EcoVert
Well-Known Member
MACHEscape
I don't know what kind of glasses you're wearing or what kind of drugs you're taking but those two cars look nothing alike except for the white paint job.
Sponsored
MACHEscape
Yes, it could have been worse. But being better than 'worse' doesn't make it good. Just "less bad".Just think of this If Ford hadn't let us know a head of time that the Mach E was going to be called the Mach 1 the name of this EV would have been the Mustang Mach 1 !!!
both likely fine automobiles. NIETHER one has anything remotely close to what is deserving of being called a MUSTANG. For that matter , nothing does, other than a 2dr coupe/fastback
I don't know what kind of glasses you're wearing or what kind of drugs you're taking but those two cars look nothing alike except for the white paint job.
I think you're confusing my original comment in Post 1677 with my acceptance of the Mach E labled as a "Mustang". For the record, I'm not OK with that and you would see that if you've read my posts about the subject.Maybe, maybe not. A good experience with, say, an F150 or some other of Ford's SUVs would likely provide a measure of balance, in which case any name other than Mustang would be better.
Norm
Let me try again.I think you're confusing my original comment in Post 1677 with my acceptance of the Mach E labled as a "Mustang". For the record, I'm not OK with that and you would see that if you've read my posts about the subject.
Who knows WTF Ford is really thinking, all I'm saying is Ford could have also had that in the back of their heads when coming up with a name. If you don't thinks so, then fine with me. It doesn't matter, because it is what it is now.Let me try again.
I think it's a stretch for a Mustang ponycar owner to buy a 'Mustang' SUV for his wife because the name 'Mustang has anything to do with it. He'll buy an 'E' because he's happy enough with his EB/GT/etc., to put the Ford store on his list and buy the 'E' because it fits his needs. Not because the 'E' is making any claim to the 'Mustang' name.
Norm
There is no way this car will fail. There are so many "tree huggers" out there and a lot in California that they will buy them as fast as they come off the line. Those people would never buy a Mustang until now.The car is going to fail. And strictly because of the name. Anyone who thinks otherwise head over to the social media platforms and look at the responses of the PUBLIC, not us mustang die hards. I give it a two year run before it’s done/name changed. I still can’t believe Ford willingly shot themselves in the foot (actually nearly the face) with this obsurd business decision. IF by some chance it continues on, for years (puke coming up through my mouth as I type that) , then I as well as many others are likely to have purchased their last new mustang.
Not to mention that half of the production is going to Europe.There is no way this car will fail. There are so many "tree huggers" out there and a lot in California that they will buy them as fast as they come off the line. Those people would never buy a Mustang until now.
Our Mach E will sit next to my GT in our garage. And wife and I have both owned various Mustangs over the years.There is no way this car will fail. There are so many "tree huggers" out there and a lot in California that they will buy them as fast as they come off the line. Those people would never buy a Mustang until now.
And I hope they both treat you well for a long long time.Our Mach E will sit next to my GT in our garage. And wife and I have both owned various Mustangs over the years.
Signed - "Proud Tree Hugger"
I'm sure somebody ran that idea up the flagpole as yet another reason for Ford to do what it did. What I don't think is that for the purpose of marketing an SUV there's any more value in 'Mustang loyalty' than there already is in 'Ford loyalty'.Who knows WTF Ford is really thinking, all I'm saying is Ford could have also had that in the back of their heads when coming up with a name.