Norm Peterson
corner barstool sitter
IOW, pretty much where the PP could have been over three years ago. Perhaps with MPSS tires rather than PSC2's.Laundry List:
- PP2
- Diff cooler
Norm
Sponsored
IOW, pretty much where the PP could have been over three years ago. Perhaps with MPSS tires rather than PSC2's.Laundry List:
- PP2
- Diff cooler
If you look at engine specific output, you'll see the Camaro has 80hp/80lb-ft per liter, versus the Mustang's 92hp/84lb-ft....what I don't understand is why the Mustangs torque is so poor when compared to the Camaros. Even with FI and/or mod's the torque figures are well behind that of the Camaro.
Was wondering when that would come up. Look at the engine sizes of the competition compared to their power output and I think you’ll see the Mustang does quite well with the smaller displacement. 5.7, 6.4, 6.2 etc. 6.2 Camaro makes 455 HP, 5.7 Challenger makes 375, 6.4 Challenger makes 485 HP. Granted yes we are a litttle down on torque in comparison, but we also are working with a smaller displacement motor. 5.0 still makes 435, 460 or 480 HP depending on year/model and our 5.2 liter makes 562. I’ll stick with what Ford is offering, thanks.If you look at engine specific output, you'll see the Camaro has 80hp/80lb-ft per liter, versus the Mustang's 92hp/84lb-ft.
Now which engine do you think is down on horsepower and torque?
Or, you could just buy PP2 for yourself and leave PP1 for the people it's meant for, the people who want a little bit of extra performance without severely sacrificing ride quality, tire maintenance, and driveability. This really isn't a difficult concept, all the packages are positioned and priced exactly how they should be. That's why Chevy is aiming to add a base level V8 Camaro.IOW, pretty much where the PP could have been over three years ago. Perhaps with MPSS tires rather than PSC2's
Whoops! I forgot the Camaro lt1 was 6.2 liters now. That means the specific output is only 73hp/73lb-ft per liter. What a boat anchor!Was wondering when that would come up. Look at the engine sizes of the competition compared to their power output and I think you’ll see the Mustang does quite well with the smaller displacement. 5.7, 6.4, 6.2 etc. 6.2 Camaro makes 455 HP, 5.7 Challenger makes 375, 6.4 Challenger makes 485 HP. Granted yes we are a litttle down on torque in comparison, but we also are working with a smaller displacement motor. 5.0 still makes 435, 460 or 480 HP depending on year/model and our 5.2 liter makes 562. I’ll stick with what Ford is offering, thanks.
Idk, I manage to have plenty of fun in my na '92 5.0I think some of the people complaining about the lack of power must never have owned an older 5.0. Before I put a Kenne Bell on my 95, it was rated at 215/285.
Absolutely you can, my 88 was mostly stock except for exhaust and I loved it. You and I aren’t the ones questioning the current gens perceived lack of power though.Idk, I manage to have plenty of fun in my na '92 5.0![]()
True that! I can't wait to get my hands on my PP2! Good thing it comes with all those traction nannies:lol:Absolutely you can, my 88 was mostly stock except for exhaust and I loved it. You and I aren’t the ones questioning the current gens perceived lack of power though.
Not many though the 1LE is a supercar fyiIf you get a used GT350 you can be close to the cost of a new GT, depending on options. You're right that an R is expensive. It's more than I wanted to spend. The GT350 is a blast on the streets and the track. I think it would be a better deal than doing a lot of modifications to a GT because you have to have the faster vehicle.
I try to not worry about the competition because there's always going to be someone faster. Just get what you like and have fun. If you buy the 1LE there are still going to be faster vehicles at the track.
Haven’t seen that anywhere yet. 1LEs are always compared head to head to Mustang GTs not the Ford GT which is undeniably a supercar. Maybe I missed something somewhere.Not many though the 1LE is a supercar fyi
Camaro6g.comHaven’t seen that anywhere yet. 1LEs are always compared head to head to Mustang GTs not the Ford GT which is undeniably a supercar. Maybe I missed something somewhere.