Sponsored

GT350R max alignment settings

cweller

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Threads
5
Messages
47
Reaction score
13
Location
California
Vehicle(s)
Mustang
Does anyone know how much negative camber you can get out of the R model without camber plates? I've posted this before, and either no one here races these cars, or no one has ever tried to align an R.
Sponsored

 

xt6wagon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2015
Threads
4
Messages
572
Reaction score
192
Location
WA
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350 base triple yellow
It is my understanding there is no stock camber adjustment in the front. You can loosen stuff up and maybe get a little or balance out L Vs R.
 

motoviper

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2014
Threads
0
Messages
17
Reaction score
6
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350R RR/black roof/elec GR174
You have zero adjustment with the stock setup. It is about -1.0 to -1.1 factory. You can get different lower strut bolt that are not splined and hog out/elongate the aluminum strut Hub holes to get up to about -1.75 deg but then it also puts the tire closure to the damper body. So I went to camber plates to easily get up to -2.2 deg.
 
OP
OP

cweller

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Threads
5
Messages
47
Reaction score
13
Location
California
Vehicle(s)
Mustang
You have zero adjustment with the stock setup. It is about -1.0 to -1.1 factory. You can get different lower strut bolt that are not splined and hog out/elongate the aluminum strut Hub holes to get up to about -1.75 deg but then it also puts the tire closure to the damper body. So I went to camber plates to easily get up to -2.2 deg.
Is this true with the R as it is with the standard GT350? The R is supposed to have a more aggressive alignment from the factory, so I'm curious what Ford is doing differently if there's no adjustment.
 

mattlqx

Driver
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Threads
15
Messages
2,478
Reaction score
1,635
Location
Mesa, AZ
First Name
Matt
Vehicle(s)
'22 Mach 1, '16 F-150, '14 Fiesta ST, '14 Audi A7
Is this true with the R as it is with the standard GT350? The R is supposed to have a more aggressive alignment from the factory, so I'm curious what Ford is doing differently if there's no adjustment.
Could just be a byproduct of slightly shorter springs?
 

Sponsored

FTD

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 25, 2015
Threads
4
Messages
464
Reaction score
148
Location
VA
Vehicle(s)
16 GT350R
The R has slightly more camber in the front due to the ride height difference.
 

motoviper

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2014
Threads
0
Messages
17
Reaction score
6
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350R RR/black roof/elec GR174
Is this true with the R as it is with the standard GT350? The R is supposed to have a more aggressive alignment from the factory, so I'm curious what Ford is doing differently if there's no adjustment.
Yes. Mine is with an R. I am not aware of any way there could be differences between an R and non-R regarding camber as all parts affecting this spec are identical. The spring heights could affect the resting camber but from my measurements from mine to others non-R, the resting heights are not that different when you take into account the difference in tire diameter. Yes, the spring is shorter, but the spring rate is about 50 lbs/in different so the resting spring length is pretty close.
Sponsored

 
 








Top