phunk's Whipple GT

[mustang_guy]

This is the new guy at Lund, or this is Ken Bjonnes?

Its yolodouchebag guy from youtube. His name is Alejandro

Sponsored

 

[rainmaker]

Its yolodouchebag guy from youtube. His name is Alejandro

Just go with your Lund tune - you'll be happy. If you want something more aggressive then your getting, just tell them and get a revision. All things considered I would expect a Lund tune to be a little more conservative because he see's so many different combinations where Whipple can optimize for a more static configuration.

 

[evo8904]

This is the new guy at Lund, or this is Ken Bjonnes?

New guy, Ken opened his own shop in south FL. I just paid Ken for a remote tune. I ended up going with Ken because my 1000cc injectors are already installed. If they weren't, I would have gone whipple. I need jmeo power on 93 lol.

 

[evo8904]

Just go with your Lund tune - you'll be happy. If you want something more aggressive then your getting, just tell them and get a revision. All things considered I would expect a Lund tune to be a little more conservative because he see's so many different combinations where Whipple can optimize for a more static configuration.

Here are my logs, I have asked for a more aggressive tune. I would have been happy with 18-19 degrees of timing and a 11.5:1 A/F. That would be similar to whipple's tune on 93 with a 3.625 pulley. Yet, I didn't get that. The first pic is the start of my log and the second is at the end of a 3rd WOT pull. For a 93 tune comparison check this thread. http://www.mustang6g.com/forums/showthread.php?t=43888

I don't doubt that you will hit 800rwhp on e85 but that's only 40rwhp than jmeo and gsxr1300. I think that you can get higher depending on the pulley that you run. I would probably go with the 3.5 pulley on e85.

[/URL][/IMG]

[/URL][/IMG]

 

[Jmeo]

And a can of Octanium would probably even us up

 

[evo8904]

And a can of Octanium would probably even us up

I tried octanium and with the Lund tune it barely changed the A/F and timing remained the same. But, my meth/water injection made my timing advance to 17.5 and actually leaned out my A/F more than octanium. I'll be doing dyno test soon. My IATs were hotter when I tried the meth/water because it was a much hotter day. Tampa sucks

 

[Jmeo]

Octanium was confirmed to work great with Whipple tune by Dustin himself [emoji106]

 

[evo8904]

Octanium was confirmed to work great with Whipple tune by Dustin himself [emoji106]

Yeah, it is Whipple's tune. Their tune will adjust depending on octane. It is amazing.

 

[phunk]

Whipple got back to me and said no go on the injector swap discount, so I am going to move along with my ID1000s which means Lund and/or Ken Bjonnes.

Since my Lund is already all paid for, I may as well see where it takes me before spending any more.

 

[evo8904]

Whipple got back to me and said no go on the injector swap discount, so I am going to move along with my ID1000s which means Lund and/or Ken Bjonnes.

Since my Lund is already all paid for, I may as well see where it takes me before spending any more.

Make him push it! A guy that I know has just a torco + 93 tune from Lund. His timing is 20.5 degrees and A/F 11.6:1

 

[Jmeo]

Well, head down and onward you go [emoji106] Looking forward to your results.

 

[Stage_3]

Its yolodouchebag guy from youtube. His name is Alejandro

Dude is a riot.

 

[rainmaker]

Here are my logs, I have asked for a more aggressive tune. I would have been happy with 18-19 degrees of timing and a 11.5:1 A/F. That would be similar to whipple's tune on 93 with a 3.625 pulley. Yet, I didn't get that. The first pic is the start of my log and the second is at the end of a 3rd WOT pull. For a 93 tune comparison check this thread. http://www.mustang6g.com/forums/showthread.php?t=43888

I don't doubt that you will hit 800rwhp on e85 but that's only 40rwhp than jmeo and gsxr1300. I think that you can get higher depending on the pulley that you run. I would probably go with the 3.5 pulley on e85.

[/URL][/IMG]

[/URL][/IMG]

I see almost 20* on my Lund tune (19.75) with negative knock. I don't recall my exact a/f, but I'll take a look if you're interested.

 

[evo8904]

I see almost 20* on my Lund tune (19.75) with negative knock. I don't recall my exact a/f, but I'll take a look if you're interested.

With negative knock, you will see 22* on most others with 93oct. Then look at the A/F and compare it to the link that I provided. I will be doing a comparison soon.

 

[phunk]

I did some logging and updating with Lund today. Unfortunately we did not get to finish the 93 octane tuning before the weekend so I wont be able to enjoy the car in the beautiful weather. Guess I better get the motorcycle cleaned up!

I am cleared to go do some WOT logs up to 5500rpm. I have the 3.5" pulley on at the moment (and it sounds glorious) but Lund wants me to swap back to the 3.625" for now until everything is perfect. So I will put the 3.625" back on and do a couple WOT logs. It will be difficult for me to compare the power having to cut the engine speed short but its the best I can do until next week.

I am just anxious to get on the E85!!!

Sponsored