GTX
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2021
- Threads
- 1
- Messages
- 67
- Reaction score
- 88
- Location
- Mid Atlantic
- First Name
- Ian
- Vehicle(s)
- 2017 GT350
I think it really comes down to how you intend to use the car.Learn to read...first step. As I said already I drove the damned thing. this post is the closest to explaining anything at all but still does address handling.
You absolutely can upgrade the brakes on a GT, even if it is aftermarket, which has been my point.
Adding a supercharger totally makes up for the weight with the power or they wouldnt do it on the GT500...right?
The WEIGHT difference between a GT and a GT350 is 55 pounds, so I am pretty sure that is not making or breaking your day...55 pounds....that is a half tank of gas....or a chubby guy vs a skinny guy. It is around 1% of the weight of the vehicle!!!
Stock to stock the difference in the 1/4 mile is .3 seconds BEFORE you supercharge the GT.
The newer version of the Getrag has not been a huge problem for most and even if it were, is it worth 10K more?
so that one makes no sense to me. But you obviously feel like a tough guy and feel like you have adequately pushed me around and are a know it all, so have a nice day. I will post where I see fit and if you don't like it, block me.
There is a warranty for the Roush/FP supercharger and while your trans wonât be as good as the GT350âs, it should be alright. I have no idea if they are more stout and reliable or still having issues which an S/C would only exacerbate. An S/C GT would be great for a street car or drag car and as you mention 1/4 mile times, this could be an ideal setup for yourself.
If you intend to do HPDEs you will want the N/A motor and factory equipped coolers found on the GT350/GT350R. That S/Ced GT you highlight will be heat soaking or you will be dropping a lot of time and money on fitting or relocating things in the engine bay to make room for the necessary coolers. Also, this will add a lot of weight on the front which isnât ideal.
I have read reviews where some folks who respect the GT500, but donât like the driving dynamics, how that 400+ lbs it has on the GT350, impacts the driving experience and prefer the NA motor. Also, you cannot argue that the GT350 sound is just special. Similar to the Porsche GT3 RS vs GT2 RS.
Brakes and other items you have referenced would be then not covered by the warranty you desire.
I think a lot of it is also personal preference. The old Boss 302 matched the e92 M3, but was described as a blunt instrument vs a scalpel. Both accomplished the same lap times, but went about it differently. I think that is what youâre running up against here. Not right or wrong, just different.
I could S/C or TT my GT350, but I value the simplicity of the NA motor and being able to run full sessions without overheating or dealing with other complications. I am focusing on suspension, weight reduction, and aero.
Another couple factors are aero and Recaros, although to your point, that is rather easily added.
We could get into value and depreciation of a modified GT vs a stock Shelby and while part of some folksâ decision making process, is outside the scope of this conversation. Something to be cognizant of when speaking with some GT350 owners though.
Hopefully this gives you some insight as to why folks may choose an older Shelby GT350 over a newer S/C GT. I will say an S/C GT never entered my thought process as it didnât meet the goals I have for the car and wasnât âspecialâ to me.
Sponsored