WindveilNJ
Well-Known Member
If you eat a vegan are you still a vegetarian?That's a laugh...ChefBorOzzy is unbiased? Sure, and Crocodiles are vegan.
Sponsored
If you eat a vegan are you still a vegetarian?That's a laugh...ChefBorOzzy is unbiased? Sure, and Crocodiles are vegan.
I think it makes you a hero with a stomach ache.If you eat a vegan are you still a vegetarian?
What is stupid about that argument playing out is people should be listening to the guys who don't own one because they are in the majority who DIDN'T buy the damn car. If they are on an enthusiast forum and haven't bought the car then their reason matters.They're becoming increasingly sensitive over there..some of the diehards now are trying to shut up anyone talking about the price (because..well..it's the primary reason the Camaro isn't selling as well) and want to create "non-owner" sections and not allow "non-owners" to comment in anything else.
Funny how people don't constantly complain about the Mustang's price...mostly because it's not out of line.
From a manufactures stand point they dont care about resales value, all they care is how many sales they got. its not their job worried about a resales that already out of their hands. Investor of that corperation can careless about resales. Good Manufactor do care about their products that they produces.I am by no means a fan of the 6g Camaro, but I want to set one thing straight. A lot of people have been saying that GM is selling fewer cars to rental companies because they lost contracts with said rental companies or simply that the rental companies don't want the 6g Camaro.
This isn't true and companies in fact do choose to sell fewer cars to rental companies at times. This has a lot to do with resale value. Rental cars get beat up real fast aND are usually resold within 12-18 months. Say company X sold 100,000 of a certain model car. If 25,000 of those cars went to rental companies, the resale value for the car would be terrible, because 25% of them are beat up and sold cheap.
GM, and all OEM's treat this like a teeter totter and try to find the best balance of total sales/revenue vs. hurting resale value and thus compromising potential sales down the road.
That's really not true at all. Resale value is a huge part of how people perceive value and quality. The automakers are very aware of this. That said, they're not going to artificially produce significantly less or more to drive resale value. Afterall, the Toyota Camry has pretty darn good resale value, and they make ~300k of them a year.From a manufactures stand point they dont care about resales value, all they care is how many sales they got. its not their job worried about a resales that already out of their hands. Investor of that corperation can careless about resales. Good Manufactor do care about their products that they produces.
Resale value is in the hand of the consumers, and it takes years to built that reputation, Toyota Camry are know for reliability, that is why they can sale 300k per year and still hold value. You can't just reduced your production and expect to have resale value.That's really not true at all. Resale value is a huge part of how people perceive value and quality. The automakers are very aware of this. That said, they're not going to artificially produce significantly less or more to drive resale value. Afterall, the Toyota Camry has pretty darn good resale value, and they make ~300k of them a year.
That's EasyNow the question should be what make GM vehicles a good resale value?
That is incorrect...I am by no means a fan of the 6g Camaro, but I want to set one thing straight. A lot of people have been saying that GM is selling fewer cars to rental companies because they lost contracts with said rental companies or simply that the rental companies don't want the 6g Camaro.
This isn't true and companies in fact do choose to sell fewer cars to rental companies at times. This has a lot to do with resale value. Rental cars get beat up real fast aND are usually resold within 12-18 months. Say company X sold 100,000 of a certain model car. If 25,000 of those cars went to rental companies, the resale value for the car would be terrible, because 25% of them are beat up and sold cheap.
GM, and all OEM's treat this like a teeter totter and try to find the best balance of total sales/revenue vs. hurting resale value and thus compromising potential sales down the road.
I...don't think anyone here said that, sir.
He literally states that GM lost their contracts to sell to rental companies.As far as the "We don't do Rentals or Fleet".
A better way of saying that is...
We lost our contracts to sell wholesale product to commercial rental companies. It looks like a smart business move, although, I'm not sure how less sales is good...
Next they boast higher profit per sale, yet most Camaro fans dismiss that those profits are made up on THEIR retail purchase. In other words, THEY make up for the lost profit ;)
GM isn't selling Fleet/Rental because they no longer have a contract to do so :lol:
Who here ever said that? Quote?
He flat out says that they lost contracts.As far as the "We don't do Rentals or Fleet".
A better way of saying that is...
We lost our contracts to sell wholesale product to commercial rental companies. It looks like a smart business move, although, I'm not sure how less sales is good...
Next they boast higher profit per sale, yet most Camaro fans dismiss that those profits are made up on THEIR retail purchase. In other words, THEY make up for the lost profit ;)
GM isn't selling Fleet/Rental because they no longer have a contract to do so :lol:
That's pretty much why I haven't owned a GM product in over a decade....That's Easy
1) Reliability....... Er no
2) Quality .......:headbonk:
3) Safety .......:lol:
4) Motor Trend loves them :love:
Actually, I can't think of a decent reason to buy a new GM product let alone a used one, The sales numbers seem to indicate that the vast majority of car buyers agree.
Me either, since owning a 1984 Chevy Cavilier:frusty:That's pretty much why I haven't owned a GM product in over a decade....
Um... never had really.He flat out says that they lost contracts.
If he bought the fox he'd still be driving it. Or at the very least turned it into a race car by now.Me either, since owning a 1984 Chevy Cavilier:frusty:
Was in my first job and it was my first new car. Funny part was being in training with a guy from Kansas trying to decide between a fox body 5.0 and a Cadillac Cimeron (Cavalier with mid-80's bling). I warned him about quality and he bought it anyway. Wrote me a year later - shoulda bought the fox!