sk47
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2020
- Threads
- 32
- Messages
- 6,808
- Reaction score
- 3,157
- Location
- North Eastern TN
- First Name
- Jeff
- Vehicle(s)
- Chevy Silverado & Nissan Sentra SE
Hello BlackandBlue; So back a few posts you asked the Gregs24 to explain.Whilst this may well be true, the issue is that the population currently in California wasn't there in the past and the current infrastructure will struggle, or is struggling, to support them. The solution to that problem is not really for this thread on gas prices however!
Quote BlackandBlue " Please do help me to understand. Please explain it to me."
So far he has declined to do so leaving his decree stand that you lack understanding.
Hello; Now he feels entitled to decide what is relevant to the thread. Thing is many of the policy decisions from on high about fossil fuels which have led to these high prices use the heat and fires in the south west and indeed California as a basis. Long before "global warming' became the clarion cry it was known that the local climate of the area was prone to be dry.
In fact I was unable to sleep last night so wound up watching a PBS program about significant events in USA history. Things such as the interstate system and the Hoover dam. Among these ten or so things was what was done around the turn of the century (1900's). That being the moving of river waters hundreds of miles so cities such as LA did not dry out. Currently much of the Colorado river is being diverted by canals and high power pumps to lift it over mountain ranges.
So yes the history of California in terms of being an historical drought prone area is relevant. Relevant because the fires are touted on the various talking head and news programs as being a part of global warming.
Not sure Gregs24 will see this as he may have me on ignore, but figure BlackandBlue will.
Sponsored