apexclipper
Well-Known Member
A '14 Z28 won't feel like a Cadillac. :shocked:This is very true. Even after driving my mildly modified 2011 GT, jumping in a stock '13-14 track pack GT feels like a Cadillac.
Sponsored
A '14 Z28 won't feel like a Cadillac. :shocked:This is very true. Even after driving my mildly modified 2011 GT, jumping in a stock '13-14 track pack GT feels like a Cadillac.
At the same time, we were most aware that this new chassis also felt remarkably supple for a car with a performance-oriented suspension setup. It turns out that the engineers have dialed in twice as much anti-dive, anti-lift, and anti-squat into the suspension geometry as before to make the Mustang chassis more stable under acceleration and braking. As a result, there’s no need to use especially stiff spring rates to prop up the chassis, and the result seems to be a very composed, modern sort of handling dynamic from the car. The old, familiar Mustang hop and shudder didn’t seem to be in evidence.
Read more:*http://www.automobilemag.com/review...ustang-2-3-ecoboost-first-ride/#ixzz32Oy15nrj
That's about what I'd expect for a widely available, regular production option suspension.From the Automobile Magazine Ride Along Review...
http://www.automobilemag.com/reviews/driven/1405-2015-ford-mustang-2-3-ecoboost-first-ride/
I never drove one.How do the 12-13 Boss 302's ride? If the new GT with the PP is faster around the same track as those 302's, I bet ride quality might be similar even with the IRS factored in?
Wonder if that is an accurate statement
Performance package cars sit a little lower and the wheel wells are pretty much stuffed full of wheel and tire:Have they listed if the ride hight will be slightly lower then the non PP version.
From looking at a lot of the pics, it seams to be slightly less wheel gap, even with the 19" wheels, compared to 20"
Maybe they shortened the springs a small amount, like 10 - 15mm :shrug: