Dyno Thread

[DivineStrike]

So I think I win lowest stock numbers to the wheel. Mustang dyno. 299whp/309wtq. I'll post up the graph when I can. It is I'd because my gti was 233hp and 280tq on the same dyno

Sponsored

 

[DivineStrike]

Bump because I'd like to see more dyno's and an update for my car.

Ok redyno'd at 4250miles. Looks like the results were as expected and were more typical of what we've been seeing.

Ambient air was between 65-70. So warmer than the other dyno by a good bit as well.

run 1 4th gear: 377hp/351tq
run 2 4th gear: 379hp/352tq
run 3 5th gear: 387hp/374tq

 

[Tubalkayne]

Here are my numbers, I'm very impressed concidering it came off a Mustang Dyno and I am under the same information that the Mustang Dyno is more accurate than the others. I was running 93 Octane and I believe the pull was in 5th gear.

Type of engine: 5.0 Coyote
Type of Dyno: Mustang
Wheel Horsepower: 382
Torque: 375
Any mods: bone stock

I'm planning on a Steeda CAI and tune, it was mentioned that I am running pretty rich due to the fuel being pumped into the cats to keep them cool (this make no sense) thinking of removing them to enhance flow and fuel economy.

 

[HalfMoon]

Here are my numbers, I'm very impressed concidering it came off a Mustang Dyno and I am under the same information that the Mustang Dyno is more accurate than the others. I was running 93 Octane and I believe the pull was in 5th gear.

Type of engine: 5.0 Coyote
Type of Dyno: Mustang
Wheel Horsepower: 382
Torque: 375
Any mods: bone stock

I'm planning on a Steeda CAI and tune, it was mentioned that I am running pretty rich due to the fuel being pumped into the cats to keep them cool (this make no sense) thinking of removing them to enhance flow and fuel economy.

I think you found the world's most generous Mustang dyno. If we go by the assumed standard and say that Mustangs dynos read 10% lower than Dynojets, you have a 420 Dynojet HP stock car.

Did these guys give you a printout?

 

[09jsw]

The settings may have been set to read as a dyno jet does. Normally 10% low for regular mustang dyno.

 

[Tommy V]

Mine was 385 hp and 359. Tq sae correction stock and with catback it was 387 hp and 362 tq sae correction .My dyno is in the magnaflow thread.I have not figured out how to post pics and videos with using my galaxy 3 yet lol so I have some friends that post for me.

 

[Demon Coyote]

I have installed the following:

-LT Headers
-Bassani Catback
-JLT CAI
-BAMA 93 Octane Track Tune
-Eibach Sportline Lowering Springs

Best run 409whp 396wtq uncorrected

Barometric pressure 31 inHG.
Humidity: 75%
60-65 degrees F.
Uncorrected data (Raw data did not use SAE or STD correction)
Mustang dyno
All 5th Gear pulls

 

[Tubalkayne]

The settings may have been set to read as a dyno jet does. Normally 10% low for regular mustang dyno.

Setting were not adjusted to my knowledge, I'd be curious to see what it runs on a DynoJet. Sam did state that the mustang dyno will read Less than a Dynojet. I know Zombie pulled 412 and 390 on a dynojet.

 

[09jsw]

Setting were not adjusted to my knowledge, I'd be curious to see what it runs on a DynoJet. Sam did state that the mustang dyno will read Less than a Dynojet. I know Zombie pulled 412 and 390 on a dynojet.

I'm curious to because From personal experance they read 10-12% low.
If a stock car was making that much then it's making well about factory spec and closer to 500 crank hp.

 

[Mikeiscoo2]

I have installed the following:

-LT Headers
-Bassani Catback
-JLT CAI
-BAMA 93 Octane Track Tune
-Eibach Sportline Lowering Springs

Best run 409whp 396wtq uncorrected

Barometric pressure 31 inHG.
Humidity: 75%
60-65 degrees F.
Uncorrected data (Raw data did not use SAE or STD correction)
Mustang dyno
All 5th Gear pulls

seems crazy with LT's you ran 409whp and 396wtq but then again who knows its a mustang dyno..

 

[DivineStrike]

Yea who knows the mustang dyno I was on read 299whp while the dynojet read 387

 

[Tubalkayne]

I'm sure there is a required calibration for them and may not always be done .

 

[cush]

can anyone clarify if there is that big of a difference (18%) like the shop told me? I think I am going to go to another shop. At then end, I was not totally satisfied.

If the Dynojet numbers in this thread are accurate, then those cars were losing between 9% to just over 11% of their HP through the drive train, again assuming the 435 HP rating from Ford is accurate for the flywheel number... you are losing about 17.5% of your HP. This doesn't seem right, and I don't know if 93 vs. 87 octane can explain that size of a drop.... I'd do a Dynojet to get apples to apples.

 

[y2ksilverbullit]

Has anyone dynoed there 50 Le yet?

http://www.mustang6g.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13956

:cheers:

 

[arieso94z28]

Type of engine: 5.0L V8

Type of Dyno: Dynojet @6200' above sea level

RWHP: 412

RWTQ: 390

Mods: SW Long Tubes, Gibson Catback, Air raid CAI, BAMA Mail Tune

Sponsored