Sponsored

GT350 vs. Z/28

Status
Not open for further replies.
OP
OP
thePill

thePill

Camaro5's Most Wanted
Joined
Aug 13, 2012
Threads
37
Messages
6,561
Reaction score
699
Location
Pittsburgh
Vehicle(s)
S550
While we wait for Ford to conduct Extreme Hot Weather testing, lets look at some of the things that are working on the 2014 "Z/28". (EDIT: GM Authority originally published the article, sorry for the mix up) GM Authority posted a really cool article about the Z and 28 things that were improved on. The original article is here: http://gmauthority.com/blog/2014/02...aro-z28-broken-down-into-28-different-points/

First thing I seen was the Duck tail spoiler. On my 2013 Z/28 thread on Camaro5 (pretty old), I suggested they use something similar. I posted pictures of the Intimidator Camaro. Here is what they used.



Here is what I suggested...






I think the Z's version is far better, both in quality and function. I think it looks much better as well. I'm not sure if any additional downforce would be achieved by using the Intimidator's Duck tail. If it is a GM part, and if it does benefit the car, I would like seeing a full blown version offered as an option.

Next, the unique front fascia and and chin splitter. I'm still not crazy about the 2014 in general, I think it was a bad refresh. However, I have reason to believe the whole Camaro lineup was based on the Z. It was clearly the source for the direction because it is obviously, hands down, the best looking. Close to being the best looking 5th Gen as far as fascia's go. The functionality is still questionable, as is air flow vs. the '10-'13.



You can see my color concept below, I hand sculpted the front fascia to try and accomplish what Team Camaro did in the '14 Z. I also added the famous Leno hood and my own 70's style graphic art duck tail. I honestly feel that if my version was attempted, it would have been "THE" Camaro to have.



I think the Black and Red Z's are the best colors offered. One hides some of the things I didn't like and the Red highlights the area's that I think worked well. I would have liked to seen just a tiny bit more difference between SS and Z though...

They also talk about the most of the lightweight components. The wheels, tires, No A/C, Lighter back seat, thinner glass (kinda extreme, but neat) and the Carbon Ceramic Rotors. I hope these things are at least options on the GT350. I wouldn't want the use of Carbon Ceramic Brakes to disqualify the GT350 from class competition both professional and amateur. Lets keep this in mind and stress this openly NOW. The Street Fighter should be competitive where it needs to be but let the customers chose. Same for the extra coolers and such...



The LS7 is definitely an awesome engine to have on the street. There are some valve issues but I believe those are issues caused from modding. The cylinder walls are thin so forced induction is not a good idea. You have a hard time explaining that to some Camaro fans but it's true. this is a road racing engine... It gets heavy flak from Motorsport organizations World wide for is displacement and output. It also gets heavy flak from me for this very reason... Although, I consider it as THE number 1 production pushrod V8 of all time. You really can't get any better in technology, use of alternative metals, engineering, weight (about 450lbs) and cost. It's displacement can be seen as a blessing or a curse... To me, it becomes obsolete once it becomes unusable.



The strut tower brace is mentioned but, in my professional opinion, the strut tower brace needs to be 1.) Welded to the strut towers OR 2.) Connect to the Firewall. Both would be even better. Even under light loads, the brace still flexes and has no real function. Welding them in place is not an option... I did see a picture of the new GT's engine bay and it has the strut towers braced to the Firewall AND together. I'll dig up the picture in a few.



I would obviously expect the GT350 to have one of these if the GT.R is sporting one.

Tremec six-speed manual... double- and triple-cone synchronizers... Cool BUT!!!! It still has two overdrives. The GT350 is using a Street Fighter version of the Getrag. Trust me fella's, the 109lbs Getrag is the way to go. One overdrive, lightweight, quart cap upgradable, STEEP 1st gear ratio AND, anything Coyote based will escape the gas guzzler tax.
DSSV damper technology -- The Z/28 uses Dynamic Suspensions Spool Valve dampers from Multimatic that rely on spool valves to control the fluid rather than deflected discs. They provide almost double the damper stiffness of the 1LE.
These are really cool... I feel if Multimatic is engineering the GT/GT350 for IMSA, we might see these very shocks on the GT350. Multimatic moved back to the Ford Mustang and Ford Racing prior to the start of the Roar Before the 24 back in January, It was November/December when they made the announcement and won the Pole in the BMW Performance 200. The race looked rigged and I believe Turner's M3's were disqualified after the race for a MAJOR infraction. They finished 7th I think... Not sure... BMW cheating messed everything up.



Overall, I think the Camaro, the Z especially, still has a strong, muscular profile. I'll admit, it does come off as early 70's Musclecar dressed up in Trans Am clothing. The profile above does rekindle some of the flare used in the '70's Z28's, I think that's a good thing. I even tried to tie in the '78-'80 Z28 DNA in my fascia and rocker work, as well as the duck tail.

The article was pretty cool and, if you have time to skim through it, you will see there is a lot more I didn't mention. It isn't anything major but there is some stuff there. One issue I have with the Z's aero package treatment is the cheap fender flares. They look very low budget on the OEM car and, they make the Pro Z/28 look very strange. The required tire width in IMSA GS does not require a flare at all. The front fenders stick out like Dumbo ears...



The more I look at those tiny 18x10 Continentals R's in those Autozone fender flares, the more I hate the whole car again. These are late '70's innovation at best... I would have scrapped the whole car if I could not get past that lazy aspect of the design. This needs to be a one piece fender at the very minimum.




Edit: I actually looked for any possible alternatives to the '14's front fender flares. I didn't like anything aftermarket, there was nothing that looked even remotely pleasing. It makes me further question why they didn't just use a 295/35R19 all around. Avoid the use of the taped on fender flares and the race version looking silly.

Back to the fascia, I would like to see an attempt at a chin splitter like this, something a little more raw and race ready. I think the splitter it comes equipped with works, I just want to see a hardcore exterior and a little less Fast N Furious.





I have been looking at the Transformers 4 Bumblebee, I have also been following Doc's 2016 Camaro design thread. I see a huge conflict inbound for the Camaro. Doc brings up some pretty good points and it is indeed a hurdle for Team Camaro. I think the 2015MY should be cut short and this should finish out 2015 and 2016. I completely believe that this is a glimpses of the 2017, 6th Gen Camaro. The '14 has already started in that direction.



I seen a DIB Mustang in Pittsburgh, it is just plain awesome... if feels new but familiar. The '14MY Pony Cars feel old in both style and size. The 2015 Mustang is literally a perfect size for it's class. The wheelbase is optimal, track as well. Height is ideal, length... The doors are perfectly proportioned, the hood is great, the fascia is arguably the best part of the car, the rear is the same. It's new, it feels like a positive direction. Upbeat and ready for another great generation. Ready to progress, move forward with force... Continue. I felt relief overall at first, then curiosity. The pictures lose sight of the Mustang... There is a lot to look at but not forced on you.

In other words... The Camaro needs a refresh...

[ame]



I skimmed through the initial report in Hot Rod a few weeks ago and got a peek at some of the GT's equipment. You will be pleased to know that the GT.R (GT Track Pack) is pushing the limits of each class it is eligible for. It uses the maximum 380mm front disc, and I believe maximum in the rear. The tires are not maxed out but, they are the largest allowed without a waiver. It is obvious Ford has done some Motorsport homework. In truth, most of the GT.R's initial measurements are right there with the '14 Z. We may see Ford use the GT against the Z in racing while the GT350 goes on ahead to underdog the Stingray Z51. Back where it started 50 years ago... Back gunning for the Corvette as a World Class Sports Coupe.
Sponsored

 
OP
OP
thePill

thePill

Camaro5's Most Wanted
Joined
Aug 13, 2012
Threads
37
Messages
6,561
Reaction score
699
Location
Pittsburgh
Vehicle(s)
S550
Car and Driver published renderings of the GT350 in the latest issue. The hood scoop should be functional. Mostly derived from the 2011 Shelby GT350 and the original. Looks mean none the less...

attachment.jpg






Hopefully, the CAI is mounted and functional like the GT3 MARC VDS Mustang.



The 2015 Mustang in general has adopted the popular (and preferred) front fascia setup. A larger upper and lower grill w/dividers and larger open fog light/brake duct ports. The engine now sits further back and lower in the engine bay. This will allow a system like this to work when needed... A real, functioning hood scoop... Cold Ram Air Induction... Also notice how the strut tower brace is attached to the firewall. This is one of the only ways a strut tower brace will help. Tower to tower is a bit of a waste... Turning forces are never applied to the suspension/chassis from left to right. Chassis flex occurs at the angle of turn in and is shifted to the opposing rear tire, the shift is actually the entire side, both front and rear. The GT.R and GT350 are equipped this way. There could still be an additional bar from tower to tower that also attach at the firewall. This would be optimal.

What the Mustang has evolved into: larger upper and lower grills and larger fog light ports.



I still feel the GT350's hood stack will be more raised than the GT's. I wouldn't mind a heat extractor set up either. Remember, there are other ports for a good clean CAI to work.
(cont.)
 

Stuntman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2013
Threads
5
Messages
1,448
Reaction score
488
Location
SoCal
Vehicle(s)
many
...Duck tail spoiler.
Fixed it for you :)

Those supports are really turbulate the airflow and are not as good aerodynamically as having a splitter of proper strength and design that does not need supports.

As far as the tack-on fenders that allow for a wider stance for better handling, they remind me of the Porsche 997 GT3 4.0:



I like function > form so it does not really bother me that much. The Z28 is a pretty aerodynamic car with a lot of thought that went into it.
 

Sponsored

OP
OP
thePill

thePill

Camaro5's Most Wanted
Joined
Aug 13, 2012
Threads
37
Messages
6,561
Reaction score
699
Location
Pittsburgh
Vehicle(s)
S550
Fixed it for you :)


Those supports are really turbulate the airflow and are not as good aerodynamically as having a splitter of proper strength and design that does not need supports.

As far as the tack-on fenders that allow for a wider stance for better handling, they remind me of the Porsche 997 GT3 4.0:



I like function > form so it does not really bother me that much. The Z28 is a pretty aerodynamic car with a lot of thought that went into it.
Wow! I really ducked that up LOL... At least I was consistent. Fixed and Thank You...

I copy what your saying about the turbulent hangers, most times we are willing to take a small bump in aero to keep air out from under the car. I got a decent look at the z28 but didn't really examine the fascia. Although, from what I gather from pictures, what they settled on has far greater form than the Intimidator's splitter. Who knows, the Intimidator's splitter could be a total form piece and not do anything productive... the "race" look...

I am not feeling the tack on fender extensions, they look corny. The GT3 uses a fascia flare, those fascia flares can be quick swapped out for fascia ballards. That is quite the busy Porsche fascia I must say. The z28's fender extensions look cheap... not even in the $30,000 price range would I allow that. It is possible the finish product uses unique 1 piece fender flared panels. That would be a very pleasant surprise. This is all because they wanted or needed to run 305's boxed. In the meantime, that 305 up front gets the Z cut from most SCCA/FIA classes. Considering the other equipment on the z28 that contributed to its illegality, I'd say it was beyond "Who cares". They could have dropped to a 295 boxed, saved more weight, saved the customer money both initially and in consumables AND... would have made a stride to being competition ready.

I'm still highly disappointed at the Z/28.R in GS. There was absolutely NO Motorsport effort and it was last minute at that. I think it was real sh!tty and no where close to the heritage of the 1967 Z/28. The MSRP is unreasonable, the ZL1 is a better car... it just lacks the tire.

I see people trying to justify the price using inflation. I see comparisons to the '67-'69 Z/28 and to the 2000 Cobra R. The original Z/28 was legal to race EVERYWHERE... even the drag strip. The '00 Cobra R was sanctioned in a large majority of classes Nation wide. Classes that the 2000 Cobra R STILL race to this very day. That is what the GT350 should be, taking over the old Z06's turf and developing that reputation... all for hopefully under $50,000. I would like to see a GT350.R, I think if the Street Fighter opens up slightly below $50k, there will be room for an R model between that and a GT500 come 2017-'18.

On another issue, the 5th Gens sales are not moving well. The refresh was horribly bad and the results are near disastrous. I would dare to say the numbers this month are rental and fleet on all Pony cars. I don't have proof of that though. I don't know how many more Mustangs are left... Did Ford start production again on the '14's due to the Fall S550 release? I only figured a 90 day stock... They might need to make a couple Mustangs this Summer. They beat the Camaro this month and had a decent bump. Good job Ford.

lls for another Nurburgring run... Why??? Let it go fella's... They ran in dry conditions for two weeks, they couldn't get a better time boys. Take that money and make those fender extensions into a fine 1 piece fender. The Pre-Production 2011 Shelby GT350 used a tacked on lower air dam on the fascia. It was two piece and it looked awful. However, when we tested one, the final product had a proper fascia that screamed GT350.

Maybe... jaaaaaaaa-ust maybe... we could see a nice surprise from Chevrolet.



...theEnd
 

Stuntman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2013
Threads
5
Messages
1,448
Reaction score
488
Location
SoCal
Vehicle(s)
many
Wow! I really ducked that up LOL... At least I was consistent. Fixed and Thank You...

I copy what your saying about the turbulent hangers, most times we are willing to take a small bump in aero to keep air out from under the car. I got a decent look at the z28 but didn't really examine the fascia. Although, from what I gather from pictures, what they settled on has far greater form than the Intimidator's splitter. Who knows, the Intimidator's splitter could be a total form piece and not do anything productive... the "race" look...

(Cont...)
Other than the obvious reference to DE, can you educate me on the Intimidator.

The Zs splitter is a lot longer than the intimidator and the overall aero package looks to be very thought out from splitter to adj spoiler to the little air deflectors in front of the front tires, its pretty serious.
 
OP
OP
thePill

thePill

Camaro5's Most Wanted
Joined
Aug 13, 2012
Threads
37
Messages
6,561
Reaction score
699
Location
Pittsburgh
Vehicle(s)
S550
Other than the obvious reference to DE, can you educate me on the Intimidator.

The Zs splitter is a lot longer than the intimidator and the overall aero package looks to be very thought out from splitter to adj spoiler to the little air deflectors in front of the front tires, its pretty serious.
I'm not sure but, I think it was just an appearance package LS3 SS. I know the equipment used is pretty serious stuff for pretty high speeds. I believe it was more a representation of NASCAR style equipment... which I think totally works on the Camaro.
 
OP
OP
thePill

thePill

Camaro5's Most Wanted
Joined
Aug 13, 2012
Threads
37
Messages
6,561
Reaction score
699
Location
Pittsburgh
Vehicle(s)
S550
The GT3 is a serious, serious car. I don't care what they managed to Ring out of a garbage chassis. If indeed the Mustang GTR was keeping pace with a Boss 302S, that would put a base GT350 in the 1:36-1:39 at Laguna Seca, that's C6 Z06/Z07 territory AND, that's a MGTR. Ford was using Motorsport Rulebooks when the GT's "R" package was made. The package will be marketed as such... Evidence of this exist in the 380mm rotor upgrade,, the largest maximum size allowed in front. The rears are maxed out as well. The boxed wheel/tire setup allows for tire rotation between events and, 275 is the largest size tire up front without being forced to apply for a 295 waiver.

This is a GT we are talking about, equipped with a Track Package, hopefully now called the Race Package or Race model. MGTR looks neat... Make it happen. The GT350 will most likely be used in the higher end series like IMSA GT, SCCA GTS and FIA GT3. Only this time, the Mustang in these classes will not be a tube framed, nothing in common with OEM, nameplate advertisement. S197's had to be modified a great deal... The Z/28.R currently in GS will soon find itself facing off against a MGTR, NOT the GT350.



Perhaps I need to change the pic in the OP. I hope I don't need to change the model year, would love to see a 50th Anniversary GT350. January 2015 would see a Daytona debut and would still be considered a 2015. I wouldn't mind that at all... Would like to see some GTs doing R&D in GS this year. Come on Multimatic!!!

I want the GT350 to assume the Z06/Z07's abandoned role... The fastest, most drop dead gorgeous, bang for the American buck that ever was. The Argument Ender, the New Standard...

The Camaro's "Z/28" nameplate isn't screwed forever though, the heritage is forever off track. This is a new "Z/28", it's difficult to work an MSRP back from a $75,000 endeavor. It has been marketed to death and is still being marketed as needed. The slash or no slash thing is clever, I am anticipating a possible Z28 to down sale to "Z/28" hopefuls.

I saw most people were ordering the AC and Speakers, that makes a Z just as heavy as an SS. Sooooooo much money spent for no effect at all...
 

Sponsored

Grimace427

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2013
Threads
14
Messages
6,467
Reaction score
1,702
Location
NoVA
Vehicle(s)
2011 Mustang 5.0
I want to see Ford work with Michelin to get some specific track-worthy but streetable tires to try and eliminate a lot of the handicaps we've been facing with Pirelli. The Super Sport has proven to be an enormous star in the performance street tire world and should be standard on the Mustang, in more generous sizes and at a price that beats anything from Pirelli. Taking things further, Ford can spec a Pilot Cup 2 or even a Mustang specific Cup 3 tire to really knock out Chevy's teeth on the track all while allowing owners to be able to drive to the track without having to swap wheels.

18" wheels have been a mainstay for those who track/auto-x due to price and availability but when you look at how wide versus how tall the available tires are, one will see that 19" tires are actually filling the slot a bit better now. For an OEM setup and especially with huge 15" brakes going to a 19" wheel/tire setup is the grudgingly logical choice. This is where Michelin can really help us out, offering ideal Mustang-sized and spec'ed tires and with the volume of Mustang sales hopefully getting a price we can live with.
 

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
8,852
Reaction score
4,652
Location
On a corner barstool not too far from I-95
First Name
Norm
Vehicle(s)
'08 GT #85, '19 WRX
18" wheels have been a mainstay for those who track/auto-x due to price and availability but when you look at how wide versus how tall the available tires are, one will see that 19" tires are actually filling the slot a bit better now. For an OEM setup and especially with huge 15" brakes going to a 19" wheel/tire setup is the grudgingly logical choice.
The sad thing is that 'styling' with respect to tire OD seems to have been the driving force, with rotor sizes only recently starting to take advantage of the extra room. Otherwise only a minor change in final drive gearing sufficient to avoid needing 3rd is all an autocrosser would need (or staying out of 5th at track days for us with 4.6L/TR3650 cars).


Norm
 
OP
OP
thePill

thePill

Camaro5's Most Wanted
Joined
Aug 13, 2012
Threads
37
Messages
6,561
Reaction score
699
Location
Pittsburgh
Vehicle(s)
S550
What's a Mustang GTR?
Ah, sorry about that... I'll explain the Mustang GTR. The GTR badge has been used the world over. It's an evolution of the GT, BMW has an M3 GTR... "R" always means "Race" or "Racing" in Ford terms (BMW Too). Most people instantly think Nissan when they hear GTR, as they should. However, Ford developed a Concept in 2004 called the Mustang GTR. It was made solely to show intentions of a well funded, Motorsport program for the new S197. Mustang GTR was trademarked and is still trademarked today.

The new GT's equipment has exceeded my expectations. I looks as if the GT with "Track Package" will far exceed the Boss 302 Laguna Seca's standard equipment. The track pack GT is pretty serious this time. There is something that bothers me with the "Track Pack" label... It's corny, dull and very retro. My hopes here is to entice Team Mustang to bring back the "R Models" in place of the Track Package. Since Ford still has rights to the GTR name, I think they should use it. The 5.0 GT and GTR would exceed performance of the Boss 302 and Boss 302 LS. Once the GT shows up in Pro, they will adopt the R anyway... Which is why there is also an M3 GTR...

Now, back to the GT350... In light of the Mustang GTR, there could always be a GT350R. Originally, there was a '65-'66 GT350R. I have also seen a '66 Mustang GTR (actually badged) but I'm not sure if it was real. I was told they were nothing special, basically a stripped GT (I may have pictures of it). I would love to see that!!! I believe if Ford (and Roush) intend on competing at the GT level with the Corvette, Viper, R8, 911, fake Camaro and so on, they may move to replace the current tube framed S197 (called GT.R) with a more OEM related GT350.

This all of course will lead to a 2017 GT500 and a 2018 GT500KR.

See the streamlined product lineup?

Sponsored

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
 








Top