Search results

at 1:06-1:10 it does not look to be very stable, or is that normal behavior ?

Maybe if I read in detail about these I would have my answer, but just curious about them 'permatizing' to the sidewall, seems many if not most tires now have patterned/textured sidewalls with very little smooth real estate...now take the old GoodYear Polyglas tires, those were smooth...

…or a coupler nut and shirt bolt + thread loc

Am I mistaken or is that set at 7 [seven] lbs ? it is on '7', it did not yet reach '10' and is not just below '20' where '17' would be found...

Well done…the air intake look offers a nice, functional appearance !

…or mask the two lenses including draping the rest of the vehicle with plastic tarps and carefully spray the lenses with semi-gloss/satin black paint (thoroughly cleaning them first) and then just don’t switch them on…I THINK it would take on a nice ‘phantom’ look!

is it possible that the oil level is below able to register BUT there is enough oil on the wall the diptube being transferred to the dipstick (which is not centered in the tube)? a long shot it but would fit the scenario.

what about ‘pop it out’, bondo it smooth, then wrap the vehicle, by no means what a purist would do but still a nice looking Mustang !

Thanks to this forum, this thread in particular, I had both lines replaced with the Steeda items at a couple hundred miles last year… …shame on Ford for not outfitting every vehicle at the factory with the upgrades!

dave2013m3, ice445 and bnightstar- thanks for your responses

I was trying to figure this out by myself but I have to ask…in several posts there is mention of performing a tune with the higher numeric gear upgrade, what is the tune? What is affected having done the tune? Thank you.

got it, thanks !

EgoBoost, are you saying that installing aftermarket higher numeric gears in today’s vehicles is justified? (I wasn’t sure how to take your statement)

ice445, shogun32 and NGOT8R- thanks for the input, 4.56 sounds tempting, I obviously would want a noticeable upgrade…Q: would this high(est) numeric rear end result in a ‘jerky’ reverse gear when, say, maneuvering (reverse) in a parallel-parking situation (being a manual and putting a clutch in...

I did misunderstand you, thanks for the clarification…right now it is something I am just starting to consider so I am not ready to act…thanks again.

Thanks, shogun, but I would probably just jump to the 4.09 if I acted on it.

Thanks for the response, it is the one modification I would seriously consider.

ice445 wrote: Personally, the sound and enjoyment of going through the gears makes the Mustang a keeper for me. ABSOLUTELY ! Question: I am the same way, city-driving the speed limit, shifting and enjoying the sound of recovering the RPMs [with a 2023 GT 3.55 rear end ] would a 3.73...

check out the AWE TOURING CAT BACK exhaust, their description sounds like it may be what you’re looking-for…

I think we need the option of a ‘thumbs down dislike’ button on this site, ‘liking’ obviously sends a message, while abstaining from liking does not !