Sponsored

Own up...

Who's at fault...?

  • Mustang 100%

    Votes: 15 19.0%
  • Shitbox 100%

    Votes: 13 16.5%
  • 50/50

    Votes: 25 31.6%
  • Mustang 75/25%

    Votes: 8 10.1%
  • Shitbox 75/25%

    Votes: 18 22.8%

  • Total voters
    79
OP
OP
Centurion07

Centurion07

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2015
Threads
45
Messages
3,073
Reaction score
921
Location
Hampshire, UK
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT
A parade lap would just annoy me sorry, if I am on a track I wanna put my foot down not drive around at 30mph.
Yep. Did a parade lap of Spa last year on the Luxembourg meet. FIFTEEN MINUTES!! :doh:

Evening session of Donnington would be cool though.



i hate driving slow on tracks :lol:
I didn't think there were any other options with an Ecoboost...? :D

*controversial*
Sponsored

 

Nookie

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 7, 2016
Threads
9
Messages
785
Reaction score
264
Location
Jersey, Channel Islands
First Name
Adrian
Vehicle(s)
Mustang 5.0 GT
The more I watch the video the more inclined I am to swing from my original 50/50 vote to it being 80% the shitbox drivers fault... with the motorcyclist now being complicit!

Thankfully the Mustang looks like it 'was' an Ecobubble (isn't that also a washing machine), as had it been a GT it would have been going much faster and the consequences much worse :D !
 

Tom C

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Threads
11
Messages
158
Reaction score
118
Location
Rockaway NJ
First Name
Tom
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT Convertible
I hope some of you guys are joking about the biker. He plays absolutely no part in this equation. The driver of a turning car is not absolved one iota even if someone waves him on. He still has the greater duty to proceed only when traffic is clear.

Sorry...most of the liability (greater than 50%) rests with the silver car, but the Mustang driver owns a significant portion of fault as well.
 

Sponsored

Nookie

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 7, 2016
Threads
9
Messages
785
Reaction score
264
Location
Jersey, Channel Islands
First Name
Adrian
Vehicle(s)
Mustang 5.0 GT
I hope some of you guys are joking about the biker.
I think I read somewhere that he's being shot at dawn tomorrow :D:D:D !

(Edit: That is a joke just in case there's any over-sensitive readers out there) !
 

Tom C

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Threads
11
Messages
158
Reaction score
118
Location
Rockaway NJ
First Name
Tom
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT Convertible
We have a saying over here Tom; "courtesy causes confusion".

Unfortunately not nearly enough people know that.
I agree....happens here on the left side of the pond too. But that concept doesn't override common sense road and driving safety rules regardless of continent.

The only thing that one should assume when driving is that someone else is going to do something really stupid. Many accidents for the most part are avoided not by evasive maneuvers but by anticipating that there might be one and anticipating accordingly.
 

Manders Mustang

The Boss
Joined
Dec 3, 2015
Threads
96
Messages
12,999
Reaction score
2,441
Location
Birmingham - United Kingdom
First Name
Steve
Vehicle(s)
2016 Race Red Ecoboost
Vehicle Showcase
1
I didn't think there were any other options with an Ecoboost...? :D

*controversial*
True we're either super fast or not moving, unlike the 5.slows ;)!
 

slowhand99

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 3, 2015
Threads
61
Messages
3,141
Reaction score
944
Location
Surrey, England
First Name
Ben
Vehicle(s)
Mustang GT Vert Race Red ord 26/03/15 del 24/03/16
I like the idea that a biker cancelled his order due to the NCAP rating. :thumbsup:
 

Sponsored

goldengooner

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2016
Threads
64
Messages
2,049
Reaction score
353
Location
London UK
First Name
Larry
Vehicle(s)
Shadow Black 2016 California Special Convertible
It's funny
on here and on the MOCOGB and SMUK there are so many different opinions, it's rather worrying
I still feel that the Stang is mostly at fault
The Biker stopped allowing the car to start to turn, and suddenly the Stang who can't see a moving car into his lane, slams right into him
I mean the bike was stopped, so the car just sits there?
One thing we don't know is what the Stang was doing before the crash, if you watch from the start the 1st set of lights with the bike beside the Stang, then the bike roars off, did the Stang see the bike stopped and decide to speed up to overtake the Bike?
was the Stang chasing the bike?
lots of questions with few answers
 
Last edited:

stevec

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Threads
63
Messages
2,772
Reaction score
1,199
Location
hastings
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT!!
I think there was quite a time between the two sets of lights as you can see the video was clipped.
I think we all agree that the Mustang driver was driving like a nob. but fault in the law is sometimes a different beast. The speed IS hard to prove so then you are just left with a car pulling across in front of another car!
I guess we will never know how this goes but I would love to know.
 
OP
OP
Centurion07

Centurion07

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2015
Threads
45
Messages
3,073
Reaction score
921
Location
Hampshire, UK
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT
suddenly the Stang who can't see a moving car into his lane, slams right into him
Take a minute to think about that...

The Mustang can't see a car, that was stationary one second and then suddenly starts to move INTO HIS LANE the next, versus the shitbox unable to see the Mustang, already established on his own side of the road, not deviating from what he was doing 1/3/10 seconds ago, yet that's the Mustang's fault for not pre-empting an idiot pulling out in front of him? :crazy:

I mean the bike was stopped, so the car just sits there?
If it means not having an accident OF COURSE IT BLOODY DOES!

The number one, overriding factor, above ALL else when driving, is DON'T CRASH!! You are literally saying it's ok to have an accident if the other car was going too fast.

Again, take a second to think about it. Shitbox is waiting to cross TWO lanes of oncoming traffic, they see the bike practically stop (Dr Grabster has already covered how stupid THAT was), and instead of taking an extra second or two to check for any other approaching traffic, blindly pulls across anyway.

As I said, they either misjudged the speed of the Mustang which means they didn't take a good enough look in the first place, or they didn't see it at all. Neither of those scenarios is a lesser evil than the Mustang's perceived excessive speed.

How are either of those options less dangerous than the Mustang maintaining his speed and course along an unbroken lane?

As Tom pointed out, the shitbox has had to cross what is essentially a centre line dividing the two carriageways in order to cause this collision. The Mustang did nothing.

The Mustang's speed is largely irrelevant because the shitbox has proven they either misjudged his speed or didn't see him at all. That means had the Mustang been going slower, the shitbox would still have misjudged his speed or not seen him at all. Result? Collision would still have occured but with slightly less damage.

It's downright scary, albeit not unexpected, that almost 20% of people think this is 100% the Mustang's fault. :lol:
 

slowhand99

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 3, 2015
Threads
61
Messages
3,141
Reaction score
944
Location
Surrey, England
First Name
Ben
Vehicle(s)
Mustang GT Vert Race Red ord 26/03/15 del 24/03/16
It's impossible to prove the Mustang's speed and the limit is at least 40 as there is a 30 sign for the turn-off. Turning across oncoming traffic gets you a due care and attention conviction (especially with a copper already on site). The 'shitbox' driver is driving on learned behaviour at that junction probably and may not have clocked that the lights were out. Other traffic (bike) stops; he goes. It's either the biker, the shit box or [MENTION=20131]Manders Mustang[/MENTION] at fault (just a hunch) but definitely not the Mustang. The fact that he could driven more defensively doesn't hand him the blame.
Sponsored

 
 








Top