Epiphany
Well-Known Member
I didn't post everything relayed to me as I didn't think it was fair to share some of the detail. The engineer I spoke with didn't go back and review his notes (AFAIK) or dig up internal communications but just gave me a quick response to point me in a certain direction. Having been the one that worked with Ford engineers on the GT350 and GT500 systems, lets just say he's very well versed when he needs to be specific. As I said, the GT350 and GT500 dampers have similar changes with respect to the slot gaps that allow fluid flow. Such that the GT350R and CFTP GT500 will provide a relative increase in "stiffness" with no magnetic field applied over the GT350 or Base versions. The rationale behind the calibration that Ford ultimately chose....only they know that.The engineer you quoted didn't *really* know what the differences were. He was guessing and trying to remember things from years ago. We're not going to do much better.
It would be silly for Ford to spec tiny differences in damper internals when the damper controller itself can account for massive ones. They don't keep a bunch of extra SKU's sitting around for fun. Chances are that they *tested* several versions, chose one and then adjusted the actual damping forces with the controller.
I _know_ the Mustang (all of them) use a certain Magneride (call Version A) spec. I'm fairly certain that the base 350 uses the same. The 350R _definitely_ uses a second spec (Version B) which is roughly twice the damping. I would suspect the 500 & 500 CFTP use the same version as the 350R. Having said that, it's entirely possible they use a third, Version C spec.
I have not found anyone at Ford Performance, Ford parts or a dealer that knows a damn thing about the Magneride. It's like an information black hole. Quizzing that engineer is you best bet.
There are a few in vehicle dynamics at Ford that could be very specific about this, except they never will publicly. And they have all moved on to other projects so as time passes the window of opportunity to obtain specifics evaporates.
And to your comment that "It would be silly for Ford to spec tiny differences in damper internals when the damper controller itself can account for massive ones. They don't keep a bunch of extra SKU's sitting around for fun. Chances are that they *tested* several versions, chose one and then adjusted the actual damping forces with the controller." Call it what you want but that is the reality. Those minor slot gap differences result in different part numbers. The results Ford/BWI achieved were a combination of software and hardware.
Sponsored