- Banned
- #76
I fully agree that manual transmission is not hard at all, any idiot can do it, it's nothing special in any way, shape, or form. What is special is that for some reason unknown to me, no one else is actually doing it.
Sponsored
I think the reasons are many. Some of it is that automatic transmissions have improved significantly in performance over the years. Some of it is that there is a younger generation that simply has not had much exposure to manuals and thus stick with what they know. Some of it is because frankly the population is growing and traffic is becoming an issue in more and more cities.I fully agree that manual transmission is not hard at all, any idiot can do it, it's nothing special in any way, shape, or form. What is special is that for some reason unknown to me, no one else is actually doing it.
That is my motivation. Among a group of car guys, i'm seen as an automotive extremist; thats a little sad, but I recognize myself as the canary in the automotive coal mine.Regardless of the reasons, the bottom line is that manuals are becoming less common. I fear that some day they will be a niche item that will be exclusively available as part of a special 'track pack' or the like, rather than a standard feature. That would be a crying shame...
Try to buy a Z28 with an auto. Not happening. Viper? Nope. Corvette C7R race car? Nada.A Mustang GT PP option not offered with an automatic or in a convertible? (forget the limited 50th - that's just a limited showroom mark-up tool). Even Ferraris come in automatics now. The Corvette Z06 has an automatic. Even race cars are automatics these days! :shrug:
While I agree it is nice to see, there is probably other forces at work here. Part of it is probably due to the power/torque ratings of the engines you are referring to are more than the autos those companies have can support. MTs are cheaper to develop and make stronger.Try to buy a Z28 with an auto. Not happening. Viper? Nope. Corvette C7R race car? Nada.
It's nice to see a few manual trans goodies thrown to the hard core drivers for a change.
Michael
What? Math involves numbers and variables. Options and Packages isn't math.Most women buy automatics.
They assume men will be satisfied with sticks.
Since mostly only the male buyers care about the PP option, they only offer it in stick - no automatic.
Trust me, that is their math.
Chevy woke up and offered the 600+ HP Z06 with an automatic. Time for Ford to wake up too. Hey Ford: focus on that instead of cars on top of the empire state building. :rant:
That is my motivation. Among a group of car guys, i'm seen as an automotive extremist; thats a little sad, but I recognize myself as the canary in the automotive coal mine.
Funny. Isn't that just a pessimistic way of saying it requires some skill? ;)I honestly think they are archaic with a higher variable for human error than an automatic.
My little sister drives manual, and she's 21...I glottal say it out loud: The Mustang GT options seem diluted to capture women buyers.
A Mustang GT PP option not offered with an automatic or in a convertible? (forget the limited 50th - that's just a limited showroom mark-up tool). Even Ferraris come in automatics now. The Corvette Z06 has an automatic. Even race cars are automatics these days! :shrug:
But noooo… Ford figures automatics are only for non-performance oriented females.
We know Ford wishes the number of women buyers would increase for the Mustang like they once were, but c'mon. The market has changed - women have other options nowadays (e.g. Kia Soul and other cute zoomy cars).
I've waited for the specs on the 2015 - and big time disappointed now. :frusty:
Funny. Isn't that just a pessimistic way of saying it requires some skill? ;)
Personally, I don't want all of the skill removed from driving, thank you. We're already headed that direction, and have been for a long time, unfortunately.
I'm not 100% confident what ceo said (but i think it was lamborghini's) "The problem is, the skill level of the driver doesn't increase with the cost of the car"While I agree it is nice to see, there is probably other forces at work here. Part of it is probably due to the power/torque ratings of the engines you are referring to are more than the autos those companies have can support. MTs are cheaper to develop and make stronger.
On the flip side, you could just as easily talk about the opposite.
Want an MT in a 911 Turbo or GT3? Try again.
McLearan 12C or P1? Nope.
Ferrari 458? Not there.
Mercedes SLS? Never gonna' happen.
Anything Lamborghini? Not anymore.
And all of those are faster and more desirable.
It is interesting to note that when money is no object, the MT is typically the first to go.