Sponsored

How to take a Picture of a car...

w3rkn

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Threads
21
Messages
3,078
Reaction score
755
Location
Detroit
Vehicle(s)
bmw 135is(sold)
Incredible to see so many pics, but so many non-standard photos.



A little help.

First & foremost if you have access to a car and are taking pictures, the profile shot is the quintessential shot.. odd that in all these photo threads you can find a single real profile shot.


Taken from approx. 20' back, and the lens has to be slightly below the roofline... (sun to your back)... shoot away..

As, if you yourself were sitting in a car and took a profile of another.. Would be nice to see profile shots of each color, so we can have a library to share on other sites, etc.

Just sayin...
Sponsored

 

Stangnut

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2013
Threads
43
Messages
1,464
Reaction score
355
Location
S.E. Alabama
First Name
Jason
Vehicle(s)
2019 Bullitt BHG
I strongly disagree with keeping the lens slightly below the roofline. While it can make for an interesting shot, it is WAY overused. If I want to see what a car looks like, the shots I want to see the most of are from the same angle as if I were standing there looking at it in person.
 

908ssp

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 27, 2014
Threads
25
Messages
1,400
Reaction score
319
Location
Michigan
First Name
Alex
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT/PP white
Incredible to see so many pics, but so many non-standard photos.



A little help.

First & foremost if you have access to a car and are taking pictures, the profile shot is the quintessential shot.. odd that in all these photo threads you can find a single real profile shot.


Taken from approx. 20' back, and the lens has to be slightly below the roofline... (sun to your back)... shoot away..

As, if you yourself were sitting in a car and took a profile of another.. Would be nice to see profile shots of each color, so we can have a library to share on other sites, etc.

Just sayin...
I agree. you can tell more from a shot taken lower than standing. Unfortunately most shots are taken in a crowd so you can't get back without someone being in the way. Really tired of the wide angle close ups they look horrible. Overcast is better than bright sun or partially cloudy. Less reflective crap to mess up the paint. Shooting with a lens in the 50mm to 100mm [35mm relative] range gives a more normal perspective. Wide angles distort making the middle larger and the ends smaller and longer lens foreshorten bringing the back and front closer together.
 

JoeDogInKC

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Threads
18
Messages
1,994
Reaction score
28
Location
Kansas City, MO
First Name
Joe
Vehicle(s)
Triple Yellow 2015 GT Premium w/PP
Just say no to overexposures.
 

Fox9350

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Threads
21
Messages
947
Reaction score
28
Location
Boston, MA area
Vehicle(s)
1993 5.0 GT (former car)
Just a few of the 'rules' and tricks I use:






Good pics, but these two drive me nuts. The front wheels should be turned so that the viewer of the photo can see the wheel, not the tire. People do this a lot and it looks goofy.

I read another suggestion once that cars are meant to be on the road, so as a general rule, pics of a car sitting on grass (unless its a car show in a field or something) are off as well.
 

Sponsored

fionic

spaghettios and cheerios
Joined
Jun 8, 2014
Threads
9
Messages
3,181
Reaction score
616
Location
IL
Vehicle(s)
15 GT PP
I actually hate car photos that use the 'rule of thirds'. You're not filming a motion picture.

I suppose for 'artistic' photos, that works. But, for photos of a car that actually shows details, why not include more car than air in the picture?
 

Fenderaddict2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Threads
27
Messages
844
Reaction score
4
Location
Oakville
Website
www.fastmyles.com
First Name
Stephen
Vehicle(s)
2012 Mustang Boss 302
I actually hate car photos that use the 'rule of thirds'. You're not filming a motion picture.

I suppose for 'artistic' photos, that works. But, for photos of a car that actually shows details, why not include more car than air in the picture?

Too true. The thirds rule is great for a screensaver. But what we want is details and full walk around views right now.
 

OppoLock

RWD Addict
Joined
Apr 21, 2014
Threads
43
Messages
3,098
Reaction score
870
Location
St. Petersburg, FL
First Name
Sean
Vehicle(s)
'15 GT, '20 GT350
Vehicle Showcase
1
Holy crap a lot of these photos have way too much post-processing crap done to them.
 

OppoLock

RWD Addict
Joined
Apr 21, 2014
Threads
43
Messages
3,098
Reaction score
870
Location
St. Petersburg, FL
First Name
Sean
Vehicle(s)
'15 GT, '20 GT350
Vehicle Showcase
1
1) keep the frame level with the horizon.

2) avoid over/under-exposure, otherwise you'll drown out the detailing via lighting or shadows.

3) excessive saturation just makes your car look like a circus clown.

4) avoid HDR like the plague.

5) do NOT use filter effects. Keep that stuff to the kids in elementary school.

6) excessive DoF/blurring does not make your photo look professional. Like everything else, it can be done in moderation, typically with macro shots of specific up close features. If you're taking a full landscape shot, just avoid it.

For great examples, here's a good photographer: http://www.1013mm.com/
 

Sponsored

JimmyTwoTimes

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Threads
50
Messages
3,298
Reaction score
385
Location
New York
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT Premium
Personally, I prefer to use my Polaroid instant camera so I don't have to wait for lab processing.
 

likeaboss

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2013
Threads
42
Messages
2,412
Reaction score
983
Location
Baltimore, MD
Vehicle(s)
2020 Corvette Z51
Since many of us use cell phone cameras. What's the best way to get a good picture given the restrictions of the phone's lenses? Which usually means no optical zoom.
Sponsored

 
 




Top