting my S4, the Bosch ECU was encrypted and it took about a year and half before we could flash it from home. i see the mustang going down the same path. if man can encrypt it, man can break that encryption, it will just take some time. that being said i am happy with my S550 and not going to replace it.
Nice bump for the GT (it’s 480hp for the standard dual exhaust, 486hp for the quad active exhaust). Depending on pricing, the DH seems a little underwhelming. It’s a 20-30hp increase over the Mach 1 but I was expecting closer to 515-525hp. I guess I shouldn’t complain too much since it’s still a V8 but DH was a bit underwhelming.Personally glad I ordered a s550 when I did. Not saying that the bump in horsepower isn't great, it just isn't worth the bump in price even if its $1k (to me)
Seeing these numbers and all other things considered, I'm happy with the Mach 1. The only thing that would get me to trade in is if they brought in some actual new features for the eventual refresh + facelift (like having a HUD, front parking camera, better interior materials overall, etc). Oh, and making that interior less of an eyesore.Nice bump for the GT (it’s 480hp for the standard dual exhaust, 486hp for the quad active exhaust). Depending on pricing, the DH seems a little underwhelming. It’s a 20-30hp increase over the Mach 1 but I was expecting closer to 515-525hp. I guess I shouldn’t complain too much since it’s still a V8 but DH was a bit underwhelming.
I agree, BuT if the interior sucks, as that future design has shown, makes me look elsewhere.I didn't want to wait like someone else said. Life is too short. I don't think the S650 looks any better. Looks are subjective anyway. I have no problem with the interior of my non premium car even. The new interior does not excite me. I didn't buy a Mustang for the interior anyway. The only thing that would make me want the new S650 is the added power. I can always trade in someday if I drive one and it feels that much faster.